World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
24
Citations
2251
World Ranking
1711
National Ranking
856

Arthur Spirling publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Spirling sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 158 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Arthur Spirling D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Spirling sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 24 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur Spirling is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their academic work is concentrated in the field of Social Sciences, with significant contributions across subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, General Social Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, and Strategy and Management.

The research topics Arthur Spirling focuses on include Computational and Text Analysis Methods, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Media Influence and Politics, Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Word Embeddings: What Works, What Doesn't, and How to Tell the Difference for Applied Research," 2021, The Journal of Politics
  • "Why open-source generative AI models are an ethical way forward for science," 2023, Nature
  • "Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference," 2023, American Political Science Review
  • "Using proprietary language models in academic research requires explicit justification," 2023, Nature Computational Science
  • "Turning History into Data: Data Collection, Measurement, and Inference in HPE," 2021, Journal of Historical Political Economy

Frequent co-authors include Brandon Stewart, Pedro L. Rodríguez, Alexis Palmer, Matthew Connelly, and Raymond Hicks. Their collaboration with these scholars reflects an engagement with related research communities and interdisciplinary approaches.

Arthur Spirling's works have appeared in various academic venues, notably Political Analysis, The Journal of Politics, Nature, American Political Science Review, and Nature Computational Science. Political Analysis features their publications most frequently.

Best Publications

  • Text Preprocessing for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What to Do about It

    Matthew J. Denny;Arthur Spirling

  • UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons

    Arthur Spirling;Iain McLean

  • U.S. Treaty Making with American Indians: Institutional Change and Relative Power, 1784–1911

    Arthur Spirling

  • Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies

    Torun Dewan;Arthur Spirling

  • Word Embeddings: What works, what doesn't, and how to tell the difference for applied research

    Pedro L. Rodriguez;Pedro L. Rodriguez;Arthur Spirling;Arthur Spirling

  • Classification Accuracy as a Substantive Quantity of Interest: Measuring Polarization in Westminster Systems

    Andrew Jerel Peterson;Arthur Spirling

  • Measuring and Explaining Political Sophistication through Textual Complexity.

    Kenneth Benoit;Kevin Munger;Arthur Spirling

  • Identifying Intraparty Voting Blocs in the U.K. House of Commons

    Arthur Spirling;Kevin Quinn

  • Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–1915

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference

    Unknown

  • Democratization and Linguistic Complexity: The Effect of Franchise Extension on Parliamentary Discourse, 1832–1915

    Arthur Spirling

  • None of the Above The UK House of Commons votes on Reforming the House of Lords, February 2003 ⁄

    Iain McLean;Arthur P Spirling;Meg Russell

  • Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems: Inducements, Replacement and Discipline in the House of Commons, 1836–1910

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Incumbency Effects and the Strength of Party Preferences: Evidence from Multiparty Elections in the United Kingdom

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Electoral Security as a Determinant of Legislator Activity, 1832–1918: New Data and Methods for Analyzing British Political Development

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Bayesian Approaches for Limited Dependent Variable Change Point Problems

    Arthur P Spirling

  • None of the Above: The UK House of Commons votes on reforming the House of Lords

    I McLean;A Spirling;M Russell

  • Text Preprocessing for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What to Do about It

    Matthew James Denny;Arthur Spirling

  • Asking too much? The rhetorical role of questions in political discourse

    Justine Zhang;Arthur Spirling;Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil

  • The Rights and Wrongs of Roll Calls

    Arthur Spirling;Iain McLean

  • Testing the power of arguments in referendums: A Bradley–Terry approach

    Peter John Loewen;Daniel Rubenson;Arthur Spirling

  • Guarding the Guardians: Legislative Self-Policing and Electoral Corruption in Victorian Britain ∗

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • The Shadow Cabinet in Westminster Systems: Modeling Opposition Agenda Setting in the House of Commons, 1832–1915

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Diplomatic documents data for international relations: the Freedom of Information Archive Database:

    Matthew J Connelly;Raymond Hicks;Robert Jervis;Arthur Spirling

  • "Turning Points" in the Iraq Conflict: Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Political Science

    Arthur P Spirling

  • Estimating the Severity of the WikiLeaks U.S. Diplomatic Cables Disclosure

    Michael Gill;Arthur Spirling

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew C. Eggers
Andrew C. Eggers University of Chicago
Iain McLean
Iain McLean University of Oxford
Kenneth Benoit
Kenneth Benoit Singapore Management University
Robert Jervis
Robert Jervis Columbia University
Peter John Loewen
Peter John Loewen Cornell University
Kyunghyun Cho
Kyunghyun Cho New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and career opportunities. Many students find that branching into related fields can expand their job prospects and complement their core studies. For example, earning an online mathematics degree can sharpen your analytical and problem-solving skills—valuable assets in research, policymaking, and data analysis roles.

If you are passionate about managing information or fostering community learning, you might explore options for where can I study library science. This field often intersects with political advocacy, public policy, and information management careers.

History is another complementary discipline. Studying degrees in history can give you critical context on past political events and trends, strengthening your ability to interpret current issues and shape future policies.

Additionally, individuals interested in environmental policy may find robust opportunities by exploring high paying jobs for environmental science majors. Environmental advocacy and regulatory roles often require a solid understanding of both science and political frameworks, merging these academic paths for meaningful and lucrative careers.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur Spirling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles