World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
14184
World Ranking
5766
National Ranking
144

Connie R. Jimenez publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie R. Jimenez sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 313 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Connie R. Jimenez D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie R. Jimenez sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Connie R. Jimenez is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands, contributing extensively to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their research output includes 143 publications in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology and 142 in medicine, indicating a significant focus on interdisciplinary biomedical sciences.

Their subfields of study emphasize molecular biology with 95 publications, followed by spectroscopy (42), oncology (35), pulmonary and respiratory medicine (23), and cancer research (23). This diverse expertise positions Jimenez as an active researcher in both fundamental molecular mechanisms and clinical applications.

The main research topics covered by Jimenez include advanced proteomics techniques and applications (60 publications), mass spectrometry techniques and applications (24), and pancreatic and hepatic oncology research (24). They also explore cancer genomics and diagnostics, extracellular vesicles in disease, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, and treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Some of the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Jimenez are:

  • Urinary extracellular vesicles: A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles, 2021, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • High-dose intravenous vitamin C, a promising multi-targeting agent in the treatment of cancer, 2021, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
  • iq: an R package to estimate relative protein abundances from ion quantification in DIA-MS-based proteomics, 2020, Bioinformatics
  • Truncated FGFR2 is a clinically actionable oncogene in multiple cancers, 2022, Nature
  • Proteomic and Functional Studies Reveal Detyrosinated Tubulin as Treatment Target in Sarcomere Mutation-Induced Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2021, Circulation Heart Failure

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Jimenez include Sander R. Piersma, Thang V. Pham, Jaco C. Knol, Irene V. Bijnsdorp, and Alex A. Henneman, indicating active engagement in collaborative research networks.

Their work has been published in multiple venues with recurring publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 14 publications
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics - 5 publications
  • Cancers - 5 publications
  • Scientific Reports - 5 publications
  • Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research - 4 publications

Best Publications

  • Quantifying exosome secretion from single cells reveals a modulatory role for GPCR signaling

    Frederik Johannes Verweij;Frederik Johannes Verweij;Frederik Johannes Verweij;Maarten P. Bebelman;Maarten P. Bebelman;Connie R. Jimenez;Juan J. Garcia-Vallejo

  • Urinary extracellular vesicles : A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles

    Uta Erdbrügger;Charles J. Blijdorp;Irene V. Bijnsdorp;Francesc E. Borràs

  • Direct visualization by cryo-EM of the mycobacterial capsular layer: a labile structure containing ESX-1-secreted proteins.

    Musa Sani;Edith N G Houben;Jeroen Geurtsen;Jason Pierson

  • PPE and PE_PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium marinum are transported via the type VII secretion system ESX-5

    Abdallah M. Abdallah;Theo Verboom;Eveline M. Weerdenburg;Nicolaas C. Gey van Pittius

  • PPIB mutations cause severe osteogenesis imperfecta.

    Fleur S. van Dijk;Isabel M. Nesbitt;Eline H. Zwikstra;Peter G.J. Nikkels

  • Proteomics Analysis of Rat Brain Postsynaptic Density IMPLICATIONS OF THE DIVERSE PROTEIN FUNCTIONAL GROUPS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF SYNAPTIC PHYSIOLOGY

    Ka Wan Li;Martin P. Hornshaw;Roel C. Van der Schors;Rod Watson

  • Proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles: a comprehensive dataset.

    Davide Chiasserini;Jan R.T. van Weering;Sander R. Piersma;Thang V. Pham

  • On the beta-binomial model for analysis of spectral count data in label-free tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics

    Thang V. Pham;Sander R. Piersma;Marc Warmoes;Connie R. Jimenez

  • Direct molecular imaging of Lymnaea stagnalis nervous tissue at subcellular spatial resolution by mass spectrometry.

    A F Maarten Altelaar;Jan van Minnen;Connie R Jiménez;Ron M A Heeren

  • The Heterologous Siderophores Ferrioxamine B and Ferrichrome Activate Signaling Pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    María A. Llamas;Marion Sparrius;Roy Kloet;Connie R. Jiménez

  • Breast cancer classification by proteomic technologies: Current state of knowledge

    S.W. Lam;C.R. Jimenez;E. Boven

  • Composition of the type VII secretion system membrane complex

    Edith N. G. Houben;Edith N. G. Houben;Jovanka Bestebroer;Roy Ummels;Louis Wilson

  • Workflow comparison for label-free, quantitative secretome proteomics for cancer biomarker discovery: method evaluation, differential analysis, and verification in serum.

    Sander R. Piersma;Ulrike Fiedler;Simone Span;Andreas Lingnau

  • Neuropeptide expression and processing as revealed by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry of single neurons

    C. R. Jimenez;P. A. van Veelen;K. W. Li;W. C. Wildering

  • Proteomic Profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Identifies Nutrient-starvation-responsive Toxin–antitoxin Systems

    Jakob Albrethsen;Jeppe Agner;Sander R. Piersma;Peter Højrup

  • Essential Role of the ESX-5 Secretion System in Outer Membrane Permeability of Pathogenic Mycobacteria.

    Louis S. Ates;Roy Ummels;Susanna Commandeur;Robert van der Weerd

  • Sensing of latent EBV infection through exosomal transfer of 5′pppRNA

    S. Rubina Baglio;Monique A. J. van Eijndhoven;Danijela Koppers-Lalic;Jordi Berenguer

  • Exosomal ITGA3 interferes with non-cancerous prostate cell functions and is increased in urine exosomes of metastatic prostate cancer patients

    Irene V. Bijnsdorp;Albert A. Geldof;Mehrdad Lavaei;Sander R. Piersma

  • Interaction of 14-3-3 proteins with the Estrogen Receptor Alpha F domain provides a drug target interface

    Ingrid J. De Vries-van Leeuwen;Daniel da Costa Pereira;Koen D. Flach;Sander R. Piersma

  • Molecular Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Linda J.W. Bosch;Beatriz Carvalho;Remond J.A. Fijneman;Connie R. Jimenez

Frequent Co-Authors

Sander R. Piersma
Sander R. Piersma VU University Medical Center
Henk M.W. Verheul
Henk M.W. Verheul Radboud University
Ka Wan Li
Ka Wan Li Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henk L. Dekker
Henk L. Dekker University of Amsterdam
August B. Smit
August B. Smit Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Wilbert Bitter
Wilbert Bitter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Egbert F. Smit
Egbert F. Smit VU University Medical Center
Gerrit A. Meijer
Gerrit A. Meijer Netherlands Cancer Institute
Chris J. J. Mulder
Chris J. J. Mulder Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of career options in healthcare, research, and data management. For those interested in technology and healthcare, medical coding is a fast-growing path. Curious about earning potential? Find out what is medical coding salary and see if this field aligns with your goals.

Medical billing and coding careers are also in demand, but it’s important to weigh both sides of the job. Learn more about the daily realities and career satisfaction by reading is medical billing and coding worth it.

Prefer a broader role in healthcare data? An online health information management degree prepares you for positions that safeguard and analyze medical records—ideal for those who enjoy working at the intersection of science and information technology.

Interested in nutrition or dietetics? Discover the cost of masters degree in nutrition and determine if advanced study is a good fit for your budget and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Connie R. Jimenez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles