World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
34
Citations
4446
World Ranking
2929
National Ranking
1184

David E Speyer publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E Speyer sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 104 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David E Speyer D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E Speyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E Speyer is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Mathematics, spanning a total of 50 publications. Within this broad field, they have contributed significantly to several subfields, including Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Algebra and Number Theory.

Their scholarly work addresses various complex topics, notably Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics, Algebraic structures and combinatorial models, Advanced Algebra and Geometry, Polynomial and algebraic computation, Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory, Commutative Algebra and Its Applications, and Advanced Mathematical Identities.

David E Speyer has published extensively in several academic venues, with the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Selecta Mathematica
  • Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
  • Algebraic Combinatorics
  • Journal of Commutative Algebra

Their recent papers include:

  • Grassmannians for scattering amplitudes in 4d =4 SYM and 3d ABJM, 2022, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Cohomology of cluster varieties, I: Locally acyclic case, 2022, Algebra & Number Theory
  • Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of matrix Schubert varieties, 2024, Selecta Mathematica
  • The positive Dressian equals the positive tropical Grassmannian, 2021, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society Series B
  • Electrical networks and Lagrangian Grassmannians, 2025, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré D Combinatorics Physics and their Interactions

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research practice. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Grant T. Barkley
  • Oliver Pechenik
  • Anna Weigandt
  • Thomas Lam
  • Alex Fink

Best Publications

  • The tropical Grassmannian

    David Speyer;Bernd Sturmfels

  • Tropical Linear Spaces

    David E. Speyer

  • Positroid varieties: juggling and geometry

    Allen Knutson;Thomas Lam;David E. Speyer

  • Tropical Mathematics

    David Speyer;Bernd Sturmfels

  • Computing tropical varieties

    T. Bogart;A. N. Jensen;D. Speyer;B. Sturmfels

  • Perfect matchings and the octahedron recurrence

    David E. Speyer

  • The Tropical Totally Positive Grassmannian

    David Speyer;Lauren Williams

  • Cambrian fans

    Nathan Reading;David E Speyer

  • Weak separation and plabic graphs

    Suho Oh;Alexander Postnikov;David E. Speyer

  • Matching polytopes, toric geometry, and the totally non-negative Grassmannian

    Alexander Postnikov;David Speyer;Lauren Williams

  • Positroid varieties I: juggling and geometry

    Allen Knutson;Thomas Lam;David E Speyer

  • A matroid invariant via the K-theory of the Grassmannian

    David E. Speyer

  • Uniformizing Tropical Curves I: Genus Zero and One

    David E Speyer

  • The Cube Recurrence

    Gabriel D. Carroll;David E Speyer

  • A broken circuit ring

    Nicholas J. Proudfoot;David E. Speyer

  • Computing Tropical Varieties

    T. Bogart;A. N. Jensen;D. Speyer;B. Sturmfels

  • Reconstructing Trees from Subtree Weights

    Lior Pachter;David E Speyer

  • Acyclic Cluster Algebras Revisited

    David Speyer;Hugh Thomas

  • Projections of Richardson varieties

    Allen Knutson;Thomas Lam;David E Speyer

  • MATCHING POLYTOPES, TORIC GEOMETRY, AND THE NON-NEGATIVE PART OF THE GRASSMANNIAN

    Alexander Postnikov;David Speyer;Lauren Williams

  • Weak Separation and Plabic Graphs

    Suho Oh;Alex Postnikov;David E Speyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Lam
Thomas Lam University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lauren Williams
Lauren Williams Harvard University
Bernd Sturmfels
Bernd Sturmfels Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
Lior Pachter
Lior Pachter California Institute of Technology
Robert Kleinberg
Robert Kleinberg Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals complement their analytical skills with business education by exploring the easiest MBA programs to get into. These programs offer practical knowledge in management and leadership while maintaining flexible schedules.

If convenience is a priority, easy online MBA programs provide a convenient way to earn a valuable degree without compromising quality. These programs are designed for working professionals seeking to advance their careers efficiently.

For those aiming at executive roles, pursuing the cheapest AACSB online DBA can be an affordable yet prestigious option. These doctoral programs focus on strategic decision-making and research, elevating expertise in business administration.

Similarly, combining mathematical skills with finance through a master of finance online degree is an excellent way to enter high-demand sectors like investment banking and financial analysis. These affordable online programs offer specialized training that complements mathematical proficiency.

Choosing any of these pathways allows students to tailor their education for a competitive edge in various industries, leveraging flexible, accessible online learning formats.

Best Scientists Citing David E Speyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles