D-Index & Metrics

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Law and Political Science D-index 26 Citations 4,066 91 World Ranking 684 National Ranking 15

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Politics
  • Democracy

His scientific interests lie mostly in Public administration, Political economy, Referendum, Democracy and Empirical research. He applies his multidisciplinary studies on Public administration and European integration in his research. His Political economy study incorporates themes from Government and Ethnic conflict, Politics.

His Referendum research incorporates themes from Microeconomics, Simple and Voting. His Democracy research includes themes of Incentive, Empirical evidence, Ethnic group and Spanish Civil War. His Empirical research research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Sample, Legislature and Law and economics.

His most cited work include:

  • In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference (190 citations)
  • Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies (159 citations)
  • Veto Players and Referendums around the World (126 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Public administration, Political economy, Politics, Law and Parliament. His studies in Public administration integrate themes in fields like Constitution, Referendum and Policy outcomes. Simon Hug combines subjects such as Treaty and Ratification with his study of Referendum.

The Political economy study combines topics in areas such as Democracy, Democratization, Government and Ethnic conflict, Ethnic group. Simon Hug interconnects Positive economics and Economic system in the investigation of issues within Politics. His Parliament study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Representation, Legislature and Voting, Roll call.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Public administration (30.71%)
  • Political economy (28.35%)
  • Politics (20.47%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Public administration (30.71%)
  • Law (17.32%)
  • Political economy (28.35%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Public administration, Law, Political economy, Voting and Legislature are his primary areas of study. His work deals with themes such as Test, Reputation, Public relations, Civilian casualties and Interdependence, which intersect with Public administration. His research in the fields of Human rights and Dissenting opinion overlaps with other disciplines such as Focus and Content.

His Political economy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Autonomy, Ethnic conflict, Ethnic group, Refugee and Scholarship. His research integrates issues of Parliament, Single-member district, Direct democracy and Election threshold in his study of Legislature. The subject of his Parliament research is within the realm of Politics.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late? (71 citations)
  • Conflict-induced IDPs and the Spread of Conflict (15 citations)
  • The politics of special purpose trust funds (10 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Politics
  • Statistics

Simon Hug mainly focuses on Public administration, Political economy, Roll call, Parliament and Legislature. The concepts of his Public administration study are interwoven with issues in Test, Voting, Politics and Public relations. His work carried out in the field of Test brings together such families of science as Government, Civil rights, Empirical research and Referendum.

His multidisciplinary approach integrates Political economy and Spatial diffusion in his work. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Futures studies, Whip and Legislative process. His Legislature research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Disapproval voting, Election threshold, Single-member district, Proxy voting and Weighted voting.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Scientists Citing Simon Hug

Simon Hix

Simon Hix

London School of Economics and Political Science

Publications: 16

Niklas Potrafke

Niklas Potrafke

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 12

Lars-Erik Cederman

Lars-Erik Cederman

ETH Zurich

Publications: 12

Claes H. de Vreese

Claes H. de Vreese

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 10

Robert Thomson

Robert Thomson

Monash University

Publications: 8

Alois Stutzer

Alois Stutzer

University of Basel

Publications: 8

Johannes Urpelainen

Johannes Urpelainen

Johns Hopkins University

Publications: 7

Catherine E. De Vries

Catherine E. De Vries

Bocconi University

Publications: 6

Lars P. Feld

Lars P. Feld

Walter Eucken Institut

Publications: 5

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch

University of Essex

Publications: 5

Uwe Sunde

Uwe Sunde

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 5

Stefan Voigt

Stefan Voigt

Universität Hamburg

Publications: 4

Scott Gates

Scott Gates

Peace Research Institute

Publications: 4

Arye L. Hillman

Arye L. Hillman

Bar-Ilan University

Publications: 4

Sebastian M. Saiegh

Sebastian M. Saiegh

University of California, San Diego

Publications: 4

Colin C. Williams

Colin C. Williams

University of Sheffield

Publications: 4

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.