World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4719 4371 2619 2370 165 16672

Youngmee Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Youngmee Kim between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Youngmee Kim published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 18 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
1991 2025

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Youngmee Kim: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 5
2004 2
2005 6
2006 9
2007 9
2008 7
2009 4
2010 8
2011 5
2012 11
2013 14
2014 7
2015 13
2016 12
2017 13
2018 13
2019 20
2020 7
2021 13
2022 6
2023 13
2024 7
2025 11
Total 224
Download as CSV

Youngmee Kim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Youngmee Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 165
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Youngmee Kim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Youngmee Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Youngmee Kim is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and focuses research efforts primarily in the field of Materials Science. Their work spans several specialized subfields including Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The research topics frequently addressed by Youngmee Kim include:

  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Crystallography and Molecular Interactions
  • Nanoplatforms for Cancer Theranostics
  • Covalent Organic Framework Applications
  • Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection

Notable recent publications by Youngmee Kim include:

  • "Novel Metal-Organic Framework-Based Photocrosslinked Hydrogel System for Efficient Antibacterial Applications," 2020, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • "Highly Efficient Aggregation-Induced Red-Emissive Organic Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Materials with Prolonged Fluorescence Lifetime for Time-Resolved Luminescence Bioimaging," 2020, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • "Visible-Light Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide by Ni(II) Complexes with N4S2 Coordination: Highly Efficient and Selective Production of Formate," 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Robust Copper Metal-Organic Framework-Embedded Polysiloxanes for Biomedical Applications: Its Antibacterial Effects on MRSA and In Vitro Cytotoxicity," 2021, Nanomaterials
  • "Optical and Fluorescent Dual Sensing of Aminoalcohols by in Situ Generation of BODIPY-like Chromophore," 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society

Youngmee Kim has published extensively in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • RSC Advances
  • Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
  • Transplantation
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Their collaborative network includes recurrent co-authors such as Sung-Jin Kim, Juyoung Yoon, Seong Huh, Do Nam Lee, and So-Hyeon Yang, highlighting a broad engagement with fellow researchers across related disciplines.

Recognition of Youngmee Kim's professional contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2019.

Best Publications

  • What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Andrew J. Elliot;Youngmee Kim;Tim Kasser

  • Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being.

    Valery Chirkov;Richard M. Ryan;Youngmee Kim;Ulas Kaplan

  • The Structure of Goal Contents Across 15 Cultures.

    Frederick M. E. Grouzet;Tim Kasser;Aaron Ahuvia;José Miguel Fernández Dols

  • A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Avoidance (Relative to Approach) Personal Goals

    Andrew J. Elliot;Valary I. Chirkov;Youngmee Kim;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness.

    Youngmee Kim;RN Barbara A. Given PhD

  • Family Caregivers' Strains: Comparative Analysis of Cancer Caregiving With Dementia, Diabetes, and Frail Elderly Caregiving

    Youngmee Kim;Richard Schulz

  • Self-Concordance and Subjective Well-Being in Four Cultures:

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Andrew J. Elliot;Richard M. Ryan;Valery Chirkov

  • On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures

    Richard M. Ryan;Jennifer G. La Guardia;Jessica Solky-Butzel;Valery Chirkov

  • Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience.

    Youngmee Kim;Richard Schulz;Charles S. Carver

  • Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors

    K. Robin Yabroff;Youngmee Kim;Youngmee Kim

  • Spirituality moderates the effect of stress on emotional and physical adjustment

    Youngmee Kim;Larry Seidlitz

  • Cancer Caregivers' Quality of Life: Effects of Gender, Relationship, and Appraisal

    Youngmee Kim;Frank Baker;Rachel L. Spillers

  • Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers

    Youngmee Kim;Deborah A. Kashy;David K. Wellisch;Rachel L. Spillers

  • Self-concept, aspirations, and well-being in South Korea and the United States.

    Youngmee Kim;Tim Kasser;Hoonkoo Lee

  • Psychological adjustment of cancer caregivers with multiple roles.

    Youngmee Kim;Frank Baker;Rachel L. Spillers;David K. Wellisch

  • Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: three cohorts comparison

    Youngmee Kim;Deborah A. Kashy;Rachel L. Spillers;Tekla V. Evans

  • The End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ): testing the psychometric properties in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis.

    Youngmee Kim;Lorraine S Evangelista;Linda R Phillips;Carol Pavlish

  • Levels of depressive symptoms in spouses of people with lung cancer: effects of personality, social support, and caregiving burden.

    Youngmee Kim;Youngmee Kim;Paul R. Duberstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Silvia Sörensen;Mark R. Larson;Mark R. Larson

  • Regulation of neutrophil interleukin 8 gene expression and protein secretion by LPS, TNF-α, and IL-1β

    Seitaro Fujishima;Andrew R. Hoffman;Andrew R. Hoffman;Thanh Vu;Thanh Vu;K. Jin Kim

  • Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism Interacts With Childhood Adversity to Predict Aspects of Impulsivity

    Charles S. Carver;Sheri L. Johnson;Jutta Joormann;Youngmee Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles S. Carver
Charles S. Carver University of Miami
David K. Wellisch
David K. Wellisch University of California, Los Angeles
Joel D. Kopple
Joel D. Kopple University of California, Los Angeles
Csaba P. Kovesdy
Csaba P. Kovesdy University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine
Kennon M. Sheldon
Kennon M. Sheldon University of Missouri
Tim Kasser
Tim Kasser Knox College
Deborah A. Kashy
Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology offers a variety of options for online study and professional growth. Choosing an online program can open doors to flexible learning, lower tuition, and a broader selection of specializations. It’s especially important to weigh the cost, reputation, and outcomes of each program before enrolling.

For those seeking budget-friendly choices, there are several affordable psychology degrees in University Park as well as comprehensive affordable psychology programs in Utah, both known for their cost efficiency and academic standards. If studying in New England appeals to you, the cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont offer excellent value, making higher education more accessible.

Additionally, location can play a key role. For those interested in a thriving, urban academic scene, the popular psychology programs in Charlotte provide a dynamic blend of online and campus opportunities.

Completing an online psychology degree can lead to diverse career pathways, from counseling and research to human resources and education. By exploring these programs, you can find the path that fits your budget and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Youngmee Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles