World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
14065
World Ranking
5817
National Ranking
3153

Sam Glucksberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Glucksberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sam Glucksberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Glucksberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1985 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1978 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sam Glucksberg is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and has made contributions across multiple fields of study including Computer Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Their research incorporates several subfields, predominantly Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work covers a range of topics, with a focus on Speech and Dialogue Systems, Memory Processes and Influences, Child and Animal Learning Development, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled "What Influences Successful Communication? An Examination of Cognitive Load and Individual Differences", published in 2020 in the journal Discourse Processes. This paper explores the impact of cognitive load and individual differences on communication effectiveness.

Sam Glucksberg frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Ester Navarro, Brooke N. Macnamara, Andrew R. A. Conway, and Zachary Estes. These coauthor relationships highlight interdisciplinary partnerships, likely enriching the scope and depth of their research.

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Discourse Processes

The scientist's work is recognized through awards such as:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 1985
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), awarded in 1978

Best Publications

  • Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms

    Sam Glucksberg

  • Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity.

    Sam Glucksberg;Boaz Keysar

  • Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets?

    Michael E. McCloskey;Sam Glucksberg

  • How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.

    Roger J. Kreuz;Sam Glucksberg

  • The psycholinguistics of metaphor

    Sam Glucksberg

  • On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?

    Sam Glucksberg;Patricia Gildea;Howard B. Bookin

  • Property attribution in metaphor comprehension

    Sam Glucksberg;Matthew S. McGlone;Deanna Manfredi

  • How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.

    Sachi Kumon-Nakamura;Sam Glucksberg;Mary Brown

  • Understanding idiomatic expressions. The contribution of word meanings

    Cristina Cacciari;Sam Glucksberg

  • Referential communication in nursery school children: method and some preliminary findings.

    Sam Glucksberg;Robert M. Krauss;Robert Weisberg

  • Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory.

    Michael McCloskey;Sam Glucksberg

  • The Development of Communication: Competence as a Function of Age.

    Robert M. Krauss;Sam Glucksberg

  • When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean

    Sam Glucksberg;Matthew S. McGlone

  • Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?

    Boaz Keysar;Yeshayahu Shen;Sam Glucksberg;William S Horton

  • Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors work

    Sam Glucksberg;Boaz Keysar

  • On understanding metaphor: the role of context

    Patricia Gildea;Sam Glucksberg

  • Context can constrain lexical access: implications for models of language comprehension

    Sam Glucksberg;Roger J. Kreuz;Susan H. Rho

  • Does understanding negation entail affirmation?: An examination of negated metaphors

    Uri Hasson;Sam Glucksberg

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors create categories – quickly

    Sam Glucksberg

  • Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension.

    Matthew S McGlone;Sam Glucksberg;Cristina Cacciari

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah-Jane Leslie
Sarah-Jane Leslie Princeton University
Boaz Keysar
Boaz Keysar University of Chicago
Robert M. Krauss
Robert M. Krauss Columbia University
Michael McCloskey
Michael McCloskey Johns Hopkins University
Robert W. Weisberg
Robert W. Weisberg Temple University
Andrew R. A. Conway
Andrew R. A. Conway Claremont Graduate University
Zachary Estes
Zachary Estes Bocconi University
Peter Suedfeld
Peter Suedfeld University of British Columbia
Uri Hasson
Uri Hasson Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to various impactful careers, including those addressing substance abuse and addiction. Online programs make it easier than ever to earn credentials while balancing work and personal commitments.

One popular option is becoming a substance abuse counselor. Educational requirements vary by state and city but often include a relevant bachelor’s or master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. For example, Corpus Christi substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for degree completion and state-specific licensure. If you’re interested in learning about local pathways, see what's involved in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Dallas or discover the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Denver.

For those planning to practice in Michigan, Detroit substance abuse counselor certification requirements outline the necessary qualifications and certifications. Exploring these paths can help you find the right online degree or certification to start a fulfilling career in mental health and addiction support.

Best Scientists Citing Sam Glucksberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles