World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7489 6983 333 321 209 8538

Mariët Hagedoorn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mariët Hagedoorn between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mariët Hagedoorn published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 13 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1995 2025

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mariët Hagedoorn: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 6
2003 8
2004 5
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 12
2009 5
2010 6
2011 7
2012 6
2013 9
2014 11
2015 15
2016 17
2017 23
2018 13
2019 8
2020 10
2021 19
2022 14
2023 16
2024 9
2025 4
Total 248
Download as CSV

Mariët Hagedoorn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariët Hagedoorn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 209
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mariët Hagedoorn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariët Hagedoorn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mariët Hagedoorn is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans across multiple disciplines, with a primary focus on medicine, social sciences, and psychology. Key subfields include sociology and political science, general health professions, clinical psychology, oncology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their work extensively covers topics related to family support in illness, cancer survivorship and care, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, attachment and relationship dynamics, workplace health and well-being, and family caregiving in mental illness.

Several recent publications authored or co-authored by Mariët Hagedoorn illustrate the scope of their research interests:

  • Beating cancer-related fatigue with the Untire mobile app: Results from a waiting-list randomized controlled trial (2020), published in Psycho-Oncology
  • A systems biology approach to understand gut microbiota and host metabolism in morbid obesity: design of the BARIA Longitudinal Cohort Study (2020), published in Journal of Internal Medicine
  • Web-based self-help intervention for partners of cancer patients based on acceptance and commitment therapy and self-compassion training: a randomized controlled trial with automated versus personal feedback (2021), published in Supportive Care in Cancer
  • The relationship between quality of life and coping strategies of children with EB and their parents (2021), published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
  • Beyond "being open about it": A systematic review on cancer related communication within couples (2022), published in Clinical Psychology Review

Mariët Hagedoorn frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Robbert Sanderman (21 publications)
  • Anne Looijmans (17 publications)
  • Marrit A. Tuinman (11 publications)
  • Giulia Ferraris (10 publications)
  • Giovanni Lamura (10 publications)

Their research is often published in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Psychology and Health, Disability and Rehabilitation, and Psycho-Oncology, demonstrating a broad engagement with interdisciplinary health and psychological research communities.

Best Publications

  • Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects

    Mariet Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Hilde N. Bolks;Jolanda Tuinstra

  • Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support

    N.W. Van Yperen;M. Hagedoorn

  • Couples dealing with cancer : Role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Bram P. Buunk;Roeline G. Kuijer;Theo Wobbes

  • Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most?

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Roeline G. Kuijer;Bram P. Buunk;G. Majella DeJong

  • Employees' reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Nico W. Van Yperen;Evert Van De Vliert;Bram P. Buunk

  • Informal Caregiving for Cancer Patients

    Francesca Romito;Gil Goldzweig;Claudia Cormio;Mariët Hagedoorn

  • Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study.

    Nina Rottmann;Dorte Gilså Hansen;Pia Veldt Larsen;Anne Nicolaisen

  • Caregiving in the Illness Context

    Tracey A. Revenson;Konstadina Griva;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Valerie Morrison

  • Injustice and employees' destructive responses: The mediating role of of state negative affect

    van Nico Yperen;Mariet Hagedoorn;Michiel Zweers;Saapke Postma

  • Caregiver burnout among intimate partners of patients with a severe illness: An equity perspective

    Jan F. Ybema;Roeline G. Kuijer;Mariët Hagedoorn;Bram P. Buunk

  • Failing in spousal caregiving: The 'identity-relevant stress' hypothesis to explain sex differences in caregiver distress.

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Bram P. Buunk;Theo Wobbes

  • Facial disfigurement in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of social self-efficacy.

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Eric Molleman

  • Satisfaction with Relationship Status: Development of a New Scale and the Role in Predicting Well-Being

    Vicky Lehmann;Marrit A. Tuinman;Johan Braeken;Ad. J. J. M. Vingerhoets

  • Does marriage protect older people from distress? The role of equity and recency of bereavement

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Nico W. Van Yperen;James C. Coyne;Cornelia H. M. van Jaarsveld

  • The impact of an informational self-management intervention on the association between control and illness uncertainty before and psychological distress after radiotherapy.

    Heidi E. Stiegelis;Mariët Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Femke T.C. Bennenbroek

  • Cognitive adaptation : A comparison of cancer patients and healthy references

    Heidi E. Stiegelis;Mariët Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Karen I. Van der Zee

  • Changes in physical functioning and quality of life in patients with cancer: response shift and relative evaluation of one's condition.

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Kommer C.A Sneeuw;Neil K Aaronson

  • Negative and positive consequences of adolescent cancer 10 years after diagnosis: an interview-based longitudinal study in Sweden

    Vicky Lehmann;Helena Gronqvist;Gunn Engvall;Malin Ander

  • Course of Distress in Breast Cancer Patients, Their Partners, and Matched Control Couples

    Chris Hinnen;Adelita V. Ranchor;Robbert Sanderman;Tom A. B. Snijders

  • Chronic disease in elderly couples - Are women more responsive to their spouses' health condition than men?

    Mariët Hagedoorn;Robbert Sanderman;Adelita V Ranchor;Els I Brilman

Frequent Co-Authors

Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen
Adelita V. Ranchor
Adelita V. Ranchor University Medical Center Groningen
Christoffer Johansen
Christoffer Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Bram P. Buunk
Bram P. Buunk University of Groningen
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen
Tracey A. Revenson
Tracey A. Revenson City University of New York
Konstadina Griva
Konstadina Griva Nanyang Technological University
Aleksandra Luszczynska
Aleksandra Luszczynska University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Ronald P. Stolk
Ronald P. Stolk University Medical Center Groningen
Anita DeLongis
Anita DeLongis University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a range of pathways, especially with the flexibility of online degrees. Students can pursue various specializations such as counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology, all of which have distinct licensing requirements depending on the state where you plan to practice.

For those who aim to become licensed therapists, understanding regional requirements is essential. For example, if you are researching how to become a licensed therapist in Laredo, you'll need to meet specific educational and supervised experience requirements. Similarly, Las Vegas licensed therapist requirements may include different examinations and state certifications.

Other cities have distinct processes as well. If you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Lexington, expect to complete a particular set of coursework and clinical practice hours. Likewise, the journey for becoming a licensed therapist in Lincoln includes its own application steps and professional guidelines.

By choosing an online psychology degree, students can start building the credentials needed for licensure, while also having the flexibility to meet unique state-level requirements. Be sure to check specific criteria for your preferred location as you plan your career path in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mariët Hagedoorn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles