World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3370 3102 141 134 178 10111

Edith G. Smit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edith G. Smit between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edith G. Smit published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 12 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1996 2025

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edith G. Smit: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 5
2000 4
2001 3
2002 4
2003 7
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 8
2008 3
2009 15
2010 15
2011 19
2012 5
2013 11
2014 9
2015 17
2016 16
2017 12
2018 4
2019 11
2020 4
2021 4
2022 6
2023 3
2024 8
2025 4
Total 208
Download as CSV

Edith G. Smit publications per year - data summary

  • Edith G. Smit, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Amsterdam, has 208 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 19 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996 and 1997, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 30 years in the span carries no publications at all (1998).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.2 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 25 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2005: 30 publications (3.0 per year); 2006-2015: 106 publications (10.6 per year); 2016-2025: 72 publications (7.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Edith G. Smit publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith G. Smit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 178
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Edith G. Smit publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Edith G. Smit, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Amsterdam, records 178 publications - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edith G. Smit, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Edith G. Smit ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Edith G. Smit D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith G. Smit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Edith G. Smit D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Edith G. Smit, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Amsterdam, records 47 D-Index - the 59th percentile of the discipline.
  • 59% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edith G. Smit, and about 41% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Edith G. Smit ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Edith G. Smit is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and works primarily within the social sciences, with a strong focus on business, management, accounting, and psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, marketing, applied psychology, communication, and clinical psychology.

Smit's recent scholarly contributions include research on chatbot persuasion, virtual reality in consumer experiences, privacy behaviors, and the modalities of virtual assistant interactions. Notable papers are:

  • "I Am Here to Assist You Today": The Role of Entity, Interactivity and Experiential Perceptions in Chatbot Persuasion (2020, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media)
  • Brands in virtual reality games: Affective processes within computer-mediated consumer experiences (2020, Journal of Business Research)
  • No to cookies: Empowering impact of technical and legal knowledge on rejecting tracking cookies (2021, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • Is voice really persuasive? The influence of modality in virtual assistant interactions and two alternative explanations (2022, Internet Research)
  • Advertising and privacy: an overview of past research and a research agenda (2022, International Journal of Advertising)

They have contributed to multiple publication venues, with a recurring presence in the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, BMC Medicine, and Media Psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach combining media studies, health, and social science perspectives.

Their research topics intersect with:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Media Influence and Health
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Frequent collaborators include Guda van Noort, Carolin Ischen, Anne L. Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, and Michel Klein, with multiple joint publications across different thematic areas.

Best Publications

  • Introducing COBRAs: exploring motivations for brand-related social media use

    Daniël G. Muntinga;Marjolein Moorman;Edith G. Smit

  • Brand relationship quality and its value for personal contact.

    Edith Smit;Fred Bronner;Maarten Tolboom

  • A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them

    Marieke L. Fransen;Peeter W.J. Verlegh;Amna Kirmani;Edith G. Smit

  • The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting

    Marjolein Moorman;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • The Effectiveness of Health Animations in Audiences With Different Health Literacy Levels: An Experimental Study

    Corine S. Meppelink;Julia C. M. van Weert;Carola J. Haven;Edith G. Smit

  • Effects of television brand placement on brand image

    Eva A. van Reijmersdal;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • Understanding online behavioural advertising

    Edith G. Smit;Guda Van Noort;Hilde A.M. Voorveld

  • A new branch of advertising: reviewing factors that influence reactions to product placement

    E.A. van Reijmersdal;P.C. Neijens;E.G. Smit

  • Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework.

    Marieke L. Fransen;Edith G. Smit;Peeter W. J. Verlegh

  • "I was Right about Vaccination": Confirmation Bias and Health Literacy in Online Health Information Seeking.

    Corine S Meppelink;Edith G Smit;Marieke L Fransen;Nicola Diviani

  • Under-vaccinated groups in Europe and their beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination; two systematic reviews

    N. Fournet;L. Mollema;W. L. Ruijs;I A. Harmsen

  • Effects of Advertising Likeability: A 10-Year Perspective

    Edith G. Smit;Lex van Meurs;Peter C. Neijens

  • Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism

    Stefan F. Bernritter;Peeter W.J. Verlegh;Edith G. Smit

  • The privacy trade-off for mobile app downloads: The roles of app value, intrusiveness, and privacy concerns

    Verena M. Wottrich;Eva A. van Reijmersdal;Edith G. Smit

  • Readers' Reactions to Mixtures of Advertising and Editorial Content in Magazines

    M A Eva van Reijmersdal;Peter Neijens;Edith Smit

  • How media factors affect audience responses to brand placement

    E. van Reijmersdal;E. Smit;P. Neijens

  • Effects of eHealth Interventions on Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Annemiek J Linn;Marcia Vervloet;Liset van Dijk;Edith G Smit

  • Opening the black box: Understanding cross-media effects

    Hilde A.M. Voorveld;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • The relation between actual and perceived interactivity: what makes the websites of top global brands truly interactive?

    Hilde A. M. Voorveld;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • It Is All in the Name: A Study of Consumers' Responses to Personalized Communication

    Ewa Maslowska;Edith G. Smit;Bas van den Putte

  • Today's practice of brand placement and the industry behind it

    E. Smit;E. van Reijmersdal;P. Neijens

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Neijens
Peter Neijens University of Amsterdam
Julia C.M. van Weert
Julia C.M. van Weert University of Amsterdam
Eva A. van Reijmersdal
Eva A. van Reijmersdal University of Amsterdam
Guda van Noort
Guda van Noort University of Amsterdam
Rob Horne
Rob Horne University College London
Micael Dahlén
Micael Dahlén Stockholm School of Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse online degree options and career routes in the USA. For those interested in mental health or counseling fields, pursuing a degree in psychology, social work, or marriage and family therapy can be a great starting point.

Tuition costs and program accessibility are major factors to consider. There are affordable online programs such as the cheapest online degree in psychology, making this academic path more accessible than ever. For those interested in social work, finding an online msw that is easier to enroll in can help quickly launch a career in community services.

Advanced credentials, such as the doctorate in psychology, are becoming more available through quality yet accessible programs like the cheapest psyd programs. Students focused on therapy or counseling may also consider mft programs online that offer accelerated paths.

These online degree pathways help students meet licensure needs, lower costs, and adapt to a variety of professional goals in the ever-expanding fields of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Edith G. Smit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles