World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
10111
World Ranking
3370
National Ranking
141

Edith G. Smit publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith G. Smit sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Edith G. Smit D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith G. Smit sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edith G. Smit is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and works primarily within the social sciences, with a strong focus on business, management, accounting, and psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, marketing, applied psychology, communication, and clinical psychology.

Smit's recent scholarly contributions include research on chatbot persuasion, virtual reality in consumer experiences, privacy behaviors, and the modalities of virtual assistant interactions. Notable papers are:

  • "I Am Here to Assist You Today": The Role of Entity, Interactivity and Experiential Perceptions in Chatbot Persuasion (2020, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media)
  • Brands in virtual reality games: Affective processes within computer-mediated consumer experiences (2020, Journal of Business Research)
  • No to cookies: Empowering impact of technical and legal knowledge on rejecting tracking cookies (2021, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • Is voice really persuasive? The influence of modality in virtual assistant interactions and two alternative explanations (2022, Internet Research)
  • Advertising and privacy: an overview of past research and a research agenda (2022, International Journal of Advertising)

They have contributed to multiple publication venues, with a recurring presence in the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, BMC Medicine, and Media Psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach combining media studies, health, and social science perspectives.

Their research topics intersect with:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Media Influence and Health
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Frequent collaborators include Guda van Noort, Carolin Ischen, Anne L. Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, and Michel Klein, with multiple joint publications across different thematic areas.

Best Publications

  • Introducing COBRAs: exploring motivations for brand-related social media use

    Daniël G. Muntinga;Marjolein Moorman;Edith G. Smit

  • Brand relationship quality and its value for personal contact.

    Edith Smit;Fred Bronner;Maarten Tolboom

  • A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them

    Marieke L. Fransen;Peeter W.J. Verlegh;Amna Kirmani;Edith G. Smit

  • The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting

    Marjolein Moorman;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • The Effectiveness of Health Animations in Audiences With Different Health Literacy Levels: An Experimental Study

    Corine S. Meppelink;Julia C. M. van Weert;Carola J. Haven;Edith G. Smit

  • Effects of television brand placement on brand image

    Eva A. van Reijmersdal;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • Understanding online behavioural advertising

    Edith G. Smit;Guda Van Noort;Hilde A.M. Voorveld

  • A new branch of advertising: reviewing factors that influence reactions to product placement

    E.A. van Reijmersdal;P.C. Neijens;E.G. Smit

  • Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework.

    Marieke L. Fransen;Edith G. Smit;Peeter W. J. Verlegh

  • "I was Right about Vaccination": Confirmation Bias and Health Literacy in Online Health Information Seeking.

    Corine S Meppelink;Edith G Smit;Marieke L Fransen;Nicola Diviani

  • Under-vaccinated groups in Europe and their beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination; two systematic reviews

    N. Fournet;L. Mollema;W. L. Ruijs;I A. Harmsen

  • Effects of Advertising Likeability: A 10-Year Perspective

    Edith G. Smit;Lex van Meurs;Peter C. Neijens

  • Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism

    Stefan F. Bernritter;Peeter W.J. Verlegh;Edith G. Smit

  • The privacy trade-off for mobile app downloads: The roles of app value, intrusiveness, and privacy concerns

    Verena M. Wottrich;Eva A. van Reijmersdal;Edith G. Smit

  • Readers' Reactions to Mixtures of Advertising and Editorial Content in Magazines

    M A Eva van Reijmersdal;Peter Neijens;Edith Smit

  • How media factors affect audience responses to brand placement

    E. van Reijmersdal;E. Smit;P. Neijens

  • Effects of eHealth Interventions on Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Annemiek J Linn;Marcia Vervloet;Liset van Dijk;Edith G Smit

  • Opening the black box: Understanding cross-media effects

    Hilde A.M. Voorveld;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • The relation between actual and perceived interactivity: what makes the websites of top global brands truly interactive?

    Hilde A. M. Voorveld;Peter C. Neijens;Edith G. Smit

  • It Is All in the Name: A Study of Consumers' Responses to Personalized Communication

    Ewa Maslowska;Edith G. Smit;Bas van den Putte

  • Today's practice of brand placement and the industry behind it

    E. Smit;E. van Reijmersdal;P. Neijens

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Neijens
Peter Neijens University of Amsterdam
Julia C.M. van Weert
Julia C.M. van Weert University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse online degree options and career routes in the USA. For those interested in mental health or counseling fields, pursuing a degree in psychology, social work, or marriage and family therapy can be a great starting point.

Tuition costs and program accessibility are major factors to consider. There are affordable online programs such as the cheapest online degree in psychology, making this academic path more accessible than ever. For those interested in social work, finding an online msw that is easier to enroll in can help quickly launch a career in community services.

Advanced credentials, such as the doctorate in psychology, are becoming more available through quality yet accessible programs like the cheapest psyd programs. Students focused on therapy or counseling may also consider mft programs online that offer accelerated paths.

These online degree pathways help students meet licensure needs, lower costs, and adapt to a variety of professional goals in the ever-expanding fields of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Edith G. Smit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles