World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
38
Citations
7244
World Ranking
5888
National Ranking
969

David Newble publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Newble sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

David Newble D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Newble sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Newble is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is connected primarily to this institution, where they are engaged in research activities.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues have been recorded in the available data. Likewise, no book publications or defined main fields or subfields of study are listed.

Given the absence of detailed records regarding research topics, publications, or awards, the profile focuses on the verified affiliation with the University of Sheffield, indicating a professional involvement in higher education and research within that university environment.

Best Publications

  • Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education.

    D. I. Newble;N. J. Entwistle

  • The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students.

    D. I. Newble;Kerry Jaeger

  • Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations.

    David Newble

  • The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in an innovative problem‐based medical school

    D. I. Newble;R. M. Clarke

  • Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination.

    D. I. Newble;D. B. Swanson

  • The parallel rural community curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice.

    Paul Worley;Chris Silagy;David Prideaux;David Newble

  • International handbook of research in medical education

    Geoff R. Norman;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten;David I. Newble;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

  • A handbook for teachers in universities & colleges : a guide to improving teaching methods

    David Newble;Robert Cannon

  • Strategic planning in medical education: enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings

    Jill Gordon;Clarke Hazlett;Olle Ten Cate;Karen Mann

  • Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees.

    J. D. Beard;B. C. Jolly;D. I. Newble;W. E. G. Thomas

  • Guidelines for assessing clinical competence

    David Newble;Beth Dawson;Dale Dauphinee;Gordon Page

  • The use of portfolios for assessment of the competence and performance of doctors in practice

    T J Wilkinson;M Challis;S O Hobma;D I Newble

  • A Handbook for Medical Teachers

    David Newble;Robert Cannon

  • Assessing clinical competence at the undergraduate level.

    D. I. Newble

  • A comparison of multiple‐choice tests and free‐response tests in examinations of clinical competence

    D. I. Newble;Avril Baxter;R. G. Elmslie

  • The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations

    D. I. Newble;Jennifer Hoare;P. F. Sheldrake

  • How can we test clinical reasoning

    C P van der Vleuten;D I Newble

  • Portfolio-based assessments in medical education: are they valid and reliable for summative purposes?

    Chris Roberts;David I Newble;Alan J O'Rourke

  • Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians.

    R B Hays;H A Davies;J D Beard;L J M Caldon

  • The learning style of medical students

    D. I. Newble;Margaret I. Gordon

  • A Handbook for Teachers in Universities & Colleges: A Guide To Improving Teaching Methods. Third Edition.

    David Newble;Robert Cannon

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Clark Jolly
Brian Clark Jolly University of Newcastle Australia
Chris Roberts
Chris Roberts University of Sydney
Tim J Wilkinson
Tim J Wilkinson University of Otago
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Noel Entwistle
Noel Entwistle University of Edinburgh
Amanda Howe
Amanda Howe University of East Anglia
Karen Mann
Karen Mann Dalhousie University
David B. Swanson
David B. Swanson National Board of Medical Examiners
Chris Frampton
Chris Frampton University of Otago
Lambert Schuwirth
Lambert Schuwirth Flinders University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offer unmatched flexibility and access for students around the world. From counseling to leadership roles, a range of career pathways is available, and choosing the right program is crucial.

For those interested in advanced clinical psychology, consider the psy d programs available online. These programs focus on real-world practice and qualify graduates for top licensure opportunities.

If you’re seeking a faster academic route, look into accelerated online mft programs. These condensed courses prepare students for careers as marriage and family therapists, helping you start making a difference sooner.

Cost is often a concern. Many students prioritize online psychology masters that balance course quality with affordability, making a graduate education accessible without overwhelming debt.

For those aspiring to leadership and academic positions, the shortest edd program online can provide a quick pathway to senior roles in education and administration.

Best Scientists Citing David Newble

Recently Published Articles