World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1576 1412 61 58 168 12755

Anke Oenema publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anke Oenema between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anke Oenema published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 14 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anke Oenema: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 6
2007 6
2008 15
2009 13
2010 13
2011 13
2012 15
2013 9
2014 11
2015 20
2016 12
2017 7
2018 1
2019 5
2020 8
2021 2
2022 7
2023 2
2024 5
2025 9
Total 192
Download as CSV

Anke Oenema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anke Oenema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 168
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Anke Oenema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anke Oenema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Anke Oenema is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology and medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields including clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, social psychology, and physiology.

Oenema's research addresses a range of topics, with notable focus areas including behavioral health and interventions, nutritional studies and diet, obesity, physical activity and diet, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, mindfulness and compassion interventions, eating disorders and behaviors, and motivation and self-concept in sports.

Frequent publication venues for Oenema's research contributions include:

  • European Journal of Nutrition
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • BMC Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Oenema's recent published papers highlight a variety of research questions and methodologies. These include:

  • "Adherence to the Mediterranean diet among adults in Mediterranean countries: a systematic literature review", 2022, European Journal of Nutrition
  • "How stress-related factors affect mental wellbeing of university students: A cross-sectional study to explore the associations between stressors, perceived stress, and mental wellbeing", 2022, PLoS ONE
  • "Measuring Engagement with Mental Health and Behavior Change Interventions: an Integrative Review of Methods and Instruments", 2022, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • "The association of hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance with incident depressive symptoms over 4 years of follow-up: The Maastricht Study", 2020, Diabetologia
  • "The effects of a web-based computer-tailored diet and physical activity intervention based on self-determination theory and motivational interviewing: A randomized controlled trial", 2022, Internet Interventions

Oenema frequently collaborates with a consistent group of co-authors whose names appear multiple times in their research outputs. These co-authors include Juul M. J. Coumans, Catherine Bolman, Lilian Lechner, Hein de Vries, and Cécile Obeid.

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of environmental correlates of obesity-related dietary behaviors in youth

    Klazine van der Horst;A Oenema;I Ferreira;W Wendel-Vos

  • SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands

    Johannes Brug;Arja R. Aro;Anke Oenema;Onno de Zwart

  • Theory, evidence and Intervention Mapping to improve behavior nutrition and physical activity interventions.

    Johannes Brug;Anke Oenema;Isabel Ferreira

  • Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review

    W. Brouwer;W. Kroeze;R. Crutzen;J.M. de Nooijer

  • Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education

    Johannes Brug;Anke Oenema;Marci Campbell

  • Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial

    A. Oenema;J. Brug;L. Lechner

  • A Qualitative Exploration of Reasons for Poor Hand Hygiene Among Hospital Workers: Lack of Positive Role Models and of Convincing Evidence That Hand Hygiene Prevents Cross-Infection

    V. Erasmus;W. Brouwer;E. F. van Beeck;A. Oenema

  • Perceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescents

    Klazine van der Horst;Stef Kremers;Isabel Ferreira;Amika Singh

  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update.

    Karen Broekhuizen;Willemieke Kroeze;Mireille N M van Poppel;Anke Oenema

  • Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews.

    Valery Lemmens;Anke Oenema;Inge Klepp Knut;Johannes Brug

  • A systematic review of the evidence regarding efficacy of obesity prevention interventions among adults

    V. E. P. P. Lemmens;A. Oenema;K. I. Klepp;H. B. Henriksen

  • A short dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents

    Patricia Van Assema;Johannes Brug;Gaby Ronda;Ingrid Steenhuis

  • Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: main effects and mediators.

    Anke Oenema;Frans Tan;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug

  • Efficacy and Use of an Internet-delivered Computer-tailored Lifestyle Intervention, Targeting Saturated Fat Intake, Physical Activity and Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Anke Oenema;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug;Arie Dijkstra;Inge de Weerdt

  • Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory: a cluster analysis approach

    Stijn Ah Friederichs;Catherine Bolman;Anke Oenema;Lilian Lechner

  • Strategies to Facilitate Exposure to Internet-Delivered Health Behavior Change Interventions Aimed at Adolescents or Young Adults: A Systematic Review

    R. Crutzen;J.M. de Nooijer;W. Brouwer;A. Oenema

  • The school food environment associations with adolescent soft drink and snack consumption

    Klazine van der Horst;Anna Timperio;David Crawford;Rebecca Roberts

  • Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public

    Wendy Brouwer;Anke Oenema;Hein Raat;Rik Crutzen

  • Associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting.

    Gerda Rodenburg;Stef P J Kremers;Anke Oenema;Dike van de Mheen

  • Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents

    Richard G Prins;Anke Oenema;Klazine van der Horst;Klazine van der Horst;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug

  • Evaluation of the Web-based computer-tailored FATaintPHAT intervention to promote energy balance among adolescents: results from a school cluster randomized trial.

    Nicole P. M. Ezendam;Johannes Brug;Anke Oenema

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Lilian Lechner
Lilian Lechner The Open University
Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Rik Crutzen
Rik Crutzen Maastricht University
Catherine Bolman
Catherine Bolman The Open University
Hein Raat
Hein Raat Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dike van de Mheen
Dike van de Mheen Maastricht University
Math J. J. M. Candel
Math J. J. M. Candel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stef P. J. Kremers
Stef P. J. Kremers Maastricht University
Nanne K. de Vries
Nanne K. de Vries Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to various online degree programs and professional careers in psychology, social work, and counseling. Flexible online options make these fields accessible while still preparing students for licensure and practical roles.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. If you're looking for budget-friendly study options, consider exploring the cheapest online psychology degree programs. These programs offer an excellent start for those interested in understanding human behavior or pursuing careers in counseling and therapy.

For students seeking to make a direct impact in communities, a msw degree (Master of Social Work) can be achieved online with options designed for accessibility and flexibility. Similarly, those wishing to advance in clinical psychology may look at the best online psych d programs, preparing graduates for therapy, research, and academic careers.

Interested in marriage and family therapy? Accelerated and convenient options like the lmft programs help students gain credentials faster, equipping them for specialized family counseling roles. Online degrees in these fields provide academic flexibility and diverse career pathways for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Anke Oenema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles