World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
10790
World Ranking
4173
National Ranking
1456

David S. Pilliod publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Pilliod sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 167 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David S. Pilliod D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Pilliod sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David S. Pilliod is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial body of work in ecology and related subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of environmental processes, particularly in the areas of rangeland and wildlife management, fire effects on ecosystems, and ecology and vegetation dynamics. Other notable research topics include wildlife ecology and conservation, species distribution and climate change, amphibian and reptile biology, and the use of environmental DNA in biodiversity studies.

Key recent publications by David S. Pilliod include:

  • "Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity" (2022, Science)
  • "Small-scale water deficits after wildfires create long-lasting ecological impacts" (2020, Environmental Research Letters)
  • "A National-Scale Assessment of Mercury Bioaccumulation in United States National Parks Using Dragonfly Larvae As Biosentinels through a Citizen-Science Framework" (2020, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • "Bridging the research-management gap: landscape science in practice on public lands in the western United States" (2020, Landscape Ecology)
  • "Protecting restoration investments from the cheatgrass-fire cycle in sagebrush steppe" (2021, Conservation Science and Practice)

Pilliod frequently publishes in several scientific journals. The most common venues include Landscape Ecology, Rangeland Ecology & Management, Environmental Science & Technology, Conservation Science and Practice, and Restoration Ecology.

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Arkle, Michelle I. Jeffries, Matthew J. Germino, Cameron L. Aldridge, and Justin L. Welty.

Best Publications

  • Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species

    Caren S. Goldberg;Cameron R. Turner;Kristy Deiner;Katy E. Klymus

  • Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples

    David S. Pilliod;Caren S. Goldberg;Robert S. Arkle;Lisette P. Waits

  • Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders.

    Caren S. Goldberg;David S. Pilliod;Robert S. Arkle;Lisette P. Waits

  • Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian

    David S. Pilliod;Caren S. Goldberg;Robert S. Arkle;Lisette P. Waits

  • Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape

    W. Chris Funk;Michael S. Blouin;Paul Stephen Corn;Bryce A. Maxell

  • Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis

    Matthew B. Laramie;Matthew B. Laramie;David S. Pilliod;Caren S. Goldberg

  • Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms

    Caren S. Goldberg;Katherine M. Strickler;David S. Pilliod

  • Quantitative evidence for the effects of multiple drivers on continental-scale amphibian declines

    Evan H. Campbell Grant;David A. W. Miller;Benedikt R. Schmidt;Michael J. Adams

  • Fire and amphibians in North America

    David S. Pilliod;R.Bruce Bury;Erin J. Hyde;Christopher A. Pearl

  • Long-term effects of seeding after wildfire on vegetation in Great Basin shrubland ecosystems

    Kevin C. Knutson;David A. Pyke;Troy A. Wirth;Robert S. Arkle

  • Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations.

    Melanie A Murphy;R Dezzani;D S Pilliod;A Storfer

  • Refining the cheatgrass–fire cycle in the Great Basin: Precipitation timing and fine fuel composition predict wildfire trends

    David S. Pilliod;Justin L. Welty;Robert S. Arkle

  • Local and Landscape Effects of Introduced Trout on Amphibians in Historically Fishless Watersheds

    David S. Pilliod;Charles R. Peterson

  • Seasonal migration of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) among complementary resources in a high mountain basin

    David S Pilliod;Charles R Peterson;Peter I Ritson

  • Effects of amphibian chytrid fungus on individual survival probability in wild boreal toads.

    David S. Pilliod;Erin Muths;Rick D. Scherer;Rick D. Scherer;Paul E. Bartelt

  • Seventy-Five Years of Vegetation Treatments on Public Rangelands in the Great Basin of North America

    David S. Pilliod;Justin L. Welty;Gordon R. Toevs

  • Assessing the Consequences of Nonnative Trout in Headwater Ecosystems in Western North America

    Jason B. Dunham;David S. Pilliod;Michael K. Young

  • Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities

    David A. W. Miller;Evan H. Campbell Grant;Erin Muths;Staci M. Amburgey

  • Compensatory effects of recruitment and survival when amphibian populations are perturbed by disease

    Erin Muths;Rick D. Scherer;Rick D. Scherer;David S. Pilliod

  • Quantifying restoration effectiveness using multi-scale habitat models: implications for sage-grouse in the Great Basin.

    Robert S. Arkle;David S. Pilliod;Steven E. Hanser;Matthew L. Brooks

  • Distribution and environmental limitations of an amphibian pathogen in the Rocky Mountains, USA

    Erin Muths;David S. Pilliod;Lauren J. Livo

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J. Germino
Matthew J. Germino United States Geological Survey
Erin Muths
Erin Muths United States Geological Survey
Nancy F. Glenn
Nancy F. Glenn Boise State University
Caren S. Goldberg
Caren S. Goldberg Washington State University
Paul Stephen Corn
Paul Stephen Corn United States Geological Survey
David A. Pyke
David A. Pyke United States Geological Survey
Lisette P. Waits
Lisette P. Waits University of Idaho
Matthew L. Brooks
Matthew L. Brooks United States Geological Survey
Jason B. Dunham
Jason B. Dunham United States Geological Survey
Janet L. Rachlow
Janet L. Rachlow University of Idaho

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution, many complementary fields offer online study options to broaden your expertise. For example, an online mathematics degree can provide invaluable analytical skills, supporting advanced research or data-driven roles in environmental science.

Visual storytelling is growing in demand for ecological outreach and education. Learning design through online graphic design schools can help you contribute to educational materials, outreach campaigns, or nonprofit initiatives.

Some students prefer a flexible, customized approach. The most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs allow you to blend biology, policy, technology, or communication—tailoring your education to specific environmental career goals.

For those fascinated by how human history interacts with ecology, pursuing an online masters in history can deepen your understanding of environmental change and its social impacts.

Whichever pathway you choose, these online degrees make it easier to build skill sets that are highly valued in the field of Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing David S. Pilliod

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles