World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4974 4613 205 193 165 8450

Dike van de Mheen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dike van de Mheen between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dike van de Mheen published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 12 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1993 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dike van de Mheen: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 4
2006 7
2007 2
2008 8
2009 5
2010 8
2011 6
2012 8
2013 7
2014 15
2015 10
2016 10
2017 18
2018 9
2019 4
2020 11
2021 13
2022 10
2023 11
2024 5
2025 7
Total 190
Download as CSV

Dike van de Mheen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dike van de Mheen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 165
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Dike van de Mheen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dike van de Mheen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Dike van de Mheen is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily within health professions, psychology, and medicine. The main focus areas include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, homelessness and social issues, mental health and patient involvement, mental health treatment and access, workplace health and well-being, health policy implementation science, and alcohol consumption and health effects.

Their scholarly output covers both broad and specific topics in health and psychology with emphasis on clinical and social aspects. The following are the key topics explored in their work:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects

The subfields of study represented in their research include general health professions, clinical psychology, epidemiology, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. This multidisciplinary approach supports their investigations across various dimensions of health and social sciences.

Key publication venues where van de Mheen's work has appeared include:

  • Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • BMJ Open
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen

Their recent scholarly papers encompass studies addressing diverse health and social topics, including addiction recovery, health concepts, and large-scale meta-analyses. Selected recent works are:

  • "Sleep characteristics across the lifespan in 1.1 million people from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "Concepts of health in different contexts: a scoping review" (2022, BMC Health Services Research)
  • "Comparing three stages of addiction recovery: long-term recovery and its relation to housing problems, crime, occupation situation, and substance use" (2020, Drugs Education Prevention and Policy)
  • "The Strengths and Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS): Relationships Matter in Building Strengths and Overcoming Barriers" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Are members of mutual aid groups better equipped for addiction recovery? European cross-sectional study into recovery capital, social networks, and commitment to sobriety" (2020, Drugs Education Prevention and Policy)

Van de Mheen has collaborated frequently with researchers including Andrea D. Rozema, Rob Bovens, Thomas F. Martinelli, Jaap van Weeghel, and Evelien Brouwers. These cooperative engagements reflect recurring partnerships in study development and publication.

Best Publications

  • Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers.

    Antonius J. Van Rooij;Tim M. Schoenmakers;Ad A. Vermulst;Regina J.J.M. Van Den Eijnden

  • Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors

    Daria J Kuss;Antonius J van Rooij;Gillian W Shorter;Mark D Griffiths

  • Sleep characteristics across the lifespan in 1.1 million people from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Desana Kocevska;Thom S Lysen;Aafje Dotinga;M Elisabeth Koopman-Verhoeff

  • The (co-)occurrence of problematic video gaming, substance use, and psychosocial problems in adolescents

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths;Gillian W. Shorter

  • Compulsive Internet use: the role of online gaming and other internet applications.

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Tim M. Schoenmakers;Regina J.J.M. van de Eijnden;Dike van de Mheen

  • How economic crises affect alcohol consumption and alcohol-related health problems: A realist systematic review

    Moniek C. M. de Goeij;Marc Suhrcke;Veronica Toffolutti;Dike van de Mheen

  • Educational differences in excessive alcohol consumption: The role of psychosocial and material stressors

    M. Droomers;C. T. M. Schrijvers;K. Stronks;D. Van De Mheen

  • Video gaming in a hyperconnected world: A cross-sectional study of heavy gaming, problematic gaming symptoms, and online socializing in adolescents

    Michelle Colder Carras;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Dike Van de Mheen;Dike Van de Mheen;Rashelle Musci

  • Maternal educational level and children’s healthy eating behaviour: role of the home food environment (cross-sectional results from the INPACT study)

    Wilke J. C. van Ansem;Carola T. M. Schrijvers;Gerda Rodenburg;Dike van de Mheen;Dike van de Mheen

  • Illicit drug use and injuries: A review of emergency room studies.

    Salvatore Vitale;Dike van de Mheen

  • Video game addiction test: validity and psychometric characteristics.

    Antonius J van Rooij;Tim M Schoenmakers;Regina J J M van den Eijnden;Ad A Vermulst

  • Associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting.

    Gerda Rodenburg;Stef P J Kremers;Anke Oenema;Dike van de Mheen

  • Non-response bias in a sample survey on alcohol consumption

    Viviënne M. H. C. J. Lahaut;Harrie A. M. Jansen;Dike van de Mheen;Henk F. L. Garretsen

  • Smoking and the compression of morbidity

    Wilma Nusselder;Caspar Looman;P.J. Marang-van de Mheen;Dike van de Mheen

  • Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption : Comparison of response waves

    Viviënne M. H. C. J. Lahaut;Harrie A. M. Jansen;Dike van de Mheen;Henk F. L. Garretsen

  • Time to abandon Internet Addiction? Predicting problematic internet, game, and social media use from psychosocial well-being and application use

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Dike van de Mheen;Tim M. Schoenmakers

  • Clinical validation of the C-VAT 2.0 assessment tool for gaming disorder: A sensitivity analysis of the proposed DSM-5 criteria and the clinical characteristics of young patients with ‘video game addiction’

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Antonius J. van Rooij;Tim M. Schoenmakers;Dike van de Mheen

  • Association Between Substance Use and the Perpetration of Family Violence in Industrialized Countries A Systematic Review

    Vandhana Choenni;Alice Hammink;Dike van de Mheen;Dike van de Mheen

  • The Bidirectional Relationships Between Online Victimization and Psychosocial Problems in Adolescents: A Comparison with Real-Life Victimization

    Regina van den Eijnden;Ad Vermulst;Antonius J. van Rooij;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Validation of Cancer Prevalence Data from a Postal Survey by Comparison with Cancer Registry Records

    C. T. M. Schrijvers;K. Stronks;D. H. Van De Mheen;J.-W. W. Coebergh

  • Clinical validation of the C-VAT 2.0 assessment tool for gaming disorder: A sensitivity analysis of the proposed DSM-5 criteria and the clinical characteristics of young patients with 'video game addiction

    Tony van Rooij;Tim. M Schoenmakers;Dike Van de Mheen

Frequent Co-Authors

Stef P. J. Kremers
Stef P. J. Kremers Maastricht University
Anke Oenema
Anke Oenema Maastricht University
Ad A. Vermulst
Ad A. Vermulst Radboud University
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Marloes Kleinjan
Marloes Kleinjan Utrecht University
Ronald A. Knibbe
Ronald A. Knibbe Maastricht University
Daria J. Kuss
Daria J. Kuss Nottingham Trent University
Ron H. J. Scholte
Ron H. J. Scholte Radboud University
Frans F. H. Rutten
Frans F. H. Rutten University Medical Center Utrecht

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers and advanced online degree programs. For those interested in psychology and therapy, there are several flexible study options that suit different goals and schedules.

Many students aiming for a clinical psychology career consider psyd online programs. These programs offer rigorous doctoral-level training for those committed to becoming licensed psychologists, often with the convenience of remote learning. For those passionate about marriage and family therapy, mft online programs provide a specialized path to licensure and practical experience, with some programs designed for rapid completion.

If affordability and flexibility are priorities, masters in psychology online options make advanced study accessible from anywhere. Professionals in education or administration might consider accelerated edd programs online, offering fast-track paths to leadership roles.

Each of these online degrees broadens potential career pathways, enabling students to balance professional goals and personal commitments while gaining skills that are in high demand across social services, education, and mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Dike van de Mheen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles