D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 33 Citations 5,329 89 World Ranking 3606 National Ranking 247

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Surgery
  • Internal medicine

Competence, Social psychology, Educational measurement, Clinical competence and Management science are his primary areas of study. Lambert Schuwirth has researched Competence in several fields, including Concept learning, Standards-based assessment, Conceptual framework and Practice setting. His work is dedicated to discovering how Standards-based assessment, Competence assessment are connected with Medical education and other disciplines.

Lambert Schuwirth has included themes like Cognitive load, Cognitive psychology, Protocol analysis and Situated cognition in his Social psychology study. In his research on the topic of Educational measurement, Strengths and weaknesses, Standardised patient and Mathematics education is strongly related with Risk analysis. His Clinical competence research integrates issues from Alternative medicine, Clinical clerkship, Students medical and Professional competence.

His most cited work include:

  • A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose (369 citations)
  • The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development (213 citations)
  • Outcomes of longitudinal integrated clinical placements for students, clinicians and society (169 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Lambert Schuwirth mainly investigates Medical education, Clinical reasoning, Competence, Educational measurement and Curriculum. His Medical education research focuses on Meaning and how it connects with Variety and Clinical supervision. His studies deal with areas such as Cognitive load, Cognitive psychology and Objective structured clinical examination as well as Clinical reasoning.

His study focuses on the intersection of Competence and fields such as Clinical competence with connections in the field of Professional competence. His study in Social psychology extends to Educational measurement with its themes. The concepts of his Curriculum study are interwoven with issues in Mathematics education and Test.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Medical education (34.72%)
  • Clinical reasoning (15.28%)
  • Competence (15.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Medical education (34.72%)
  • Judgement (8.33%)
  • Epistemology (3.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Medical education, Judgement, Epistemology, Clinical reasoning and Clinical competence. His Medical education study combines topics in areas such as Problem behaviour and Formative assessment. In his study, Educational measurement is inextricably linked to Learning theory, which falls within the broad field of Formative assessment.

His Judgement research focuses on subjects like Credibility, which are linked to Objectivity. Meaning is closely connected to Categorization in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Clinical reasoning. The various areas that Lambert Schuwirth examines in his Clinical competence study include Education professional, Educational research, Professional competence and Curriculum.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Drawing Boundaries: The Difficulty in Defining Clinical Reasoning. (33 citations)
  • The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations (13 citations)
  • Theoretical considerations on programmatic assessment. (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Epistemology
  • Surgery

His primary areas of study are Competence, Cognition, Perspective, Coding and Cognitive psychology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Concordance, Clinical competence and Family medicine, General practice. His Cognition research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Psychological intervention, Audiology, QT interval, Applied psychology and Meta-analysis.

Perspective is connected with Association, Heart rate variability, Cognitive load, Protocol and Situated cognition in his research. His multidisciplinary approach integrates Cognitive psychology and Certification in his work. Lambert Schuwirth incorporates a variety of subjects into his writings, including Terminology, CLARITY, Vocabulary, Credibility, Narrative and Medical education.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose

C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;J. Dijkstra.
Medical Teacher (2012)

570 Citations

The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development

C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;F. Scheele;E. W. Driessen.
Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (2010)

346 Citations

The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study.

E. Driessen;C. van der Vleuten;L. Schuwirth;J.W.F. van Tartwijk.
Medical Education (2005)

262 Citations

Outcomes of longitudinal integrated clinical placements for students, clinicians and society

Lucie Walters;Jennene Greenhill;Janet Richards;Helena Ward.
Medical Education (2012)

250 Citations

The use of clinical simulations in assessment.

L W T Schuwirth;C P M van der Vleuten.
Medical Education (2003)

243 Citations

Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment

C. P. M. van der Vleuten;L. W. T. Schuwirth;E. W. Driessen;M. J. B. Govaerts.
Medical Teacher (2015)

193 Citations

Workplace-based assessment: raters’ performance theories and constructs

M. J. B. Govaerts;M. W. J. Van de Wiel;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten.
Advances in Health Sciences Education (2013)

185 Citations

Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise.

M. J. B. Govaerts;L. W. T. Schuwirth;C. P. M. Van der Vleuten;A. M. M. Muijtjens.
Advances in Health Sciences Education (2011)

178 Citations

Visualising the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning

J. Hommes;B. Rienties;W. de Grave;G. Bos.
Advances in Health Sciences Education (2012)

172 Citations

Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice

Steven Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Louis Pangaro;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten.
Medical Education (2011)

167 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Lambert Schuwirth

Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

Maastricht University

Publications: 116

Steven J. Durning

Steven J. Durning

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Publications: 63

Eric S. Holmboe

Eric S. Holmboe

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Publications: 31

Erik W. Driessen

Erik W. Driessen

Maastricht University

Publications: 29

Olle ten Cate

Olle ten Cate

Utrecht University

Publications: 29

Karen E. Hauer

Karen E. Hauer

University of California, San Francisco

Publications: 25

Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier

Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier

Maastricht University

Publications: 25

Anthony R. Artino

Anthony R. Artino

George Washington University

Publications: 24

Kevin W. Eva

Kevin W. Eva

University of British Columbia

Publications: 23

Pim W. Teunissen

Pim W. Teunissen

Maastricht University

Publications: 22

Bart Rienties

Bart Rienties

The Open University

Publications: 22

Arno M. M. Muijtjens

Arno M. M. Muijtjens

Maastricht University

Publications: 21

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Maastricht University

Publications: 19

Jonathan Sherbino

Jonathan Sherbino

McMaster University

Publications: 17

C.P.M. van der Vleuten

C.P.M. van der Vleuten

Maastricht University

Publications: 16

Bernard Charlin

Bernard Charlin

University of Montreal

Publications: 16

Trending Scientists

Khalid Zaman

Khalid Zaman

University of Haripur

Clint Dawson

Clint Dawson

The University of Texas at Austin

Stephen J. Finney

Stephen J. Finney

University of Edinburgh

Janine Cossy

Janine Cossy

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Luis Blanco

Luis Blanco

Spanish National Research Council

Judit Villén

Judit Villén

University of Washington

Brendan Mackey

Brendan Mackey

Griffith University

Christer Betsholtz

Christer Betsholtz

Uppsala University

Emanuel E. Strehler

Emanuel E. Strehler

Mayo Clinic

Victor L. Sylvia

Victor L. Sylvia

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Roland C. Warner

Roland C. Warner

University of Tasmania

Peter K. Stys

Peter K. Stys

University of Calgary

Dongtao Wei

Dongtao Wei

Southwest University

Lloyd E. Chambless

Lloyd E. Chambless

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Anne Greenough

Anne Greenough

King's College London

Something went wrong. Please try again later.