World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
7906
World Ranking
6403
National Ranking
3088

Gal Zauberman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gal Zauberman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gal Zauberman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gal Zauberman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gal Zauberman is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, general decision sciences, and health. Their work encompasses various aspects of psychological well-being, decision-making, behavioral economics, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes, as well as health disparities, neural and behavioral psychology studies, behavioral health interventions, and environmental education and sustainability.

Recent published papers by Gal Zauberman include:

  • A neural signature of the vividness of prospective thought is modulated by temporal proximity during intertemporal decision making, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Passing the buck to the wealthier: Reference-dependent standards of generosity, 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Harder Than You Think: Misconceptions about Logging Food with Photos versus Text, 2022, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
  • Capturing life or missing it: How mindful photo-taking can affect experiences, 2022, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Inconsistent allocations of harms versus benefits may exacerbate environmental inequality, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Gal Zauberman's research include Kristin Diehl, Alixandra Barasch, Bouke Klein Teeselink, Sangil Lee, and Trishala Parthasarathi. Collaboration with these co-authors has contributed to the diverse topics addressed in Zauberman's field of study.

Gal Zauberman's research is often published in venues such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

The areas of study that characterize Gal Zauberman's work reflect a broad intersection of psychological science and decision-making processes. The focus on cognitive and social psychological mechanisms alongside experimental methods supports research into how individuals perceive, decide, and behave in contexts ranging from personal health to environmental and economic decisions.

Best Publications

  • Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences.

    Gal Zauberman;B. Kyu Kim;Selin A . Malkoc;James R . Bettman

  • Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money.

    Gal Zauberman;John G. Lynch

  • Good Parameters and Implementations for Combined Multiple Recursive Random Number Generators

    Gregory W. Fischer;Ziv Carmon;Dan Ariely;Gal Zauberman

  • The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-In

    Gal Zauberman

  • The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones?

    Dilip Soman;George Ainslie;Shane Frederick;Xiuping Li

  • Memories as Assets: Strategic Memory Protection in Choice over Time

    Gal Zauberman;Rebecca K. Ratner;B. Kyu Kim

  • Perception of anticipatory time in temporal discounting.

    B. Kyu Kim;Gal Zauberman

  • Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect

    Gregory W. Fischer;Ziv Carmon;Dan Ariely;Gal Zauberman

  • On the making of an experience: the effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation

    Dan Ariely;Gal Zauberman

  • Mental Simulation and Preference Consistency over Time: The Role of Process- versus Outcome-Focused Thoughts:

    Min Zhao;Steve Hoeffler;Gal Zauberman

  • How taking photos increases enjoyment of experiences.

    Kristin Diehl;Gal Zauberman;Alixandra Barasch

  • Deferring versus Expediting Consumption: The Effect of Outcome Concreteness on Sensitivity to Time Horizon:

    Selin A . Malkoc;Gal Zauberman

  • When Do You Want It? Time, Decisions, and Public Policy

    John G. Lynch;Gal Zauberman

  • Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences

    Selin A. Malkoc;Gal Zauberman;James R. Bettman

  • Mental Simulation and Product Evaluation: The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Process versus Outcome Simulation:

    Min Zhao;Steve hoeffler;Gal ZauberMan

  • The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges.

    Dan Ariely;Wing Tung Au;Randall H. Bender;David V. Budescu

  • How the Intention to Share Can Undermine Enjoyment: Photo-Taking Goals and Evaluation of Experiences

    Alixandra Barasch;Gal Zauberman;Kristin Diehl

  • Consuming Now or Later? The Interactive Effect of Timing and Attribute Alignability

    Selin A. Malkoc;Gal Zauberman;Canan Ulu

  • The Psychology of Intertemporal Preferences

    Oleg Urminsky;Gal Zauberman

  • Differential partitioning of extended experiences

    Dan Ariely;Dan Ariely;Gal Zauberman;Gal Zauberman

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Ariely
Dan Ariely Duke University
John G. Lynch
John G. Lynch University of Colorado Boulder
James R. Bettman
James R. Bettman Duke University
Barbara E. Kahn
Barbara E. Kahn University of Pennsylvania
Brian T. Ratchford
Brian T. Ratchford The University of Texas at Dallas
Alessandro Acquisti
Alessandro Acquisti Carnegie Mellon University
David Bell
David Bell University of Leeds
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Deborah A. Small
Deborah A. Small University of Pennsylvania
Thomas S. Wallsten
Thomas S. Wallsten University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has transformed how students pursue Social Sciences and Humanities careers. For those interested in helping professions, options like 1 year msw programs online offer a fast-track to becoming a licensed social worker. These accelerated programs balance affordability, flexibility, and academic rigor to fit busy schedules.

If psychology is your passion, you can start your journey with a 2 year psychology degree online. These programs are especially suited for those seeking to pivot careers or quickly qualify for graduate-level studies.

For aspiring counselors, a cacrep online masters in counseling ensures you meet strict professional standards required for licensure. Students also value program affordability and the flexibility to balance studies with work or personal commitments.

Another popular pathway is family therapy. Enrolling in online marriage and family therapy programs allows you to develop specialized skills for supporting individuals and families, all in a fully online format.

As the demand for mental health, counseling, and social services grows, these online degrees open doors to rewarding and impactful career opportunities throughout the USA and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Gal Zauberman

Trending Scientists