World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin H.N. Tattersall

Martin H.N. Tattersall

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
34636
World Ranking
9280
National Ranking
280

Martin H.N. Tattersall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H.N. Tattersall sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 493 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin H.N. Tattersall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H.N. Tattersall sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin H.N. Tattersall was a researcher affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their academic work focused primarily on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and related subfields.

Their research interests centered particularly on topics including:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Throughout their career, Tattersall collaborated frequently with several other researchers. The most common coauthors included Sharon H. Nahm, Martin R. Stockler, Andrew Martin, Peter Grimison, and Peter T. Fox.

Their publications were predominantly featured in the journal Supportive Care in Cancer, where they contributed to at least three articles. Another publication appeared in the SSRN Electronic Journal. Notable papers include:

  • On the receiving end: have patient perceptions of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy changed since the twentieth century? (2022), Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Using three scenarios to explain life expectancy in advanced cancer: attitudes of patients, family members, and other healthcare professionals (2022), Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Preferences for life expectancy discussions following diagnosis with a life-threatening illness: a discrete choice experiment (2020), Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Using Three Scenarios to Explain Life Expectancy in Advanced Cancer: Attitudes of Patients, Family Members, and Other Healthcare Professionals (2021), SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.

    Jean Pierre Pignon;Rodrigo Arriagada;Daniel C. Ihde;David H. Johnson

  • Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies.

    Alan Coates;Val Gebski;James F. Bishop;Peter N. Jeal

  • Communicating With Realism and Hope: Incurable Cancer Patients' Views on the Disclosure of Prognosis

    Rebecca G. Hagerty;Phyllis N. Butow;Peter M. Ellis;Elizabeth A. Lobb

  • A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information

    Sharon M. Parker;Josephine M. Clayton;Karen Hancock;Sharon Walder

  • The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support

    P. N. Butow;M. Maclean;S. M. Dunn;M. H. N. Tattersall

  • Sharing decisions in cancer care.

    Melina Gattellari;Phyllis N Butow;Phyllis N Butow;Martin H.N Tattersall

  • Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature

    R. G. Hagerty;Phyllis N. Butow;P. M. Ellis;S. Dimitry

  • Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting.

    Rebecca G. Hagerty;Phyllis N. Butow;Peter A. Ellis;Elizabeth A. Lobb

  • On the receiving end. V: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993.

    A. M. Griffin;P. N. Butow;A. S. Coates;A. M. Childs

  • Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review

    Karen Hancock;Josephine M Clayton;Sharon M Parker;Sharon Wal der

  • Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer

    P. E. Schofield;P. N. Butow;J. F. Thompson;M. H. N. Tattersall

  • When the diagnosis is cancer: Patient communication experiences and preferences

    Phyllis N. Butow;John N. Kazemi;Linda J. Beeney;R N Anne-Marie Griffin

  • Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers

    Josephine M. Clayton;Karen M. Hancock;Phyllis N. Butow;Martin H.N. Tattersall

  • Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations.

    R.C. Laidsaar-Powell;P.N. Butow;S. Bu;C. Charles

  • When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?

    Melina Gattellari;Katie J. Voigt;Phyllis N. Butow;Martin H.N. Tattersall

  • Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues.

    P.N. Butow;R.F. Brown;S. Cogar;M.H.N. Tattersall

  • Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review.

    Josephine M. Clayton;Karen Hancock;Sharon Parker;Phyllis N. Butow

  • How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients.

    Holly Ryan;P. Schofield;Jill Cockburn;P. Butow

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prompt List to Help Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers to Ask Questions About Prognosis and End-of-Life Care

    Josephine M. Clayton;Phyllis N. Butow;Martin H.N. Tattersall;Rhonda J. Devine

  • Immunological Aspects of Cancer Chemotherapy

    Kenneth C. Calman;John F. Smyth;Martin H. N. Tattersall;Martin H. N. Tattersall

Frequent Co-Authors

Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney
Michael Boyer
Michael Boyer University of Utah
David C. Currow
David C. Currow Flinders University
David Goldstein
David Goldstein University of New South Wales
David W. P. Thomas
David W. P. Thomas University of Nottingham
Stephen J. Clarke
Stephen J. Clarke University of Sydney
Afaf Girgis
Afaf Girgis University of New South Wales
Ian Kerridge
Ian Kerridge University of Sydney
Alan S. Coates
Alan S. Coates University of Sydney
Linda J. Kristjanson
Linda J. Kristjanson Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to many rewarding pathways beyond the traditional MD route. Online education now makes it possible to advance your qualifications while balancing work and personal commitments.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness, an online BS in nutrition offers a flexible way to enter public health, clinical nutrition, or wellness coaching roles.

Healthcare professionals looking to move into leadership can benefit from top cahme accredited mha programs online, which prepare students for management and executive positions in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses seeking to boost their credentials can enroll in rn bsn online programs no clinicals. These programs are designed to expand your knowledge and career opportunities, with less emphasis on in-person requirements.

For those aiming for the highest level in nursing practice, accelerated dnp programs online provide a fast-track to leadership and advanced clinical roles.

Each of these online programs can offer flexible entry points into the medical and allied health fields, enabling you to tailor your education to your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin H.N. Tattersall

Recently Published Articles