World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
13144
World Ranking
1771
National Ranking
11

Peter J. Schulz publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Schulz sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 321 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter J. Schulz D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Schulz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Schulz is affiliated with the Universita della Svizzera Italiana in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and health professions, with significant contributions to health literacy, patient-provider communication, and the impact of digital technologies on health behaviors.

The main fields of study for Peter J. Schulz include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Health Professions

Within these fields, their work covers subfields such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Education

Key topics of their research focus on:

  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on health literacy and digital communication, including:

  • "Global Sentiments Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Trends," 2020, published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
  • "Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2022, published in Frontiers in Public Health
  • "Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies," 2020, published in Telematics and Informatics
  • "Generation Gaps in Digital Health Literacy and Their Impact on Health Information Seeking Behavior and Health Empowerment in Hungary," 2021, published in Frontiers in Public Health
  • "Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients' Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study," 2020, published in Journal of Medical Internet Research

Peter J. Schulz has collaborated frequently with co-authors such as:

  • Serena Petrocchi
  • Laura Marciano
  • Angela Chang
  • May O. Lwin
  • Anne-Linda Camerini

Their work is regularly published in journals including:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • BMC Public Health
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Computers in Human Behavior

In addition to articles, Peter J. Schulz has published a book titled Worse Than Ignorance in 2024 under Cambridge University Press. This reflects their engagement with academic publishing beyond journal articles.

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.

    Yi-Ru Regina Chen;Peter J Schulz

  • Mapping mHealth Research: A Decade of Evolution

    Maddalena Fiordelli;Nicola Diviani;Peter J Schulz

  • Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence

    Lilla Náfrádi;Kent Nakamoto;Peter J. Schulz

  • Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins.

    Peter J. Schulz;Kent Nakamoto

  • Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Unknown

  • The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review

    Sarah Mantwill;Silvia Monestel-Umaña;Peter J. Schulz

  • Global Sentiments Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Trends.

    May Oo Lwin;Jiahui Lu;Anita Sheldenkar;Peter Johannes Schulz

  • The Role of Health Literacy in Diabetes Knowledge, Self-Care, and Glycemic Control: a Meta-analysis

    Laura Marciano;Anne-Linda Camerini;Peter J Schulz

  • The Effect of Social Support Features and Gamification on a Web-Based Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ahmed Allam;Zlatina Kostova;Kent Nakamoto;Peter Johannes Schulz

  • Defining and measuring health literacy: how can we profit from other literacy domains?

    Anne-Linda Frisch;Luca Camerini;Nicola Diviani;Peter J. Schulz

  • Online Health Information Seeking in the Context of the Medical Consultation in Switzerland

    Maria Caiata-Zufferey;Andrea Abraham;Kathrin Sommerhalder;Peter J Schulz

  • Quality of Online Pharmacies and Websites Selling Prescription Drugs: A Systematic Review

    Grazia Orizio;Anna Merla;Peter J Schulz;Umberto Gelatti

  • Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

    Anne-Linda Camerini;Laura Marciano;Anna Carrara;Peter J. Schulz

  • Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

    Laura Marciano;Peter J Schulz;Anne-Linda Camerini

  • Theories and models of communication

    Paul Cobley;Peter J. Schulz

  • Strategic Uses of Facebook in Zika Outbreak Communication: Implications for the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model

    May Oo Lwin;Jiahui Lu;Anita Sheldenkar;Peter J. Schulz

  • Debiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review

    Ramona Ludolph;Peter J Schulz

  • The Impact of Search Engine Selection and Sorting Criteria on Vaccination Beliefs and Attitudes: Two Experiments Manipulating Google Output

    Ahmed Allam;Peter Johannes Schulz;Kent Nakamoto

  • Interactive sections of an Internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: randomized controlled trial.

    Silvia Riva;Anne-Linda Camerini;Ahmed Allam;Peter J Schulz

  • Differential effects of health knowledge and health empowerment over patients' self-management and health outcomes: a cross-sectional evaluation.

    Luca Camerini;Peter J. Schulz;Kent Nakamoto

  • Distorted food pyramid in kids programmes: a content analysis of television advertising watched in Switzerland.

    Simone K. Keller;Peter J. Schulz

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Zanetti
Alessandro Zanetti University of Milan
May O. Lwin
May O. Lwin Nanyang Technological University
Arnstein Finset
Arnstein Finset University of Oslo
Gary L. Kreps
Gary L. Kreps George Mason University
Hye-Jin Paek
Hye-Jin Paek Hanyang University
Gabriella Pravettoni
Gabriella Pravettoni University of Milan
Nawi Ng
Nawi Ng University of Gothenburg
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Steven Nordin
Steven Nordin Umeå University
Matthew Tingchi Liu
Matthew Tingchi Liu University of Macau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up numerous pathways for both academic advancement and professional growth. There are a variety of flexible programs available that accommodate different interests and schedules.

For those interested in the field of psychology, accredited psyd psychology programs allow students to focus on clinical skills and prepare for licensure as practicing psychologists. If you are considering a career in marriage and family therapy, you can pursue one of the online mft degrees that emphasize counseling techniques and family dynamics, with options to complete your studies quickly.

Those seeking a broader foundation can choose from online psychology masters that explore human behavior and research skills, often with a focus on affordability. Looking to step into leadership or education administration roles? Consider online edd programs designed for busy professionals ready to earn a doctorate efficiently.

Whether you want to work in counseling, research, education, or leadership, these flexible online degrees can help you achieve your career goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Schulz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles