World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2926 2679 209 199 519 10727

Ian Kerridge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian Kerridge between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian Kerridge published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2012. 24 of the 661 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2012. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

661 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian Kerridge: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 4
1995 7
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 5
2001 9
2002 6
2003 6
2004 13
2005 17
2006 24
2007 11
2008 26
2009 21
2010 28
2011 32
2012 46
2013 37
2014 39
2015 41
2016 31
2017 33
2018 23
2019 18
2020 45
2021 29
2022 23
2023 32
2024 22
2025 23
2026 1
Total 661
Download as CSV

Ian Kerridge publications per year - data summary

  • Ian Kerridge, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, has 661 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 46 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1999 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 19.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.4 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 101 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2004: 59 publications (4.9 per year); 2005-2016: 353 publications (29.4 per year); 2017-2026: 249 publications (24.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ian Kerridge publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Kerridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 514–523 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 519 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12 519
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian Kerridge publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Ian Kerridge, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, records 519 publications - the 98th percentile of the discipline.
  • 98% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Ian Kerridge, and about 2% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Ian Kerridge ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Ian Kerridge D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Kerridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Ian Kerridge D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Ian Kerridge, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Sydney, records 49 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Ian Kerridge, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Ian Kerridge ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Ian Kerridge is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hematology, General Health Professions, Oncology, and Physiology. Their research covers a broad range of topics within medical science and ethics, emphasizing biomedical ethics, regulation, and clinical practice.

Kerridge's recent publication record includes influential papers across bioethics and hematology. Notable works include "An Ethics Framework for Making Resource Allocation Decisions Within Clinical Care: Responding to COVID-19" (2020, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry), "Public trust and global biobank networks" (2020, BMC Medical Ethics), and "Science at Warp Speed: Medical Research, Publication, and Translation During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry). They also contributed to hematology-focused studies such as "COVID-19 vaccine failure in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and monoclonal B-lymphocytosis; humoural and cellular immunity" (2021, British Journal of Haematology) and "Multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses in CLL and MBL improve immune responses with progressive and high seroconversion" (2022, Blood).

Frequent co-authors in Kerridge's research include Wendy Lipworth, Cameron Stewart, Matthew Greenwood, Andrew Spencer, and Paul A. Komesaroff. The collaboration with these researchers reflects a multidisciplinary approach bridging clinical, ethical, and biomedical perspectives.

Their publication venues commonly include Internal Medicine Journal, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, Blood, British Journal of Haematology, and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. These journals align with Kerridge's expertise in clinical medicine and medical ethics.

  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

  • Ian Kerridge (2020) An Ethics Framework for Making Resource Allocation Decisions Within Clinical Care: Responding to COVID-19, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
  • Ian Kerridge (2020) Public trust and global biobank networks, BMC Medical Ethics
  • Ian Kerridge (2020) Science at Warp Speed: Medical Research, Publication, and Translation During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
  • Ian Kerridge (2021) COVID-19 vaccine failure in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and monoclonal B-lymphocytosis; humoural and cellular immunity, British Journal of Haematology
  • Ian Kerridge (2022) Multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses in CLL and MBL improve immune responses with progressive and high seroconversion, Blood

  • Wendy Lipworth
  • Cameron Stewart
  • Matthew Greenwood
  • Andrew Spencer
  • Paul A. Komesaroff

  • Internal Medicine Journal
  • Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
  • Blood
  • British Journal of Haematology
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Best Publications

  • Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study

    Michel Attal;Paul G. Richardson;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Jesus San-Miguel

  • Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers

    Josephine M. Clayton;Karen M. Hancock;Phyllis N. Butow;Martin H.N. Tattersall

  • Ethics and Law for the Health Professions.

    I H Kerridge;Michael Peter Lowe;J McPhee

  • Advance care planning for cancer patients: a systematic review of perceptions and experiences of patients, families, and healthcare providers.

    Stephanie Johnson;Phyllis Butow;Ian Kerridge;Martin Tattersall

  • Ethics and evidence based medicine

    Ian Kerridge;Ian Kerridge;Michael Lowe;David Henry

  • Pre-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy.

    B George;N Pati;N Gilroy;M Ratnamohan

  • Interprofessionalism and ethics: consensus or clash of cultures?

    Rob Irvine;Ian Kerridge;John McPhee;Sonia Freeman

  • Implementing a One Health approach to emerging infectious disease: reflections on the socio-political, ethical and legal dimensions

    Christopher J Degeling;Christopher J Degeling;Jane Johnson;Ian Kerridge;Ian Kerridge;Andrew Wilson

  • Evidence, Ethics, and Values: A Framework for Health Promotion

    Stacy M Carter;Lucie Rychetnik;Beverley Lloyd;Ian Kerridge

  • Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death

    I Kerridge;P Saul;Michael Lowe;J McPhee

  • Ethical issues concerning the relationships between medical practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry.

    Paul A Komesaroff;Ian H Kerridge

  • A Phase 1 study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-leukemic activity of the anti-CD123 monoclonal antibody CSL360 in relapsed, refractory or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

    Simon Z He;Samantha Busfield;David S Ritchie;Mark S Hertzberg

  • Specific Unwillingness to Donate Eyes: The Impact of Disfigurement, Knowledge and Procurement on Corneal Donation

    M. Lawlor;M. Lawlor;I. Kerridge;R. Ankeny;T. A. Dobbins

  • Association between xenobiotic gene polymorphisms and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk.

    Ian Kerridge;Lisa Lincz;Fiona Scorgie;Danica K. Hickey

  • Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation

    Miles Richard Bore;Donald Munro;Ian Kerridge;David Alan Powis

  • Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies

    Wendy Lipworth;Wendy Lipworth;Rowena Forsyth;Ian Kerridge

  • Withdrawal and limitation of life-sustaining treatments in a paediatric intensive care unit and review of the literature

    Peter Moore;Ian Kerridge;Ian Kerridge;Jonathan Gillis;Stephen Jacobe

  • Ethics and Epistemology in Big Data Research.

    Wendy Lipworth;Paul H. Mason;Ian Kerridge;Ian Kerridge;John P. A. Ioannidis

  • Methionine synthase genetic polymorphism MS A2756G alters susceptibility to follicular but not diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma

    Lisa F. Lincz;Fiona E. Scorgie;Ian Kerridge;Rachelle Potts

  • The intention to hasten death: a survey of attitudes and practices of surgeons in Australia.

    Charles D Douglas;Ian H Kerridge;Katherine J Rainbird;John R McPhee

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Ward
Chris Ward Newcastle University
Richard O. Day
Richard O. Day University of New South Wales
Stacy M Carter
Stacy M Carter University of Wollongong
Andrew Spencer
Andrew Spencer Monash University
Kenneth F. Bradstock
Kenneth F. Bradstock Westmead Hospital
David Isaacs
David Isaacs Children's Hospital at Westmead
David Henry
David Henry Bond University
David Ritchie
David Ritchie Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert University of Sydney
Jennifer Fleming
Jennifer Fleming University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a range of online study options designed for flexibility and practicality. Many students are now seeking online master's programs for faster completion and the chance to balance work with study. These programs are especially popular in psychology, education, and social work.

If you’re looking for a faster route to a degree, accelerated online programs allow you to complete your studies in a shorter timeframe—potentially saving time and money. Such programs are ideal for motivated adults with prior college credits or relevant experience.

Students committed to making a difference in the community may consider social work. Fully accredited options like the most affordable msw programs online enable learners to advance their credentials without relocating or taking time off work.

For those drawn to behavior analysis or working with individuals with special needs, online bcba masters programs are accessible, affordable ways to qualify for national certification.

These online pathways offer flexibility, cost-savings, and preparation for diverse careers in helping professions, advocacy, research, and public service.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Kerridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles