World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
82840
World Ranking
6634
National Ranking
189

David Henry publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Henry sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Henry D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Henry sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1947 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David Henry is affiliated with Bond University in Australia and primarily works in the field of Medicine. Their research focuses on areas including Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, and Health.

The researcher's work covers significant topics related to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Antibiotic Use and Resistance, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and Health and Medical Research Impacts.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by David Henry include:

  • Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT): an international randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2020) published in The Lancet
  • Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: findings from real world studies (2021) published in The Medical Journal of Australia
  • Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19 specific and all-cause mortality in older Australians: a population based study (2023) published in The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
  • How do trainee doctors learn about research? Content analysis of Australian specialist colleges' intended research curricula (2020) published in BMJ Open
  • Transference of skills in robotic vs. laparoscopic simulation: a randomized controlled trial (2021) published in BMC Surgery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Henry include:

  • Paulina Stehlik
  • Sallie-Anne Pearson
  • Ximena Camacho
  • Paul Glasziou
  • Nicole Pratt

The main publication venues where David Henry has frequently published are:

  • The Medical Journal of Australia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nepal Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology
  • BMJ Open
  • PLoS ONE

David Henry has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 1947.

Best Publications

  • ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

    Jonathan A. C. Sterne;Miguel A Hernan;Barnaby C Reeves;Jelena Savovic;Jelena Savovic

  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

    David Atkins;Dana Best;Peter A Briss;Martin Eccles

  • AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

    Beverley J Shea;Beverley J Shea;Barnaby C Reeves;George Wells;Micere Thuku

  • AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

    Beverley J. Shea;Candyce Hamel;George A. Wells;Lex M. Bouter

  • Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

    David A Henry;Paul A Carless;Annette J Moxey;Dianne O'Connell

  • Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase: A systematic review of the observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2

    Patricia McGettigan;David Henry;David Henry

  • Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a collaborative meta-analysis.

    David Henry;Lynette L.Y. Lim;Luis A. Garcia Rodriguez;Susanne Perez Gutthann

  • Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.

    David Atkins;Martin Eccles;Signe Flottorp;Gordon H Guyatt

  • A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel

    David N. Juurlink;Tara Gomes;Dennis T. Ko;Dennis T. Ko;Paul E. Szmitko

  • Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering.

    Ray Moynihan;Iona Heath;David Henry

  • Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy

    Ray Moynihan;Jenny Doust;David Henry

  • Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.

    Patricia McGettigan;David Henry;David Henry;David Henry

  • Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

    Paul A Carless;David A Henry;Annette J Moxey;Dianne O'Connell

  • Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 disease

    D William Cameron;Margo Heath-Chiozzi;Sven Danner;Calvin Cohen

  • Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications

    Ray Moynihan;Lisa Bero;Dennis Ross-Degnan;David Henry

  • Consumption of NSAIDs and the development of congestive heart failure in elderly patients: an underrecognized public health problem.

    John Page;David Henry

  • Exposure to community violence and violence perpetration: the protective effects of family functioning.

    Deborah Gorman-Smith;David B. Henry;Patrick H. Tolan

  • Omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with hypertension: The Omapatrilat Cardiovascular Treatment vs. Enalapril (OCTAVE) trial

    John B. Kostis;John B. Kostis;Milton Packer;Milton Packer;Henry R. Black;Henry R. Black;Roland Schmieder;Roland Schmieder

  • Meta-Analyses of Therapies for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

    Ann Cranney;Peter Tugwell;George Wells;Andrew Willan

  • Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms.

    David Henry;Nancy Guerra;Rowell Huesmann;Patrick Tolan

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick H. Tolan
Patrick H. Tolan University of Virginia
Deborah Gorman-Smith
Deborah Gorman-Smith University of Chicago
Richard O. Day
Richard O. Day University of New South Wales
Christopher B. Keys
Christopher B. Keys DePaul University
Ian Kerridge
Ian Kerridge University of Sydney
Robert W. Platt
Robert W. Platt McGill University
Lauren S. Wakschlag
Lauren S. Wakschlag Northwestern University
Albert D. Farrell
Albert D. Farrell Virginia Commonwealth University
Brian Mustanski
Brian Mustanski Northwestern University
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open doors to a range of related online degrees and healthcare careers. For those interested in healthcare leadership, the top cahme-accredited mha programs offer a pathway to hospital administration and management. These programs are rigorous, recognized for quality, and increasingly available online.

Registered nurses aiming to advance their education without traditional barriers can look into rn to bsn no clinical hours options. These programs allow RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree with a flexible schedule and no on-site requirements, making career advancement more accessible.

For nurses seeking doctoral credentials, the shortest dnp program online and cheapest dnp programs offer efficient and affordable paths. These programs emphasize advanced practice, leadership, and research in a format that accommodates working professionals.

With these diverse online options, future healthcare professionals can find flexible, accredited pathways to achieve their educational and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing David Henry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles