World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas J. Beckman

Thomas J. Beckman

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
20114
World Ranking
3735
National Ranking
1786

Thomas J. Beckman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Beckman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas J. Beckman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Beckman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Beckman is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has made numerous contributions primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Education.

Their work often addresses themes such as Innovations in Medical Education, Diversity and Career in Medicine, ECG Monitoring and Analysis, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, Innovative Teaching Methods, Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout, and Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas J. Beckman are:

  • Autonomy and professional identity formation in residency training: A qualitative study, 2020, Medical Education
  • The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • Fitting In While Standing Out: Professional Identity Formation, Imposter Syndrome, and Burnout in Early-Career Faculty Physicians, 2022, Academic Medicine
  • ECG Interpretation Proficiency of Healthcare Professionals, 2023, Current Problems in Cardiology
  • Reframing professional identity through navigating tensions during residency: A qualitative study, 2022, Perspectives on Medical Education

Thomas J. Beckman frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably including Michael W. Cullen, Anthony H. Kashou, Peter A. Noseworthy, Nandan S. Anavekar, and Kurt B. Angstman.

The scientist has published frequently in the following venues:

  • BMC Medical Education
  • Current Problems in Cardiology
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Circulation
  • CHEST Journal

Best Publications

  • Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

    Bridget C. O’Brien;Ilene B. Harris;Thomas J. Beckman;Darcy A. Reed

  • Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

    David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman

  • Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.

    Darcy A. Reed;David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman;Rachel B. Levine

  • Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manager Should Know

    Jay Liebowitz;Thomas J. Beckman

  • Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review.

    David Allan Cook;Thomas J. Beckman;Georges Bordage

  • Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.

    Darcy A. Reed;Thomas J. Beckman;Scott M. Wright;Rachel B. Levine

  • What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching

    Thomas J. Beckman;David A. Cook;Jayawant N. Mandrekar

  • Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

    David A. Cook;Denise M. Dupras;Thomas J. Beckman;Kris G. Thomas

  • How Reliable Are Assessments of Clinical Teaching?: A Review of the Published Instruments

    Thomas J. Beckman;Amit K. Ghosh;David A. Cook;Patricia J. Erwin

  • Reflections on experimental research in medical education

    David Allan Cook;Thomas J. Beckman

  • Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers

    Thomas J. Beckman;David A. Cook

  • Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: Applying Keller's instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course

    David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman;Kris G. Thomas;Warren G. Thompson

  • Using Social Media to Improve Continuing Medical Education: A Survey of Course Participants

    Amy T. Wang;Nicole P. Sandhu;Christopher M. Wittich;Jayawant N. Mandrekar

  • Behaviors of highly professional resident physicians.

    Darcy A. Reed;Colin P. West;Paul S. Mueller;Robert D. Ficalora

  • E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors

    Christopher M. Wittich;Anoop Agrawal;David A. Cook;Andrew J. Halvorsen

  • Kearns-Sayre syndrome: a case series of 35 adults and children.

    Sherezade Khambatta;Douglas L Nguyen;Thomas J Beckman;Christopher M Wittich

  • Does scale length matter? A comparison of nine- versus five-point rating scales for the mini-CEX.

    David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman

  • Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability

    David A. Cook;Thomas J. Beckman;Jayawant N. Mandrekar;V. Shane Pankratz

  • Flipping the Quality Improvement Classroom in Residency Education.

    Sara L. Bonnes;John T. Ratelle;Andrew J. Halvorsen;Kimberly J. Carter

  • Associations between resident physicians’ publications and clinical performance during residency training

    Luke A. Seaburg;Amy T. Wang;Colin P. West;Darcy A. Reed

  • Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching.

    Thomas J. Beckman;Mark C. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic
Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Anthony R. Artino
Anthony R. Artino George Washington University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Lambert Schuwirth
Lambert Schuwirth Flinders University
Stephen S. Cha
Stephen S. Cha Mayo Clinic
Cathy D. Schleck
Cathy D. Schleck Mayo Clinic
V. Shane Pankratz
V. Shane Pankratz University of New Mexico
Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, exploring online degree options can open up diverse career pathways. Many students are seeking flexible learning solutions, and programs like an msw degree offer a practical route for aspiring social workers to make an impact in communities.

Careers in behavior analysis are also gaining popularity, with bcba programs providing the specialized training needed to support individuals with behavioral challenges. These programs cater to those interested in clinical settings, schools, or private practice.

For students looking to enter the workforce sooner, accelerated social work programs and accelerated bachelor's degree psychology options are designed to fast-track your education. These intensive pathways allow you to gain credentials quickly without sacrificing academic quality.

Online learning is making advanced education in the social sciences more accessible and affordable. Whether your interest lies in social work, behavioral analysis, or psychology, these online degrees can set you on a rewarding professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Beckman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles