World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
14573
World Ranking
1115
National Ranking
517

John J. Norcini publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Norcini sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 234 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John J. Norcini D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Norcini sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Norcini is affiliated with the Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and health professions, with a focus on innovations in medical education and global health workforce issues.

The scientist's primary fields of study include Medicine and Health Professions. Subfields of investigation cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Emergency Medical Services; General Health Professions; Family Practice; and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Key topics in John J. Norcini's work include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Healthcare Quality and Management

The following recent papers illustrate their contributions and range of collaborative work:

  • International Medical Graduates: Promoting Equity and Belonging, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Entrustment decisions: Implications for curriculum development and assessment, 2020, Medical Teacher
  • Quality assurance in health professions education: Role of accreditation and licensure, 2022, Medical Education
  • The Associations Between United States Medical Licensing Examination Performance and Outcomes of Patient Care, 2023, Academic Medicine
  • Excess Mortality Among US Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2023, JAMA Internal Medicine

John J. Norcini has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Medical Teacher
  • Academic Medicine
  • Medical Education
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • The Asia Pacific Scholar

Throughout their career, Norcini has collaborated often with several coauthors. These include Ara Tekian, Sonoo Thadaney Israni, Nathan Douthit, Keren Mazuz, and Michael Alkan.

Best Publications

  • Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31

    John Norcini;Vanessa Burch

  • The Mini-CEX: A Method for Assessing Clinical Skills

    John J Norcini;Linda L Blank;F Daniel Duffy;Gregory S Fortna

  • Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

    John Norcini;Brownell Anderson;Valdes Bollela;Vanessa Burch

  • The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance.

    Rethans Jj;Norcini Jj;Barón-Maldonado M;Blackmore D

  • Assessment methods in medical education

    John J. Norcini;Danette W. McKinley

  • Implementation of competency-based medical education: are we addressing the concerns and challenges?

    Richard E Hawkins;Catherine M Welcher;Eric S Holmboe;Lynne M Kirk

  • Setting standards on educational tests

    John J Norcini

  • Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool

    John J Norcini;Vanessa C. Burch;Trevor Gibbs

  • Peer assessment of competence.

    John J Norcini

  • Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists.

    Paul G. Ramsey;Jan D. Carline;Thomas S. Inui;Eric B. Larson

  • 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment

    John Norcini;M Brownell Anderson;Valdes Bollela;Vanessa Burch

  • A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges

    Linda Snell;Susan Tallett;Steven Haist;Richard Hays

  • Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice

    Robyn Tamblyn;Michael Abrahamowicz;Carlos Brailovsky;Paul Grand'Maison

  • Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work.

    John J Norcini

  • Clinical teaching: maintaining an educational role for doctors in the new health care environment.

    D. Prideaux;Heather Alexander;A. Bower;J. Dacre

  • Evaluating The Quality Of Care Provided By Graduates Of International Medical Schools

    John J. Norcini;John R. Boulet;W. Dale Dauphinee;Amy Opalek

  • The Credibility and Comparability of Standards

    John J. Norcini;Judy A. Shea

  • Assessment of Clinical Competence: Written and Computer-Based Simulations

    David B. Swanson;John J. Norcini;Louis J. Grosso

  • Certifying examination performance and patient outcomes following acute myocardial infarction.

    John J Norcini;Rebecca S Lipner;Harry R Kimball

  • Certification and specialization: do they matter in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction?

    John J. Norcini;Harry R. Kimball;Rebecca S. Lipner

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy A. Shea
Judy A. Shea University of Pennsylvania
John R. Boulet
John R. Boulet Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research
David B. Swanson
David B. Swanson National Board of Medical Examiners
John M. Benson
John M. Benson Harvard University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Lincoln C. Chen
Lincoln C. Chen China Medical Board
Brian Clark Jolly
Brian Clark Jolly University of Newcastle Australia
Yvonne Steinert
Yvonne Steinert McGill University
David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic
Chris Roberts
Chris Roberts University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a broad range of careers, from mental health counseling to research, education, and social work. With growing demand for flexible learning, many reputable U.S. institutions now offer accessible, accredited programs in these fields.

If you're passionate about mental health, a psychology online degree is an excellent starting point. This pathway can lead to entry-level roles or further graduate study. For those interested in becoming licensed social workers quickly, a 1 year msw programs online no bsw option provides an accelerated route—even for students without a Bachelor of Social Work.

If your career goals include clinical practice or leadership in psychology, consider the advanced training offered by psy d programs. Alternatively, those looking to specialize in family and couples therapy may prefer a mft degree for licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist.

Each of these online pathways supports diverse interests and career goals within the social sciences, providing the flexibility modern students need.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Norcini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles