World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24042
World Ranking
16656
National Ranking
185

Jørn Nerup publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jørn Nerup sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 289 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jørn Nerup D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jørn Nerup sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jørn Nerup is affiliated with the Steno Diabetes Center in Denmark. Their recent research has focused on the field of diabetes, particularly type 1 diabetes.

One of Nerup's recently published papers is titled The rise and fall of a paradigm and conceiving a new hypothesis for type 1 diabetes, which appeared in 2025 in the journal Diabetologia.

The publication venues where Nerup has contributed include:

  • Diabetologia

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Åke Lernmark

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes

    Jeffrey C Barrett;David G Clayton;Patrick Concannon;Beena Akolkar

  • A Taql polymorphism in the human interleukin-1β (IL-1β) gene correlates with IL-1β secretion in vitro

    F. Pociot;J. Mølvig;L. Wogensen;H. Worsaae

  • HL-A antigens and diabetes mellitus.

    J Nerup;P Platz;O O Andersen;M Christy

  • Cytotoxicity of human pI 7 interleukin-1 for pancreatic islets of Langerhans.

    Klaus Bendtzen;Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen;Jørn Nerup;Jens H. Nielsen

  • Association of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and class II major histocompatibility complex alleles with the secretion of TNF-a and TNF-0 by human mononuclear cells: a possible link to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Flemming Pociot;Laurence Briant;Cornelis Jongeneel;Jens Mölvig

  • RELATION BETWEEN BREAST-FEEDING AND INCIDENCE RATES OF INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS: A Hypothesis

    K. Borch-Johnsen;T. Mandrup-Poulsen;B. Zachau-Christiansen;Geir Joner

  • Affinity-purified human Interleukin I is cytotoxic to isolated islets of Langerhans

    T. Mandrup-Poulsen;K. Bendtzen;J. Nerup;C. A. Dinarello

  • Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes: What's Next?

    Flemming Pociot;Beena Akolkar;Patrick Concannon;Henry A. Erlich

  • Type 1 Diabetes: Evidence for Susceptibility Loci from Four Genome-Wide Linkage Scans in 1,435 Multiplex Families

    Patrick Concannon;Henry A. Erlich;Cecile Julier;Grant Morahan

  • HLA-D and -DR antigens in genetic analysis of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

    P. Platz;B. K. Jakobsen;N. Morling;L. P. Ryder

  • MLC typing in juvenile diabetes mellitus and idiopathic Addison's disease.

    M. Thomsen;P. Platz;O. Ortved Andersen;M. Christy

  • On the pathogenesis of IDDM

    J. Nerup;T. Mandrap-Poulsen;S. Helqvist;H. U. Andersen

  • Mechanisms of pancreatic beta-cell destruction in type I diabetes

    J Nerup;T Mandrup-Poulsen;J Mølvig;S Helqvist

  • Diabetes mellitus in cystic fibrosis: effect of insulin therapy on lung function and infections

    S Lanng;B Thorsteinsson;J Nerup;C Koch

  • Rapid changes in chromatographically determined haemoglobin A1c induced by short-term changes in glucose concentration.

    P. Aa. Svendsen;J. S. Christiansen;U. Søegaard;B. S. Welinder

  • Declining Incidence of Persistent Proteinuria in Type I (Insulin-Dependent) Diabetic Patients in Denmark

    A Kofoed-Enevoldsen;K Borch-Johnsen;S Kreiner;J Nerup

  • Cytokine and free radicals as effector molecules in the destruction of pancreatic beta cells.

    Mandrup-Poulsen T;Helqvist S;Wogensen Ld;Mølvig J

  • A tumour necrosis factor beta gene polymorphism in relation to monokine secretion and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

    F Pociot;J. Mølvig;L. Wogensen;H. Worsaae

  • Insulin VNTR allele-specific effect in type 1 diabetes depends on identity of untransmitted paternal allele

    Simon T. Bennett;Amanda J. Wilson;Laura Esposito;Nourdine Bouzekri

  • IDDM2-VNTR-encoded susceptibility to type 1 diabetes: dominant protection and parental transmission of alleles of the insulin gene-linked minisatellite locus.

    Simon T. Bennett;Amanda J. Wilson;Francesco Cucca;Jørn Nerup

Frequent Co-Authors

Flemming Pociot
Flemming Pociot Steno Diabetes Center
Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen
Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen University of Copenhagen
Åke Lernmark
Åke Lernmark Lund University
John A. Todd
John A. Todd University of Oxford
Charles A. Dinarello
Charles A. Dinarello University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Erik Thorsby
Erik Thorsby Oslo University Hospital
Anne Cambon-Thomsen
Anne Cambon-Thomsen French National Centre for Scientific Research
Francesco Cucca
Francesco Cucca University of Sassari
Klaus Bendtzen
Klaus Bendtzen Rigshospitalet
Kjersti S. Rønningen
Kjersti S. Rønningen Oslo University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA has become more accessible than ever, thanks to a variety of online programs and flexible learning options. Many students are choosing alternate pathways that lead directly into health-related fields without the traditional barriers or time commitments of medical school.

For those interested in administrative or support roles, consider looking into financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, which can help make education more affordable while providing a fast route to employment.

Nursing candidates can also benefit from options like nursing school that don't require teas, eliminating common entry barriers and smoothing the path to becoming a healthcare professional.

Ambitious students who wish to move quickly into leadership roles may opt for an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, designed to advance your career efficiently.

For current nurses aiming to further their clinical expertise, adn to fnp programs provide a bridge from an associate degree to nurse practitioner, opening doors to advanced practice and specialty roles.

These diverse pathways offer flexible and cost-effective solutions for launching or advancing a medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Jørn Nerup

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles