World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
10054
World Ranking
4831
National Ranking
235

Adelita V. Ranchor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adelita V. Ranchor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 252 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adelita V. Ranchor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adelita V. Ranchor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adelita V. Ranchor is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in oncology, public health, environmental and occupational health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, clinical psychology, and genetics.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis (2023, Cancer)
  • Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Practical Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Patients, Pharmacists and Physicians to the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Screening in Dutch Outpatient Hospital Care-An Explorative Pilot Study (2020, Journal of Personalized Medicine)
  • Psychosocial factors and cancer incidence (PSY-CA): Protocol for individual participant data meta-analyses (2021, Brain and Behavior)
  • Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancy (2021, Prenatal Diagnosis)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephan J. L. Bakker (17 publications)
  • Daan Kremer (15 publications)
  • Tim J. Knobbe (13 publications)
  • Robert A. Pol (13 publications)
  • Coby Annema (13 publications)

Ranchor's work has been published often in several venues where they have multiple papers, including:

  • Psycho-Oncology (3 papers)
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (2 papers)
  • Mindfulness (2 papers)
  • Scientific Reports (2 papers)
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2 papers)

The main research fields they engage with are medicine in general, with subfields focusing on oncology, public health, pediatrics, psychology, and genetics.

The principal research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Cancer survivorship and care (16 papers)
  • Dialysis and renal disease management (10 papers)
  • Renal transplantation outcomes and treatments (10 papers)
  • Childhood cancer survivors' quality of life (10 papers)
  • Palliative care and end-of-life issues (8 papers)
  • COVID-19 and mental health (8 papers)
  • Family support in illness (8 papers)

Best Publications

  • Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study.

    Vincent E. Hagens;Adelita V. Ranchor;Eric Van Sonderen;Hans A. Bosker

  • A Reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale's Total Score: Self-Compassion versus Self-Criticism

    Angélica López;Robbert Sanderman;Ans Smink;Ying Zhang

  • Type of social support matters for prediction of posttraumatic growth among cancer survivors

    Maya J. Schroevers;Vicki S. Helgeson;Robbert Sanderman;Adelita V. Ranchor

  • Identification and prediction of distress trajectories in the first year after a breast cancer diagnosis.

    Inge Henselmans;Vicki S. Helgeson;Howard Seltman;Jakob de Vries

  • The evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: Depressed and Positive Affect in cancer patients and healthy reference subjects

    Maya J. Schroevers;Robbert Sanderman;Eric van Sonderen;Adelita V. Ranchor

  • Compassion for Others and Self-Compassion: Levels, Correlates, and Relationship with Psychological Well-being.

    Angélica López;Robbert Sanderman;Robbert Sanderman;Adelita V. Ranchor;Maya J. Schroevers

  • The impact of low vision on activities of daily living, symptoms of depression, feelings of anxiety and social support in community-living older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services

    Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen;Judith Ballemans;Adelita V. Ranchor;Ger H. M. B. van Rens

  • The relative contribution of domains of quality of life to overall quality of life for different chronic diseases

    R. R. Arnold;Adelita Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman;G.I.J.M. Kempen

  • Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Mortality in Patients With COPD

    Jacob N. de Voogd;Johan B. Wempe;Gerard H. Koëter;Klaas Postema

  • The role of social support and self-esteem in the presence and course of depressive symptoms: a comparison of cancer patients and individuals from the general population.

    Maya J. Schroevers;Adelita V. Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman

  • Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the posttraumatic growth inventory among cancer patients.

    Tessa A. Jaarsma;Grieteke Pool;Robbert Sanderman;Adelita V. Ranchor

  • Adjustment to cancer in the 8 years following diagnosis: a longitudinal study comparing cancer survivors with healthy individuals.

    Maya Schroevers;Adelita V. Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman

  • Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction or Congestive Heart Failure: A Prospective Study

    Cornelia H. M. Van Jaarsveld;Robbert Sanderman;Ida Miedema;Adelita V. Ranchor

  • Psychological functioning in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

    Heidi E Stiegelis;Adelita V Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman

  • The relationship between self-efficacy and self-reported physical functioning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure.

    Rosemarie Arnold;Adelita V Ranchor;Mike J L DeJongste;Gerard H Köeter

  • The effect of rate control on quality of life in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: data from the RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation II) study.

    Hessel F. Groenveld;Harry J.G.M. Crijns;Maarten P. Van den Berg;Eric Van Sonderen

  • The stability of lifestyle behaviour

    M Mulder;Adelita Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman;J Bouma

  • The concept and measurement of meaning in life in Dutch cancer patients

    Tessa A. Jaarsma;Grieteke Pool;Adelita V. Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman

  • Does marriage protect older people from distress? The role of equity and recency of bereavement

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Nico W. Van Yperen;James C. Coyne;Cornelia H. M. van Jaarsveld

  • The impact of an informational self-management intervention on the association between control and illness uncertainty before and psychological distress after radiotherapy.

    Heidi E. Stiegelis;Mariët Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Femke T.C. Bennenbroek

Frequent Co-Authors

Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen
Maya J. Schroevers
Maya J. Schroevers University Medical Center Groningen
Mariët Hagedoorn
Mariët Hagedoorn University Medical Center Groningen
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen Maastricht University
Johan Ormel
Johan Ormel University Medical Center Groningen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen University Medical Center Groningen
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen
Bert Garssen
Bert Garssen University of Groningen
Corné A. M. Roelen
Corné A. M. Roelen Amsterdam UMC
Isabelle C. Van Gelder
Isabelle C. Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding, in-demand careers. Many students explore online programs focused on applied behavior analysis, counseling, or therapy, which can lead to licensure or certification in specialized fields.

Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is one such credential that’s widely respected. Each region has its own standards, such as the bcba certification requirements in Washington DC, tailored to local regulations and practice settings. Requirements can vary considerably—even across cities. For example, those interested in working in Kansas can review the Wichita bcba requirements for specific information, while students considering North Carolina can consult resources on how to become a bcba in Winston Salem.

Another popular path is counseling. Many psychology graduates pursue roles as mental health counselors. Understanding local qualifications is essential, such as the mental health counselor requirements in Albuquerque. Online degrees offer the flexibility to prepare for these diverse requirements, making it easier to start a career almost anywhere in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Adelita V. Ranchor

Trending Scientists