World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lambert Schuwirth

Lambert Schuwirth

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 62 1272 1125 93 85 218 14335

Lambert Schuwirth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lambert Schuwirth between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lambert Schuwirth published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2012. 12 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2012. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1986 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lambert Schuwirth: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 4
2002 7
2003 5
2004 8
2005 6
2006 3
2007 10
2008 5
2009 12
2010 14
2011 8
2012 19
2013 15
2014 6
2015 16
2016 9
2017 12
2018 5
2019 14
2020 15
2021 11
2022 5
2023 5
2024 7
2025 5
Total 239
Download as CSV

Lambert Schuwirth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schuwirth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 218 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 218
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lambert Schuwirth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schuwirth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94 62
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Lambert Schuwirth is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on medical education. Their research spans a broad range of topics that include innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiology practices and education, global health workforce issues, medical education and admissions, higher education learning practices, and student assessment and feedback.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • A history of assessment in medical education, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • Workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education: A hermeneutic review, 2020, Medical Education
  • Fairness in human judgement in assessment: a hermeneutic literature review and conceptual framework, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • An international study on the implementation of programmatic assessment: Understanding challenges and exploring solutions, 2022, Medical Teacher

Their collaborative work often involves several frequent co-authors, including Steven J. Durning with whom they have published 12 papers, Nyoli Valentine with 5 collaborative works, Dario Torre with 4, and both E. Michael Shanahan and Julie Ash each with 4 joint publications.

Schuwirth's research is commonly published in several key venues such as Advances in Health Sciences Education with 5 publications, Medical Education with 4, Medical Teacher with 3, Diagnosis with 3, and Perspectives on Medical Education also with 3 works.

The scientific domains covered by their work are predominantly in medicine, with 77 publications. Their subfields focus largely on public health, environmental, and occupational health (37 publications), family practice (19), education (15), radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging (12), and emergency medical services (6).

Best Publications

  • Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning

    Cees P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose

    C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;J. Dijkstra

  • The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development

    C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;F. Scheele;E. W. Driessen

  • Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Outcomes of longitudinal integrated clinical placements for students, clinicians and society

    Lucie Walters;Jennene Greenhill;Janet Richards;Helena Ward

  • Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment

    C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;M. J. B. Govaerts

  • Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.

    Marjan J. B. Govaerts;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten;Arno M. M. Muijtjens

  • The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study.

    E. Driessen;C. van der Vleuten;L. Schuwirth;J.W.F. van Tartwijk

  • The use of clinical simulations in assessment.

    L W T Schuwirth;C P M van der Vleuten

  • The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice

    Sylvia Heeneman;Andrea Oudkerk Pool;Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice

    Steven Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Louis Pangaro;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

  • Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise.

    M. J. B. Govaerts;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten;A. M. M. Muijtjens

  • Visualising the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning

    J. Hommes;B. Rienties;W. de Grave;G. Bos

  • Workplace-based assessment: raters’ performance theories and constructs

    M. J. B. Govaerts;M. W. J. Van de Wiel;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten

  • Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment.

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • The Mechanism of Impact of Summative Assessment on Medical Students' Learning.

    Francois J Cilliers;Hanelie J. Adendorff;Nicoline Herman

  • Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning

    Steven J. Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Lambert Schuwirth;Cees van der Vleuten

  • A Model of the Pre-assessment Learning Effects of Summative Assessment in Medical Education.

    Francois J. Cilliers;Nicoline Herman;Hanelie J. Adendorff

  • A new framework for designing programmes of assessment.

    J. Dijkstra;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Anthony R. Artino
Anthony R. Artino George Washington University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Louis N. Pangaro
Louis N. Pangaro Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Erik W. Driessen
Erik W. Driessen Maastricht University
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John R. Boulet
John R. Boulet Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Social Sciences or Humanities career? There are now more flexible options than ever to help you reach your goals. Many students are choosing online masters programs for advanced study while balancing work or family responsibilities.

If you want to fast-track your education, accelerated degree programs online allow you to complete your bachelor's in less time, saving both money and effort.

Affordability is also a key consideration. Prospective social workers can benefit from the cheapest msw programs, which provide accredited online learning without breaking the bank. These programs open doors to meaningful work in community services, counseling, and advocacy.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, pursuing a bcba degree online is an excellent pathway. These programs lead to roles in education, therapy, and behavioral health.

Online learning isn’t just convenient—it’s a powerful tool to launch or enhance your career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Lambert Schuwirth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles