World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jozien M. Bensing

Jozien M. Bensing

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
28668
World Ranking
9419
National Ranking
367

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
97
Citations
28730
World Ranking
115
National Ranking
5

Jozien M. Bensing publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jozien M. Bensing sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 360 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jozien M. Bensing D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jozien M. Bensing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2007 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2006 - Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council

Overview

Jozien M. Bensing is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their scientific contributions and professional activities focus on research scopes that align with the academic environment of this institution.

This researcher has received notable recognition through awards such as the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences membership, awarded in 2007, and the Spinoza Prize from the Dutch Research Council in 2006.

There is no data available listing recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues related to their work. Additionally, information about book publications, main fields and subfields of study, or main topics of work has not been provided.

The absence of details regarding individual publications or specific research topics implies a focus on broader academic involvement at Utrecht University and a significant standing demonstrated by prestigious awards within the Dutch scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review

    Frans Derksen;Jozien Bensing;Antoine Lagro-Janssen

  • Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine.

    Jozien Bensing

  • Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: A review of the literature.

    Peter F.M. Verhaak;Jan J. Kerssens;Joost Dekker;Marjolijn J. Sorbi

  • Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews.

    Sandra van Dulmen;Emmy M Sluijs;Liset van Dijk;Denise Dt De Ridder

  • Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries

    Myriam Deveugele;Anselm Derese;Atie van den Brink-Muinen;Jozien Bensing

  • A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries

    Francesca Moretti;Liesbeth van Vliet;Jozien Bensing;Giuseppe Deledda

  • Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care.

    Jozien Bensing

  • Analyzing the "nature" and "specific effectiveness" of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda.

    Melanie Neumann;Jozien Bensing;Stewart Mercer;Nicole Ernstmann

  • A review of successful aging models: proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy.

    Carolijn Ouwehand;Denise T.D. de Ridder;Jozien M. Bensing

  • Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes.

    Hanneke de Haes;Jozien Bensing

  • Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice.

    G.P. Westert;F.G. Schellevis;D.H. de Bakker;P.P. Groenewegen

  • Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression—The patients' perspective explored

    Marijn A. Prins;Peter F. M. Verhaak;Jozien M. Bensing;Klaas van der Meer

  • Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills. A review of evaluation studies.

    R L Hulsman;W J G Ros;J A M Winnubst;J M Bensing

  • Help seeking for emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents: a review of recent literature.

    Marieke Zwaanswijk;Peter F. M. Verhaak;Jozien M. Bensing;Jan van der Ende

  • Evaluation of communication training programs in nursing care: a review of the literature.

    Irma P.M Kruijver;Ada Kerkstra;Anneke L Francke;Jozien M Bensing

  • Patient preference for genders of health professionals.

    Jan J. Kerssens;Jozien M. Bensing;Margriet G. Andela

  • Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: The Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES)

    Christa Zimmermann;Lidia Del Piccolo;Jozien Bensing;Svein Bergvik

  • Gender Differences in Practice Style: A Dutch Study of General Practitioners

    J M Bensing;A van den Brink-Muinen;D H de Bakker

  • Factors associated with adolescent mental health service need and utilization

    Marieke Zwaanswijk;Jan Van Der Ende;Peter F.M. Verhaak;Jozien M. Bensing

  • Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

    Kiek Tates;Marieke Zwaanswijk;Roel Otten;Sandra van Dulmen

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
Julia C.M. van Weert
Julia C.M. van Weert University of Amsterdam
Adriaan Visser
Adriaan Visser Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences
Gerard H.A. Visser
Gerard H.A. Visser Utrecht University
Frank C. Verhulst
Frank C. Verhulst Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan van der Ende
Jan van der Ende Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frits A. Beemer
Frits A. Beemer Utrecht University
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the growth of digital education, students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities have more options than ever to pursue their passions and advance their careers remotely. Online degree programs combine flexibility with academic rigor, opening doors for those balancing work, family, or other responsibilities.

Many learners begin with online accelerated bachelor's degree programs, allowing them to complete their undergraduate studies faster and enter the workforce sooner. For those seeking to specialize, various online master programs let students earn advanced credentials in as little as one year.

Psychology remains a popular field, with opportunities to choose from the best online masters in psychology that fit diverse career interests, whether clinical work, research, or human resources. For experienced educators or those aspiring to leadership in academia, online doctorate of education programs provide a pathway to top-level administrative and teaching roles.

Whether you are starting your journey or moving toward advanced specialization, these online options offer affordability, flexibility, and pathways to meaningful, impactful careers in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jozien M. Bensing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles