World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes

Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 52 2413 2198 93 88 138 12640

Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2013. 5 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2013. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 8
2005 5
2006 12
2007 6
2008 4
2009 7
2010 2
2011 9
2012 9
2013 15
2014 7
2015 7
2016 10
2017 5
2018 7
2019 6
2020 5
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 5
Total 153
Download as CSV

Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 138
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138 52
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with specific attention to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health as well as General Health Professions.

The main topics of de Haes's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare. These topics are central to understanding the nature of care provided to patients facing serious illnesses and the communication dynamics between healthcare professionals and patients.

Among recent publications, de Haes co-authored the paper titled Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial, published in 2021 in The Oncologist. This work has been cited in the academic literature, indicating engagement with ongoing discussions in oncology and patient communication.

  • Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021, The Oncologist)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with de Haes include:

  • Inge Henselmans
  • Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven
  • Pomme E. A. van Maarschalkerweerd
  • Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
  • Dirkje W. Sommeijer

The primary venue for publication identified is The Oncologist, where de Haes has contributed at least one paper, supporting their focus on clinical oncology and communication within that context.

  • The Oncologist

Best Publications

  • Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review.

    Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen;Wendy Wesker;Cas Kruitwagen;Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes

  • Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life

    Mirjam A.G. Sprangers;Ellen B. de Regt;Frank Andries;Heleen M.E. van Agt

  • The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study

    Elsbeth Steenland;Jan Leer;Hans van Houwelingen;Wendy J. Post

  • Stress, satisfaction and burnout among Dutch medical specialists

    Mechteld R.M. Visser;Ellen M.A. Smets;Frans J. Oort;Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes

  • Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status.

    Karen I Van der Zee;Robbert Sanderman;Joost W Heyink;Hanneke de Haes

  • Predicting and preventing physician burnout: results from the United States and the Netherlands.

    Mark Linzer;Mechteld R.M. Visser;Frans J. Oort;Ellen M.A. Smets

  • Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes.

    Hanneke de Haes;Jozien Bensing

  • Cancer patients' trust in their physician-a review

    Marij A. Hillen;Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes;Ellen M. A. Smets

  • Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: The Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES)

    Christa Zimmermann;Lidia Del Piccolo;Jozien Bensing;Svein Bergvik

  • Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: a case for vulnerability.

    Hanneke de Haes

  • From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education

    Petra Verdonk;Yvonne W. M. Benschop;Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes;Toine L. M. Lagro-Janssen

  • Predictors of health care utilization in the chronically ill: a review of the literature.

    Angela G.E.M de Boer;Wouter Wijker;Hanneke C.J.M de Haes

  • Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial.

    Wilbert B. van den Hout;Yvette M. van der Linden;Elsbeth Steenland;Ruud G. J. Wiggenraad

  • Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes.

    Hanneke de Haes;Nelleke Koedoot

  • Development of the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences to code health providers' responses (VR-CoDES-P) to patient cues and concerns.

    Lidia Del Piccolo;Hanneke de Haes;Cathy Heaven;Jesse Jansen

  • Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views.

    Linda C. Zandbelt;Ellen M. A. Smets;Frans J. Oort;Mieke H. Godfried

  • Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life

    Sjaak Molenaar;Mirjam A. G. Sprangers;Emiel J. Rutgers;Ernest J. T. Luiten

  • Health-Related Quality of Life Parameters As Prognostic Factors in a Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Population: An International Multicenter Study

    Fabio Efficace;Patrick Therasse;Martine J. Piccart;Corneel Coens

  • The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients

    Nelleke Koedoot;Sjaak Molenaar;Paul Oosterveld;Piet Bakker

  • How response shift may affect the measurement of change in fatigue.

    Mechteld R.M Visser;Ellen M.A Smets;Mirjam A.G Sprangers;Hanneke J.C.J.M de Haes

  • Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?

    Atie Van Den Brink‐Muinen;Sandra M. Van Dulmen;Hanneke C.J.M. De Haes;Adriaan Ph. Visser

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen M. A. Smets
Ellen M. A. Smets University of Amsterdam
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers University of Amsterdam
Frans J. Oort
Frans J. Oort University of Amsterdam
Julia C.M. van Weert
Julia C.M. van Weert University of Amsterdam
Adriaan Visser
Adriaan Visser Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences
Hein Putter
Hein Putter Leiden University Medical Center
Anne M. Stiggelbout
Anne M. Stiggelbout Leiden University Medical Center
Rolf H. Sijmons
Rolf H. Sijmons University of Groningen
Jozien M. Bensing
Jozien M. Bensing Utrecht University
Bert Garssen
Bert Garssen University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Social Sciences and Humanities is more accessible than ever, thanks to a wide range of online degree options. Many students opt for programs such as an msw (Master of Social Work) for careers in social services and community advocacy. These programs offer flexibility, allowing you to balance studies with work and other commitments.

For those interested in behavior analysis, consider bcba programs, which prepare graduates for roles in clinical, educational, and organizational settings. If you want to complete your studies faster, explore an accelerated msw program online or look into accelerated psychology programs online to save time and enter the workforce sooner.

Online degrees open up diverse career pathways in counseling, education, clinical practice, and research. They also help learners from all backgrounds access high-quality education at their own pace and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles