D-Index & Metrics

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Law and Political Science D-index 42 Citations 24,368 74 World Ranking 184 National Ranking 119

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2016 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

1993 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Politics
  • Democracy

George Tsebelis spends much of his time researching Parliament, Politics, European integration, Veto and Law and economics. His Parliament study deals with Political economy intersecting with Roll call and Coalition building. His work in the fields of Single European Act overlaps with other areas such as Public administration and Legislature.

His study on Veto is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Presidential system. His Presidential system research integrates issues from Empirical research, Economic system and Institutional analysis. George Tsebelis combines subjects such as Comparative politics, Mathematical economics and Decision theory with his study of Law and economics.

His most cited work include:

  • Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (2629 citations)
  • Decision Making in Political Systems Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism (1715 citations)
  • Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics (743 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Veto, Public administration, Legislature, Politics and Law and economics. His Veto research includes elements of Government, Legislation, Parliament and Institutional analysis. His Public administration research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Treaty, Latin Americans, Presidential system and Political system.

His Legislature research includes themes of Voting, Power and Political economy. His Politics research entails a greater understanding of Law. His Law and economics research incorporates themes from Comparative politics, Decision theory and Bicameralism.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Veto (28.30%)
  • Public administration (27.36%)
  • Legislature (21.70%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2021)?

  • Constitution (10.38%)
  • Public administration (27.36%)
  • Veto (28.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Constitution, Public administration, Veto, Government and Law and economics. His work deals with themes such as Social science and Development economics, which intersect with Constitution. The study incorporates disciplines such as Legislature and Parliament, Politics in addition to Public administration.

George Tsebelis undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Politics and Special case in his work. His Veto study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Set. His study on Government also encompasses disciplines like

  • Ideology which connect with Presidential system, Chamber of Deputies, Bicameralism, Constitutional court and Power,
  • Political economy that intertwine with fields like Negotiation, Prime minister, Complete information and Status quo.

Between 2010 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Political Parties and Government Coalitions in the Americas (51 citations)
  • The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting (40 citations)
  • Lessons from the Greek crisis (38 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Politics
  • Democracy

George Tsebelis mainly focuses on Unanimity, Public administration, International economics, Empirical evidence and Treaty. His Unanimity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Complete information, Prime minister, Negotiation, Outcome and Economic system. His Public administration study incorporates themes from Legislature and Parliament, Politics.

Much of his study explores Politics relationship to Comparative research. His Empirical evidence study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Majority rule, Foreign policy and Corruption. His biological study deals with issues like Power over, which deal with fields such as Veto.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Scientists Citing George Tsebelis

Thomas König

Thomas König

University of Mannheim

Publications: 61

Simon Hix

Simon Hix

London School of Economics and Political Science

Publications: 41

Jonathan B. Slapin

Jonathan B. Slapin

University of Essex

Publications: 32

Simon Hug

Simon Hug

University of Geneva

Publications: 23

Adrian Vatter

Adrian Vatter

University of Bern

Publications: 23

Bernard Steunenberg

Bernard Steunenberg

Leiden University

Publications: 23

Witold J. Henisz

Witold J. Henisz

University of Pennsylvania

Publications: 21

Fritz W. Scharpf

Fritz W. Scharpf

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies

Publications: 21

Robert Thomson

Robert Thomson

Monash University

Publications: 19

Stefan Voigt

Stefan Voigt

Universität Hamburg

Publications: 19

Liesbet Hooghe

Liesbet Hooghe

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications: 19

Gerald Schneider

Gerald Schneider

University of Konstanz

Publications: 18

Marc Debus

Marc Debus

University of Mannheim

Publications: 17

Anne Rasmussen

Anne Rasmussen

University of Copenhagen

Publications: 17

Tanja A. Börzel

Tanja A. Börzel

Freie Universität Berlin

Publications: 17

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.