World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
8450
World Ranking
3880
National Ranking
1844

David B. Swanson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David B. Swanson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

David B. Swanson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David B. Swanson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

David B. Swanson is affiliated with the National Board of Medical Examiners in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a concentration on several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Education, Health Information Management, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Swanson's work encompasses a range of topics, notably:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology

The scientist has published in several notable venues, including:

  • Annals of Surgery
  • Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
  • Perspectives on Medical Education
  • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Frequent collaborators in their research include Brian C. George, Anna Ryan, Maya M. Hammoud, Lauren Foster, and Monica M. Cuddy, each having coauthored multiple papers with Swanson.

Representative recent publications illustrate the diverse scope of their work:

  • A Proposed Blueprint for Operative Performance Training, Assessment, and Certification, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests, 2020, Perspectives on Medical Education
  • Do Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Scores Predict the Likelihood of Passing the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part I Examination? An Update With 2014 to 2018 Data, 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  • Surgical Trainee Performance and Alignment With Surgical Program Director Expectations, 2021, Annals of Surgery
  • Nanostructuring of Iron Disulfide Cathode Materials for Enhanced Thermal Batteries, 2021, Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Best Publications

  • Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art

    C. P. M. van der Vleuten;David B. Swanson

  • Performance-Based Assessment: Lessons From the Health Professions:

    David B. Swanson;Geoffrey R. Norman;Robert L. Linn

  • Expertise and error in diagnostic reasoning

    Paul E. Johnson;Alica S. Duran;Frank Hassebrock;James H. Moller

  • Assessing Clinical Skills of Residents with Standardized Patients

    Paula L. Stillman;David B. Swanson;Sydney Smee;Alfred E. Stillman

  • Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination.

    D. I. Newble;D. B. Swanson

  • 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment

    John Norcini;M Brownell Anderson;Valdes Bollela;Vanessa Burch

  • Extended‐matching items: A practical alternative to free‐response questions

    Susan M. Case;David B. Swanson

  • The quality of in-house medical school examinations.

    Ralph F Jozefowicz;Bruce M Koeppen;Susan Case;Robert Galbraith

  • ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL SKILLS OF RESIDENTS UTILIZING STANDARDIZED PATIENTS: A FOLLOW-UP STUDY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPLICATION

    Paula Stillman;David Swanson;Mary Beth Regan;Mary M. Philbin

  • Charting the winds of change: evaluating innovative medical curricula.

    Charles P. Friedman;Ruth de Bliek;David S. Greer;Stewart P. Mennin

  • An assessment of the clinical skills of fourth-year students at four New England medical schools.

    Paula L. Stillman;Mary B. Regan;David B. Swanson;Susan Case

  • Assessment of Clinical Competence: Written and Computer-Based Simulations

    David B. Swanson;John J. Norcini;Louis J. Grosso

  • Guidelines for assessing clinical competence

    David Newble;Beth Dawson;Dale Dauphinee;Gordon Page

  • Retention of basic science information by senior medical students.

    Yu Ling;David B. Swanson;Kathy Holtzman;S Deniz Bucak

  • Simulations in the United States Medical Licensing Examination™ (USMLE™)

    G F Dillon;J R Boulet;R E Hawkins;D B Swanson

  • Factors influencing reproducibility of tests using standardized patients

    David B. Swanson;John J. Norcini

  • Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.

    J. J. Norcini;D. B. Swanson;L. J. Grosso;G. D. Webster

  • Resident-patient interactions: The humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses

    James O. Woolliscroft;Joel D. Howell;Bonnie P. Patel;David B. Swanson

  • Ensuring the Clinical Competence of Medical School Graduates Through Standardized Patients

    Paula L. Stillman;David B. Swanson

  • Assessment of Clinical Skills With Standardized Patients: State of the Art Revisited

    David B Swanson;Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Team cohesiveness, team size and team performance in team-based learning teams

    Britta M Thompson;Paul Haidet;Nicole J Borges;Lisa R Carchedi

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Norcini
John J. Norcini Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research
John R. Boulet
John R. Boulet Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research
Geoffrey R. Norman
Geoffrey R. Norman McMaster University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Judy A. Shea
Judy A. Shea University of Pennsylvania
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charlotte Ringsted
Charlotte Ringsted Aarhus University
Louis N. Pangaro
Louis N. Pangaro Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Lambert Schuwirth
Lambert Schuwirth Flinders University
Robert H. Glew
Robert H. Glew University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways. Whether you are looking for affordability, flexibility, or career advancement, there are numerous options available to fit your goals.

If cost is an important factor, you may want to consider the cheapest psychology degree online programs. These options can help you earn a respected degree without taking on significant debt.

For those interested in social work, enrolling in masters in social work online programs can be a practical pathway to making a difference in your community while studying at your own pace.

If you are aiming for advanced clinical practice, consider the benefits of psy d programs online, which are tailored for aspiring psychologists seeking a doctorate with a focus on practical experience.

You may also explore mft programs online for a fast-track to a career in marriage and family therapy.

Each of these online options can help you build the skills and credentials needed for impactful roles in mental health, research, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing David B. Swanson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles