World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
13352
World Ranking
6056
National Ranking
3290

Viorica Marian publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viorica Marian sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Viorica Marian D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viorica Marian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Viorica Marian is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has a research profile centered on psychology and neuroscience. Their academic work includes a significant focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience, contributing broadly to developmental and educational psychology and language and linguistics.

The primary topics covered in their research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Viorica Marian has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • Measuring bilingualism: The quest for a "bilingualism quotient", 2020, Applied Psycholinguistics
  • Cross-Modal Interaction Between Auditory and Visual Input Impacts Memory Retrieval, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience

Their frequent co-authors demonstrate collaboration in areas related to bilingualism, cognition, and language, including:

  • Sayuri Hayakawa
  • Ashley Chung-Fat-Yim
  • Sirada Rochanavibhata
  • James Bartolotti
  • Peiyao Chen

Viorica Marian's work has been published repeatedly in several venues that appear regularly in their research contributions, such as:

  • Brain and Language
  • International Journal of Bilingualism
  • Frontiers in Communication
  • Translational Issues in Psychological Science
  • Language Learning

Their research contributes to understanding complex cognitive processes underlying language acquisition, bilingualism, and sensory integration. The integration of these fields reflects interdisciplinary expertise combining developmental, educational, and cognitive neuroscience perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals.

    Viorica Marian;Henrike K. Blumenfeld;Margarita Kaushanskaya

  • Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition.

    Viorica Marian;Michael Spivey

  • Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon

    Michael J. Spivey;Viorica Marian

  • Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories.

    Viorica Marian;Ulric Neisser

  • CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities.

    Viorica Marian;James Bartolotti;Sarah Chabal;Anthony Shook

  • Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging.

    Viorica Marian;Michael Spivey;Joy Hirsch

  • Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items

    Viorica Marian;Michael Spivey

  • The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.

    Margarita Kaushanskaya;Viorica Marian

  • Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages

    Jennifer Krizman;Viorica Marian;Anthony Shook;Erika Skoe

  • Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking

    Henrike K. Blumenfeld;Viorica Marian

  • Self-Construal and Emotion in Bicultural Bilinguals.

    Viorica Marian;Margarita Kaushanskaya

  • Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension

    Henrike K. Blumenfeld;Viorica Marian

  • Bilingual Two-Way Immersion Programs Benefit Academic Achievement.

    Viorica Marian;Anthony Shook;Scott R. Schroeder

  • The Bilingual Language Interaction Network for Comprehension of Speech.

    Anthony Shook;Viorica Marian

  • Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension.

    Anthony Shook;Viorica Marian

  • Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals

    Henrike K. Blumenfeld;Viorica Marian

  • Bilingualism reduces native-language interference during novel-word learning.

    Margarita Kaushanskaya;Viorica Marian

  • Bilingual Language Processing and Interference in Bilinguals: Evidence From Eye Tracking and Picture Naming

    Margarita Kaushanskaya;Viorica Marian

  • Language Learning and Control in Monolinguals and Bilinguals.

    James Bartolotti;Viorica Marian

  • Language‐dependent memory in bilingual learning

    Viorica Marian;Caitlin M. Fausey

Frequent Co-Authors

Margarita Kaushanskaya
Margarita Kaushanskaya University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael J. Spivey
Michael J. Spivey University of California, Merced
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
Ulric Neisser
Ulric Neisser Cornell University
Arturo E. Hernandez
Arturo E. Hernandez University of Houston
Joy Hirsch
Joy Hirsch Yale University
Philippe Rochat
Philippe Rochat Emory University
Krista Byers-Heinlein
Krista Byers-Heinlein Concordia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of career pathways, both online and in traditional settings. Many students begin with a bachelor's or master's in psychology, which can lead to roles in counseling, social work, or mental health services. For those interested in clinical practice, further training and state licensure are essential.

The process of becoming a licensed therapist varies depending on your location. For instance, requirements for becoming a licensed therapist in Riverside and how to become a licensed therapist in Sacramento may differ in coursework, supervised hours, and examinations. Similarly, guidelines for becoming a licensed therapist in Saint Paul and San Antonio licensed therapist requirements reflect state-specific standards.

Online degree programs can provide flexibility for aspiring psychologists, but it's crucial to ensure the program meets your state’s licensing criteria. Explore related degree options and research licensure pathways early to align your studies with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Viorica Marian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles