World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1761 1581 131 122 201 14002

Julie Leask publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie Leask between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie Leask published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2025. 55 of the 268 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2025. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 32 publications
1998 2025

268 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie Leask: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 0
2008 6
2009 6
2010 9
2011 9
2012 7
2013 13
2014 5
2015 8
2016 6
2017 23
2018 14
2019 13
2020 19
2021 30
2022 20
2023 6
2024 23
2025 32
Total 268
Download as CSV

Julie Leask publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Leask sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 201 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 201
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie Leask D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Leask sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Julie Leask is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on medicine and social sciences. Their work spans various subfields including health, epidemiology, sociology and political science, general health professions, and infectious diseases.

Their main research topics cover:

  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research

Leask has published in a variety of academic venues, most notably:

  • Vaccine
  • Vaccines
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Medical Journal of Australia
  • UNC Libraries

Selected recent papers include:

  • Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19, 2021, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • COVID-19 is rapidly changing: Examining public perceptions and behaviors in response to this evolving pandemic, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Examining Australian public perceptions and behaviors towards a future COVID-19 vaccine, 2021, BMC Infectious Diseases

Leask has worked collaboratively with several frequent coauthors, such as:

  • Margie Danchin
  • Jessica Kaufman
  • Kerrie Wiley
  • Holly Seale
  • Maria Christou-Ergos

Their contributions also include book publications, notably:

  • The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation, 2021, published by Swiss School of Archaeology in Greece

Best Publications

  • Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action:

    Noel T. Brewer;Gretchen B. Chapman;Alexander J. Rothman;Julie Leask

  • Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals

    Julie Leask;Paul Kinnersley;Cath Jackson;Francine Cheater

  • Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19

    Bernadette Hyland-Wood;John Gardner;Julie Leask;Ullrich K.H. Ecker

  • Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions.

    Cornelia Betsch;Noel T. Brewer;Pauline Brocard;Patrick Davies

  • Antivaccination activists on the world wide web

    P Davies;S Chapman;J Leask

  • Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination

    Jessica Kaufman;Rebecca Ryan;Louisa Walsh;Dell Horey

  • Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition.

    Katrine Bach Habersaat;Cornelia Betsch;Margie Danchin;Cass R. Sunstein

  • Vaccine hesitancy, refusal and access barriers: The need for clarity in terminology.

    Helen Bedford;Katie Attwell;Margie Danchin;Helen Marshall

  • Associations Between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions About Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study

    Adam G Dunn;Julie Leask;Xujuan Zhou;Kenneth D Mandl

  • COVID-19 is rapidly changing: Examining public perceptions and behaviors in response to this evolving pandemic.

    Holly Seale;Anita E. Heywood;Julie Leask;Meru Sheel

  • Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States.

    Adam G. Dunn;Didi Surian;Julie Leask;Aditi Dey

  • Media coverage of health issues and how to work more effectively with journalists: a qualitative study.

    Julie Leask;Claire Hooker;Catherine King

  • Barriers to access to health care for newly resettled sub-Saharan refugees in Australia.

    Mohamud Sheikh-Mohammed;C Raina Macintyre;Nicholas J Wood;Julie Leask

  • Target the fence-sitters

    Julie Leask

  • The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in United Kingdom 1998-2005: inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication?

    David C. Burgess;Margaret A. Burgess;Margaret A. Burgess;Julie Leask;Julie Leask

  • Uptake of influenza vaccine by pregnant women: a cross-sectional survey

    Kerrie E Wiley;Peter D Massey;Spring C Cooper;Nicholas J Wood

  • Mandate vaccination with care.

    Saad B. Omer;Cornelia Betsch;Julie Leask

  • COVID-19 misinformation trends in Australia: Prospective longitudinal national survey

    Kristen Pickles;Erin Cvejic;Brooke Nickel;Tessa Copp

  • “Do-it-yourself”: Vaccine rejection and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)

    Katie Attwell;Paul Russell Ward;Samantha B Meyer;Philippa Rokkas

  • What maintains parental support for vaccination when challenged by anti-vaccination messages? A qualitative study.

    Julie Leask;Julie Leask;Simon Chapman;Penelope Hawe;Margaret Burgess

  • "Will they just pack up and leave?" - attitudes and intended behaviour of hospital health care workers during an influenza pandemic.

    Holly Seale;Julie Leask;Kieren Po;C Raina MacIntyre;C Raina MacIntyre

  • Parental attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and concerns towards childhood vaccinations in Australia: A national online survey.

    Maria Yui Kwan Chow;Margie Danchin;Harold W Willaby;Sonya Pemberton

  • Face‐to‐face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Booy
Robert Booy University of Sydney
Peter McIntyre
Peter McIntyre University of Otago
Lyndal Trevena
Lyndal Trevena University of Sydney
Simon Chapman
Simon Chapman University of Sydney
Paul Ward
Paul Ward Torrens University Australia
David Isaacs
David Isaacs Children's Hospital at Westmead
Cornelia Betsch
Cornelia Betsch Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
Kirsten McCaffery
Kirsten McCaffery University of Sydney
Julia M.L. Brotherton
Julia M.L. Brotherton University of Melbourne
Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens various online study options that can fit different budgets and schedules. Many students are choosing online master's programs for specialized knowledge and to increase career opportunities in just a year. These programs help graduates move quickly into leadership or advanced roles in their field.

For those wishing to complete their education faster, accelerated bachelor degree programs offer a way to earn a degree in a shorter time, saving money and entering the workforce sooner.

Affordability is a key concern, notably in fields like social work. Students can find quality education at a lower price through some of the cheapest online msw programs, which prepare you for meaningful careers in communities and organizations.

Additionally, those interested in behavior analysis may consider an accelerated bcba program online. These routes offer flexibility for working professionals and can lead to high-demand certifications.

With online options expanding, prospective students have more choices than ever to launch or advance careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Leask

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles