World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
11793
World Ranking
3894
National Ranking
2183

Jake Harwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake Harwood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jake Harwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake Harwood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jake Harwood is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and works primarily in the fields of social sciences and psychology. Their research focuses on areas including sociology and political science, social psychology, communication, gender studies, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's main topics of study cover social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, social media and politics, communication in education and healthcare, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, international student and expatriate challenges, and gender diversity and inequality.

Harwood has published in several academic venues, frequently contributing to the International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, Communication Monographs, and Media Psychology.

Recent papers by Harwood include:

  • Social Identity Theory (2020) in The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
  • Modes of intergroup contact: If and how to interact with the outgroup (2021) in Journal of Social Issues

Frequent collaborators with Harwood are:

  • Hyeonchang Gim (9 coauthored works)
  • Стефаниа Паолини (4 coauthored works)
  • Heather Gahler (4 coauthored works)
  • Tiana Case (3 coauthored works)
  • Mark Rubin (2 coauthored works)

Best Publications

  • The Contact Caveat Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Stefania Paolini;Anne Pedersen;Matthew J. Hornsey

  • Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures

    Stefania Paolini;Jake Harwood;Mark Rubin

  • The genesis of vitality theory: historical patterns and discoursal dimensions

    Jake Harwood;Howard Giles;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • A Social Cognitive Theory Approach to the Effects of Mediated Intergroup Contact on Intergroup Attitudes

    Michelle Ortiz;Jake Harwood

  • Rapid assessment of well-being: The Short Depression-Happiness Scale (SDHS).

    Stephen Joseph;P. Alex Linley;Jake Harwood;Christopher Alan Lewis

  • Age Identification, Social Identity Gratifications, and Television Viewing.

    Jake Harwood

  • Grandparent-Grandchild Contact and Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Moderator and Mediator Effects

    Jake Harwood;Miles Hewstone;Stefania Paolini;Alberto Voci

  • Intergroup Contact and Grandparent-Grandchild Communication: The Effects of Self-Disclosure on Implicit and Explicit Biases Against Older People

    Tania Tam;Tania Tam;Miles Hewstone;Jake Harwood;Alberto Voci

  • Improving Intergroup Attitudes through Televised Vicarious Intergroup Contact Social Cognitive Processing of Ingroup and Outgroup Information

    Nick Joyce;Jake Harwood

  • The Contact Space: A Novel Framework for Intergroup Contact Research

    Jake Harwood

  • Viewing age: Lifespan identity and television viewing choices

    Jake Harwood

  • Communicative Predictors of Solidarity in the Grandparent-Grandchild Relationship

    Jake Harwood

  • Shared Family Identity, Age Salience, and Intergroup Contact: Investigation of the Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship

    Jordan Soliz;Jake Harwood

  • Aging, communication, and intergroup theory: Social identity and intergenerational communication.

    Jake Harwood;Howard Giles;Ellen B. Ryan

  • Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient

    Jake Harwood;Stefania Paolini;Nick Joyce;Mark Rubin

  • Underrepresented, positively portrayed: Older adults in television commercials

    Abhik Roy;Jake Harwood

  • Intergroup communication : multiple perspectives

    Jake Harwood;Howard Giles

  • Modernization and Tradition in an Age of Globalization: Cultural Values in Chinese Television Commercials

    Yan Bing Zhang;Jake Harwood

  • The Portrayal of Older Adults in Advertising: A Cross-National Review

    Yan Bing Zhang;Jake Harwood;Angie Williams;Virpi Ylänne-McEwen

  • Affiliation, Pride, Exchange, and Distance in Grandparents' Accounts of Relationships with Their College-Aged Grandchildren.

    Jake Harwood;Mei-Chen Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Alberto Voci
Alberto Voci University of Padua
Cindy Gallois
Cindy Gallois University of Queensland
Mary Lee Hummert
Mary Lee Hummert University of Kansas
Ellen Bouchard Ryan
Ellen Bouchard Ryan McMaster University
Chris Segrin
Chris Segrin University of Arizona
Mark Rubin
Mark Rubin Durham University
Nicole Tausch
Nicole Tausch University of St Andrews
Ed Cairns
Ed Cairns University of Ulster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many universities across the country offer flexible programs tailored to different interests, such as counseling, clinical practice, organizational psychology, and research. Choosing the right program is essential for building a strong foundation in the field.

For those researching specific regional strengths, some cities stand out for their quality offerings. For example, you can explore the top psychology programs in Grand Forks, which provide comprehensive training and research opportunities. In Michigan, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Grand Rapids highlights schools known for innovative courses and experienced faculty. Considering a southern education? The top psychology programs in Greenville offer strong undergraduate and graduate options.

Urban centers like Houston stand out as well—the best psychology degree rankings in Houston spotlight institutions with diverse specializations, ideal for students interested in multicultural and urban settings. Whatever your aspirations, these highly ranked programs can set you on the right track for a fulfilling career in psychology or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jake Harwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles