World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lambert Schuwirth

Lambert Schuwirth

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
62
Citations
14335
World Ranking
1272
National Ranking
93

Lambert Schuwirth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schuwirth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 218 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lambert Schuwirth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schuwirth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lambert Schuwirth is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on medical education. Their research spans a broad range of topics that include innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiology practices and education, global health workforce issues, medical education and admissions, higher education learning practices, and student assessment and feedback.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • A history of assessment in medical education, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • Workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education: A hermeneutic review, 2020, Medical Education
  • Fairness in human judgement in assessment: a hermeneutic literature review and conceptual framework, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • An international study on the implementation of programmatic assessment: Understanding challenges and exploring solutions, 2022, Medical Teacher

Their collaborative work often involves several frequent co-authors, including Steven J. Durning with whom they have published 12 papers, Nyoli Valentine with 5 collaborative works, Dario Torre with 4, and both E. Michael Shanahan and Julie Ash each with 4 joint publications.

Schuwirth's research is commonly published in several key venues such as Advances in Health Sciences Education with 5 publications, Medical Education with 4, Medical Teacher with 3, Diagnosis with 3, and Perspectives on Medical Education also with 3 works.

The scientific domains covered by their work are predominantly in medicine, with 77 publications. Their subfields focus largely on public health, environmental, and occupational health (37 publications), family practice (19), education (15), radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging (12), and emergency medical services (6).

Best Publications

  • Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning

    Cees P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose

    C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;J. Dijkstra

  • The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development

    C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;F. Scheele;E. W. Driessen

  • Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Outcomes of longitudinal integrated clinical placements for students, clinicians and society

    Lucie Walters;Jennene Greenhill;Janet Richards;Helena Ward

  • Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment

    C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;M. J. B. Govaerts

  • Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.

    Marjan J. B. Govaerts;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten;Arno M. M. Muijtjens

  • The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study.

    E. Driessen;C. van der Vleuten;L. Schuwirth;J.W.F. van Tartwijk

  • The use of clinical simulations in assessment.

    L W T Schuwirth;C P M van der Vleuten

  • The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice

    Sylvia Heeneman;Andrea Oudkerk Pool;Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice

    Steven Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Louis Pangaro;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

  • Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise.

    M. J. B. Govaerts;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten;A. M. M. Muijtjens

  • Visualising the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning

    J. Hommes;B. Rienties;W. de Grave;G. Bos

  • Workplace-based assessment: raters’ performance theories and constructs

    M. J. B. Govaerts;M. W. J. Van de Wiel;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten

  • Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment.

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • The Mechanism of Impact of Summative Assessment on Medical Students' Learning.

    Francois J Cilliers;Hanelie J. Adendorff;Nicoline Herman

  • Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.

    Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning

    Steven J. Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Lambert Schuwirth;Cees van der Vleuten

  • A Model of the Pre-assessment Learning Effects of Summative Assessment in Medical Education.

    Francois J. Cilliers;Nicoline Herman;Hanelie J. Adendorff

  • A new framework for designing programmes of assessment.

    J. Dijkstra;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Anthony R. Artino
Anthony R. Artino George Washington University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Louis N. Pangaro
Louis N. Pangaro Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Erik W. Driessen
Erik W. Driessen Maastricht University
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John R. Boulet
John R. Boulet Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Social Sciences or Humanities career? There are now more flexible options than ever to help you reach your goals. Many students are choosing online masters programs for advanced study while balancing work or family responsibilities.

If you want to fast-track your education, accelerated degree programs online allow you to complete your bachelor's in less time, saving both money and effort.

Affordability is also a key consideration. Prospective social workers can benefit from the cheapest msw programs, which provide accredited online learning without breaking the bank. These programs open doors to meaningful work in community services, counseling, and advocacy.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, pursuing a bcba degree online is an excellent pathway. These programs lead to roles in education, therapy, and behavioral health.

Online learning isn’t just convenient—it’s a powerful tool to launch or enhance your career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Lambert Schuwirth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles