World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
4984
World Ranking
6516
National Ranking
3149

Louis N. Pangaro publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis N. Pangaro sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Louis N. Pangaro D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis N. Pangaro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louis N. Pangaro is affiliated with the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with an emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health. Other subfields addressed include family practice, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, general health professions, and physiology.

Their work spans several main topics including innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, medical education and admissions, radiology practices and education, health and medical research impacts, simulation-based education in healthcare, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Frequently published venues for their research include Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Academic Medicine, Medical Science Educator, Journal of Healthcare Leadership, and Military Medicine.

Recent notable papers by Louis N. Pangaro include:

  • Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores, 2020, Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Factors and Interactions Influencing Direct Observation: A Literature Review Guided by Activity Theory, 2021, Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Expectations of and for Clerkship Directors 2.0: A Collaborative Statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education, 2021, Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Physician Leadership and Burnout: The Need for Agency; a Qualitative Study of an Academic Institution, 2024, Journal of Healthcare Leadership
  • Gathering Validity Evidence on an Internal Medicine Clerkship Multistep Exam to Assess Medical Student Analytic Ability, 2020, Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Louis N. Pangaro has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Paul A. Hemmer, Dario Torre, Steven J. Durning, William F. Kelly, and Lauren A. Maggio.

Best Publications

  • A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations.

    L Pangaro

  • How Well Do Internal Medicine Faculty Members Evaluate the Clinical Skills of Residents

    Gordon L. Noel;Jerome E. Herbers;Madlen P. Caplow;Glinda S. Cooper

  • Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide No. 78

    Louis Pangaro;Olle ten Cate

  • Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education.

    Edward P. Finnerty;Sheila Chauvin;Giulia Bonaminio;Mark Andrews

  • Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Mini—Clinical Evaluation Exercise for Internal Medicine Residency Training

    Steven J Durning;Lannie J Cation;Ronald J Markert;Louis N Pangaro

  • Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice

    Steven Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Louis Pangaro;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

  • Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting

    Stephen M Salerno;Patrick G O'Malley;Patrick G O'Malley;Louis N Pangaro;Gary A Wheeler

  • Perspective: redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research and training in medical education.

    Steven J. Durning;Anthony R. Artino;Louis N. Pangaro;Cees van der Vleuten

  • Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship.

    Paul A. Hemmer;Richard Hawkins;Jeffrey L. Jackson;Louis N. Pangaro

  • How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence

    Jerome E. Herbers;Gordon L. Noel;Glinda S. Cooper;Joan Harvey

  • Medical Student Documentation in Electronic Health Records: A Collaborative Statement From the Alliance for Clinical Education

    Maya M. Hammoud;John L. Dalymple;Jennifer G. Christner;Robyn A. Stewart

  • Effect of clinical teaching on student performance during a medicine clerkship.

    Stuart A Roop;Louis Pangaro

  • Opportunities and challenges in integrating electronic health records into undergraduate medical education: a national survey of clerkship directors.

    Maya M. Hammoud;Katherine Margo;Jennifer G. Christner;Jonathan Fisher

  • Electronic health records improve clinical note quality

    Harry B Burke;Laura L Sessums;Albert Hoang;Dorothy A Becher

  • The Structure of Program Evaluation: An Approach for Evaluating a Course, Clerkship, or Components of a Residency or Fellowship Training Program

    Steven J Durning;Paul Hemmer;Louis N Pangaro

  • Expectations of and for clerkship directors: a collaborative statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education.

    Louis Pangaro;Jay Bachicha;Amy Brodkey;Heidi Chumley-Jones

  • America's "undiscovered" laboratory for health services research.

    Ronald W. Gimbel;Louis Pangaro;Galen Barbour

  • The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior.

    Elizabeth P. Berbano;Robert Browning;Louis Pangaro;Jeffrey L. Jackson

  • A controlled trial of a seminar to improve medical student attitudes toward,knowledge about,and use of the medical literature

    Frank J. Landry;Louis Pangaro;Kurt Kroenke;Catherine Lucey

  • QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes.

    Harry B. Burke;Albert Hoang;Dorothy Becher;Paul A. Fontelo

  • An online spaced-education game to teach and assess medical students: a multi-institutional prospective trial.

    B. Price Kerfoot;Harley Baker;Louis Pangaro;Kathryn Agarwal

  • A shared professional framework for anatomy and clinical clerkships.

    Louis N. Pangaro

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Lambert Schuwirth
Lambert Schuwirth Flinders University
Anthony R. Artino
Anthony R. Artino George Washington University
John R. Boulet
John R. Boulet Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David B. Swanson
David B. Swanson National Board of Medical Examiners
Charlotte Ringsted
Charlotte Ringsted Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse online degree and career options. For those interested in mental health or counseling, psyd psychology programs provide advanced training for clinical practice and research, often leading to psychologist roles. If you’re looking for a specialization in couples or family therapy, consider lmft programs. These programs deliver the necessary accreditation and skills for a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Cost is a significant factor for many prospective students. To get a sense of the financial commitment required, learn more about how much does a masters in psychology cost. Affordable and flexible options exist, letting you balance advancement with budget needs. For experienced professionals aiming for leadership roles, accelerated edd degrees offer a fast-track path to earning a doctorate in education and moving into academic or organizational leadership.

Each pathway has unique admission requirements, career outcomes, and timelines. Carefully researching these online programs will help you choose the right path for your goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Louis N. Pangaro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles