World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7208 6721 322 310 86 8666

Gert-Jan de Bruijn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gert-Jan de Bruijn between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gert-Jan de Bruijn published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2022. 23 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2022. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
2004 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gert-Jan de Bruijn: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 2
2008 1
2009 6
2010 3
2011 5
2012 10
2013 4
2014 6
2015 6
2016 7
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 4
2021 6
2022 15
2023 5
2024 14
2025 9
Total 117
Download as CSV

Gert-Jan de Bruijn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert-Jan de Bruijn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gert-Jan de Bruijn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert-Jan de Bruijn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gert-Jan de Bruijn is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Health Professions, and Psychology, with notable contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main research topics covered by de Bruijn include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Physical Activity and Health, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Misinformation and Its Impacts, and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Nutrition Journal, JMIR Formative Research, and BMC Medicine.

The following are recent papers authored or co-authored by de Bruijn, including publication year and venues:

  • Barriers and facilitators influencing medication-related CDSS acceptance according to clinicians: A systematic review (2021, International Journal of Medical Informatics)
  • Effectiveness and acceptability of conversational agents for sexual health promotion: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022, Sexual Health)
  • Reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with a low socioeconomic position: protocol of the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial (2020, Nutrition Journal)
  • The Empowering Role of Web-Based Help Seeking on Depressive Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Buffering against exposure to mental health misinformation in online communities on Facebook: the interplay of depression literacy and expert moderation (2023, BMC Public Health)

De Bruijn collaborates frequently with several co-authors who appear multiple times alongside them in publications. These include Michel Klein, Anne L. Vos, Catherine Bolman, Josine M. Stuber, and Jeroen Lakerveld.

Best Publications

  • Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index

    Benjamin Gardner;Charles Abraham;Phillippa Lally;Gert Jan de Bruijn

  • How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Gert-Jan de Bruijn

  • Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view.

    Stef P J Kremers;Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Tommy L S Visscher;Willem van Mechelen

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours

    Benjamin Gardner;Gert Jan De Bruijn;Phillippa Lally

  • Environmental determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: a systematic review.

    Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis;Katrina M. Giskes;Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Wanda Wendel-Vos

  • The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research

    Jonathan van’t Riet;Siet J. Sijtsema;Hans Dagevos;Gert-Jan De Bruijn

  • Adult active transportation: adding habit strength to the theory of planned behavior.

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Stef P. J. Kremers;Anneliese Singh;Bas van den Putte

  • Understanding college students’ fruit consumption. Integrating habit strength in the theory of planned behaviour

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn

  • Does habit strength moderate the intention–behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption

    Gert-Jan De Bruijn;Stef P. J. Kremers;EmEly De Vet;Jascha De Nooijer

  • Interpersonal Communication as an Indirect Pathway for the Effect of Antismoking Media Content on Smoking Cessation

    Bas Van Den Putte;Marco Yzer;Brian G. Southwell;Gert Jan De Bruijn

  • Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Stef P J Kremers;Herman Schaalma;Willem van Mechelen

  • What predicts intention-behavior discordance? A review of the action control framework.

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Gert-Jan de Bruijn

  • Habit in the Physical Activity Domain: Integration With Intention Temporal Stability and Action Control

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Deborah H. Matheson

  • Habit, identity, and repetitive action: A prospective study of binge-drinking in UK students

    Benjamin Gardner;Gert Jan De Bruijn;Phillippa Lally

  • Associations of social-environmental and individual-level factors with adolescent soft drink consumption: Results from the SMILE study

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Stef P. J. Kremers;Hein de Vries;Willem van Mechelen

  • The effects of smoking self-identity and quitting self-identity on attempts to quit smoking.

    Bas van den Putte;Marco Yzer;Marc C. Willemsen;Gert Jan de Bruijn

  • Clustering of energy balance-related behaviours and their intrapersonal determinants

    Stef P. J. Kremers;Gert-Jan De Bruijn;Herman Schaalma;Johannes Brug

  • Saturated fat consumption and the Theory of Planned Behaviour: exploring additive and interactive effects of habit strength.

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Willemieke Kroeze;Anke Oenema;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug

  • Barriers and facilitators influencing medication-related CDSS acceptance according to clinicians: A systematic review.

    Leonie Westerbeek;Kimberley J. Ploegmakers;Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Annemiek J. Linn

  • Modeling individual and physical environmental factors with adolescent physical activity

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Stef P.J. Kremers;Gerty Lensvelt-Mulders;Hein de Vries

  • Active commuting and habit strength: an interactive and discriminant analyses approach

    Gert Jan De Bruijn;Benjamin Gardner

  • Is personality related to fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity in adolescents

    Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Stef P. J. Kremers;Willem van Mechelen;Johannes Brug

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Benjamin Gardner
Benjamin Gardner University of Surrey
Stef P. J. Kremers
Stef P. J. Kremers Maastricht University
Willem van Mechelen
Willem van Mechelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mark Conner
Mark Conner University of Leeds
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Jeroen Lakerveld
Jeroen Lakerveld University of Amsterdam
Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens flexible and affordable opportunities for students, especially those balancing work, life, and education. Many institutions across the USA offer fully online or hybrid programs, making it easier to advance your education from anywhere.

Cost remains a key concern for many aspiring psychologists. Thankfully, there are a variety of programs focused on value and affordability. For example, the most affordable psychology degree programs in Pennsylvania provide accessible options for students in the Northeast. Those in California can research affordable psychology degrees in San Diego for options on the West Coast.

Students seeking the cheapest psychology programs in Tampa or looking for the cheapest psychology degrees in Tuscaloosa will also find dedicated lists of reputable, low-cost programs in those regions.

A degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career pathways, from counseling and social work to research, human resources, and more. Online study options and affordable programs make pursuing these careers more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Gert-Jan de Bruijn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles