World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
9799
World Ranking
4087
National Ranking
294

Stacy M Carter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacy M Carter sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 199 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stacy M Carter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacy M Carter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stacy M Carter is affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia. Their research spans fields primarily within Medicine and Health Professions, focusing on subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Informatics, Oncology, and Artificial Intelligence. Their work covers a range of topics including Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Ethics in Clinical Research, Healthcare cost, quality, and practices, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, AI in cancer detection, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare.

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Chris Degeling
  • Annette Braunack-Mayer
  • Yves Saint James Aquino
  • Nehmat Houssami
  • Emma Kellie Frost

Key publication venues for Stacy M Carter comprise:

  • Health Expectations
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • Research Square
  • BMJ Health & Care Informatics

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Stacy M Carter include:

  • Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions, 2021, Patient
  • Exploring stakeholder attitudes towards AI in clinical practice, 2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • Clinician checklist for assessing suitability of machine learning applications in healthcare, 2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills, 2022, International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis, 2023, Social Science & Medicine

The profile of Stacy M Carter reflects a research agenda intersecting health professions with the implementation and ethical considerations of artificial intelligence. Their work includes systematic reviews, checklist development for clinical contexts, and explorations of stakeholder attitudes, contributing to the understanding of AI's role in healthcare settings.

Best Publications

  • Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research

    Stacy M. Carter;Miles Little

  • Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships

    Vikki A. Entwistle;Stacy M. Carter;Alan Cribb;Kirsten McCaffery

  • How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices

    Alexandra Sbaraini;Alexandra Sbaraini;Stacy M Carter;R Wendell Evans;Anthony Blinkhorn;Anthony Blinkhorn

  • Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making

    Jesse Jansen;Vasi Naganathan;Stacy L Carter;Andrew J McLachlan

  • Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Living With CKD

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Steven Chadban;Rowan G. Walker

  • The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care

    Stacy M. Carter;Wendy Rogers;Khin Than Win;Helen Frazer

  • Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.

    Christopher J Degeling;Stacy M Carter;Lucie Rychetnik

  • The challenge of overdiagnosis begins with its definition

    Stacy M Carter;Wendy Rogers;I Heath;Chris Degeling

  • Exploring stakeholder attitudes towards AI in clinical practice

    Unknown

  • Australian baby boomers’ expectations and plans for their old age

    Susan Quine;Stacy Carter

  • Evidence, Ethics, and Values: A Framework for Health Promotion

    Stacy M Carter;Lucie Rychetnik;Beverley Lloyd;Ian Kerridge

  • Patients’ priorities for health research: focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease

    Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Stacy M. Carter;Bronwyn Hall

  • Decision-Making Preferences and Deprescribing: Perspectives of Older Adults and Companions About Their Medicines.

    Kristie Weir;Brooke Nickel;Vasi Naganathan;Carissa Bonner

  • Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions.

    Stacy M. Carter;Patti Shih;Jane Williams;Chris Degeling

  • Experiences of dental care: what do patients value?

    Alexandra Sbaraini;Alexandra Sbaraini;Stacy M Carter;R Wendell Evans;Anthony Blinkhorn;Anthony Blinkhorn

  • Grounded theory and empirical ethics

    Stacy M Carter

  • “Avoid health warnings on all tobacco products for just as long as we can”: a history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay and dilute health warnings on cigarettes

    S Chapman;S M Carter

  • Walking the tightrope: Communicating overdiagnosis in modern healthcare

    Kirsten J. McCaffery;Jesse Jansen;Laura D. Scherer;Hazel Thornton

  • Communicating about screening

    Vikki A Entwistle;Stacy M Carter;Lyndal Trevena;Kathy Flitcroft

  • Going below the line: creating transportable brands for Australia’s dark market

    S M Carter

  • Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?

    Kathy Flitcroft;James Gillespie;Glenn P Salkeld;Stacy Carter;Stacy Carter

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirsten McCaffery
Kirsten McCaffery University of Sydney
Ian Kerridge
Ian Kerridge University of Sydney
Vikki Entwistle
Vikki Entwistle University of Aberdeen
Simon Chapman
Simon Chapman University of Sydney
Bjørn Hofmann
Bjørn Hofmann University of Oslo
Lyndal Trevena
Lyndal Trevena University of Sydney
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Paul Ward
Paul Ward Torrens University Australia
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to many rewarding career paths. Flexible online programs make it possible to balance studies with other commitments, and can accelerate your journey into professional roles. For those interested in mental health, psyd programs online are designed for students aiming to become licensed clinical psychologists. If you are passionate about supporting families and couples, consider how lmft programs prepare graduates for licensure as marriage and family therapists.

Many students are also drawn to backgrounds in psychology. Choosing from the online masters in clinical psychology allows you to train effectively while managing costs. For those seeking senior positions in education, the accelerated edd options can fast-track your entry to leadership and policy roles. These online pathways are ideal for motivated learners seeking flexible, reputable credentials in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Stacy M Carter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles