World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
62383
World Ranking
4296
National Ranking
2347

James E. Muller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Muller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 412 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James E. Muller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Muller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Muller is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Political Science and International Relations.

The scientist's work concentrates on key topics related to cardiovascular and diagnostic medicine. These include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Nuclear Issues and Defense
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

James E. Muller's recent papers highlight involvement in studies about vulnerable plaques and patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Notable publications include:

  • "Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study," 2021, published in The Lancet
  • "Vulnerable plaques and patients: state-of-the-art," 2020, published in European Heart Journal
  • "Evolving concepts of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and the vulnerable patient: implications for patient care and future research," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • "Contemporary rationale for non-invasive imaging of adverse coronary plaque features to identify the vulnerable patient: a Position Paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging," 2020, published in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Vulnerable or High-Risk Plaque," 2025, published in JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

The most frequent venues for James E. Muller's publications include:

  • The Lancet
  • European Heart Journal
  • Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Collaboration appears to be a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Gregg W. Stone, Akiko Maehara, Antonius F.W. van der Steen, Patrick W. Serruys, and Amar Dhand. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications, particularly in cardiovascular medicine and imaging.

Best Publications

  • From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

    Morteza Naghavi;Peter Libby;Erling Falk;S. Ward Casscells;S. Ward Casscells

  • Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction

    J. E. Muller;P. H. Stone;Z. G. Turi;J. D. Rutherford

  • Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion. Protection against triggering by regular exertion. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators

    Murray A. Mittleman;Malcolm Maclure;Geoffrey H. Tofler;Jane B. Sherwood

  • Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease.

    J E Muller;G H Tofler;P H Stone

  • Increased Particulate Air Pollution and the Triggering of Myocardial Infarction

    Annette Peters;Douglas W. Dockery;James E. Muller;Murray A. Mittleman

  • Circadian variation in the frequency of sudden cardiac death.

    J E Muller;P L Ludmer;S N Willich;G H Tofler

  • Concurrent morning increase in platelet aggregability and the risk of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death.

    Geoffrey H. Tofler;Damian Brezinski;Andrew I. Schafer;Charles A. Czeisler

  • Triggering of acute myocardial infarction onset by episodes of anger. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators.

    Murray A. Mittleman;Malcolm Maclure;Jane B. Sherwood;Richard P. Mulry

  • In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients

    Ahmed Tawakol;Raymond Q. Migrino;Gregory G. Bashian;Shahinaz Bedri

  • Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial.

    Henry R. Black;William J. Elliott;Gregory Grandits;Patricia Grambsch

  • Circadian variation in the incidence of sudden cardiac death in the Framingham Heart Study population.

    Stefan N. Willich;Daniel Levy;Michael B. Rocco;Geoffrey H. Tofler

  • Triggering Myocardial Infarction by Marijuana

    Murray A. Mittleman;Rebecca A. Lewis;Malcolm Maclure;Jane B. Sherwood

  • Calcium Channel Blocking Agents in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders. Part II: Hemodynamic Effects and Clinical Applications

    Peter H. Stone;Elliott M. Antman;James E. Muller;Eugene Braunwald

  • Risk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: Two-year follow-up☆

    Jhulan Mukharji;Robert E Rude;W.Kenneth Poole;Nancy Gustafson

  • The effect of diabetes mellitus on prognosis and serial left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: Contribution of both coronary disease and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction to the adverse prognosis☆

    Peter H. Stone;Peter H. Stone;James E. Muller;James E. Muller;Tyler Hartwell;Tyler Hartwell;B. J. York;B. J. York

  • Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques

    Johannes A Schaar;James E Muller;Erling Falk;Renu Virmani

  • Meta-analysis of the morning excess of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death.

    Mylan C Cohen;Kati M Rohtla;Kati M Rohtla;Kati M Rohtla;Cynthia E Lavery;Cynthia E Lavery;Cynthia E Lavery;James E Muller;James E Muller;James E Muller

  • Morning increase in onset of ischemic stroke.

    J R Marler;T R Price;G L Clark;J E Muller

  • Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerable plaques: the lexicon of a new frontier

    James E. Muller;George S. Abela;Richard W. Nesto;Geoffrey H. Tofler

  • Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the Princeton Consensus Panel.

    Robert DeBusk;Yaacov Drory;Irwin Goldstein;Graham Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray A. Mittleman
Murray A. Mittleman Harvard University
Geoffrey H. Tofler
Geoffrey H. Tofler Royal North Shore Hospital
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Kenneth J. Mukamal
Kenneth J. Mukamal Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Renu Virmani
Renu Virmani CVPath Institute
Michael L. Dustin
Michael L. Dustin University of Oxford
Emmanouil S. Brilakis
Emmanouil S. Brilakis Abbott Northwestern Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse healthcare degrees and career options. Online programs now offer greater flexibility for students at all stages of their academic journey, from registered nurses to future healthcare managers.

For registered nurses seeking advanced roles, rn to fnp bridge programs provide an accelerated pathway to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. Those looking to expand their clinical knowledge while maintaining a work-life balance may explore online rn-bsn programs without clinicals for added convenience.

Beyond direct patient care, healthcare business leadership is more accessible with top cahme accredited mha programs, preparing graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. If you’re passionate about wellness and prevention, online degrees in nutrition can lead to careers in dietetics, public health, or food science.

These related academic pathways and online degrees are excellent complements to a traditional medicine education, helping meet growing demand for qualified professionals across the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Muller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles