World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julia C.M. van Weert

Julia C.M. van Weert

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
8741
World Ranking
3174
National Ranking
131

Julia C.M. van Weert publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia C.M. van Weert sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julia C.M. van Weert D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia C.M. van Weert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia C.M. van Weert is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a focus on General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their scholarly efforts are situated within key subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and Epidemiology. Their main topics of interest include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Media Influence and Health, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, and Patient Dignity and Privacy.

Julia C.M. van Weert has contributed publications to several journals, most frequently to Patient Education and Counseling, where they have 15 publications. Other common venues include the Journal of Medical Internet Research with 5 publications, European Geriatric Medicine with 4, International Journal of Medical Informatics with 3, and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making with 3 publications.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Annemiek J. Linn, Nathalie van der Velde, Barbara C. Schouten, Stephanie Medlock, and Ellen M.A. Smets.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Julia C.M. van Weert include:

  • Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy, 2020, Patient Education and Counseling
  • Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review, 2021, BMC Geriatrics
  • Advancing urban mental health research: from complexity science to actionable targets for intervention, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Barriers and facilitators influencing medication-related CDSS acceptance according to clinicians: A systematic review, 2021, International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • Investigating the feasibility of idiographic network models., 2022, Psychological Methods

Best Publications

  • Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: A systematic review of the literature

    Nicola Diviani;Bas Van Den Putte;Stefano Giani;Julia C.M. Van Weert

  • The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature

    Marcia Vervloet;Annemiek J Linn;Julia C M van Weert;Dinny H de Bakker

  • Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Arnstein Finset;Hayden Bosworth;Phyllis Butow;Pål Gulbrandsen

  • Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities?

    Nadine Bol;Natali Helberger;Julia C. M. van Weert

  • The Effectiveness of Health Animations in Audiences With Different Health Literacy Levels: An Experimental Study

    Corine S. Meppelink;Julia C. M. van Weert;Carola J. Haven;Edith G. Smit

  • Behavioral and Mood Effects of Snoezelen Integrated into 24‐Hour Dementia Care

    Julia C. M. Van Weert;Alexandra M. Van Dulmen;Peter M. M. Spreeuwenberg;Miel W. Ribbe

  • The effects of psychosocial methods on depressed, aggressive and apathetic behaviors of people with dementia: a systematic review

    Renate Verkaik;Julia C. M. van Weert;Anneke L. Francke

  • The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature.

    Kim Brandes;Annemiek J. Linn;Phyllis N. Butow;Julia C. M. van Weert

  • Does Age Really Matter? Recall of Information Presented to Newly Referred Patients With Cancer

    Jesse Jansen;Phyllis N. Butow;Julia C.M. van Weert;Sandra van Dulmen

  • Interventions to improve recall of medical information in cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature.

    Nienke van der Meulen;Jesse Jansen;Sandra van Dulmen;Jozien Bensing

  • Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Julia C. M. van Weert;Barbara C. van Munster;Barbara C. van Munster;Remco Sanders;René Spijker;René Spijker

  • Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.

    Ruth E. Pel-Littel;Marjolein Snaterse;Nelly Marela Teppich;Bianca M. Buurman;Bianca M. Buurman

  • Exploring the role of health literacy in the evaluation of online health information: Insights from a mixed-methods study

    Nicola Diviani;Bas van den Putte;Bas van den Putte;Corine S. Meppelink;Julia C.M. van Weert

  • Effects of eHealth Interventions on Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Annemiek J Linn;Marcia Vervloet;Liset van Dijk;Edith G Smit

  • Effects of snoezelen, integrated in 24 h dementia care, on nurse–patient communication during morning care

    Julia C.M. van Weert;Alexandra M. van Dulmen;Peter M.M. Spreeuwenberg;Miel W. Ribbe

  • Recall in Older Cancer Patients: Measuring Memory for Medical Information

    Jesse Jansen;Julia van Weert;Nienke van der Meulen;Sandra van Dulmen

  • Should We Be Afraid of Simple Messages? The Effects of Text Difficulty and Illustrations in People With Low or High Health Literacy

    Corine S. Meppelink;Edith G. Smit;Bianca M. Buurman;Julia C. M. van Weert

  • Advancing urban mental health research: from complexity science to actionable targets for intervention.

    Junus M van der Wal;Claudia D van Borkulo;Marie K Deserno;Marie K Deserno;Josefien J F Breedvelt

  • Emotional and informational patient cues: the impact of nurses' responses on recall.

    Jesse Jansen;Julia C.M. van Weert;Judith de Groot;Sandra van Dulmen

  • Older cancer patients' information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals

    Elise R Posma;Julia C M van Weert;Jesse Jansen;Jozien M Bensing

  • Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study

    Sifra Bolle;Geke Romijn;Ellen M A Smets;Eugene F Loos

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen M. A. Smets
Ellen M. A. Smets University of Amsterdam
Edith G. Smit
Edith G. Smit University of Amsterdam
Jozien M. Bensing
Jozien M. Bensing Utrecht University
Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes
Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes University of Amsterdam
Rose-Marie Dröes
Rose-Marie Dröes University of Amsterdam
Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney
Jeroen Lakerveld
Jeroen Lakerveld University of Amsterdam
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Gert-Jan de Bruijn
Gert-Jan de Bruijn University of Amsterdam
Rens Vliegenthart
Rens Vliegenthart Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities can lead to a wide variety of fulfilling careers—from clinical social work to applied behavior analysis and psychology. Fortunately, there are flexible and affordable online options for those looking to advance their education or make a career change.

Many students are searching for the cheapest online master's in social work to reduce costs while gaining essential skills. If you're interested in behavior analysis, consider finding the cheapest bcba online program to qualify for board certification in this growing field.

Those aiming to enter the workforce quickly may benefit from exploring accelerated msw programs that allow you to earn your degree in less time. Similarly, there are fast psychology degree options online for students eager to launch a career in mental health, counseling, research, or related fields.

By comparing program length, cost, and accreditation, you can choose a pathway that matches your career goals and life situation.

Best Scientists Citing Julia C.M. van Weert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles