World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
29931
World Ranking
5083
National Ranking
341

Kim Bartholomew publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Bartholomew sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kim Bartholomew D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Bartholomew sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kim Bartholomew is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their academic profile shows engagement with the institution but does not document specific recent publications, co-authors, or awards presently.

While explicit details regarding Bartholomew's research papers, including titles, publication years, or venues, have not been recorded, the scientist's association with an established university suggests involvement in scholarly activities within their field.

No data on main or subfields of study, nor particular research topics, is currently available. Similarly, information on frequent publication venues or book publications has not been provided.

In the absence of detailed data on their research focus areas or collaborative networks, the overall profile remains limited to their academic affiliation with Simon Fraser University.

Best Publications

  • Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model

    Kim Bartholomew;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment.

    Dale W. Griffin;Kim Bartholomew

  • Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective

    Kim Bartholomew

  • The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment.

    Dale W. Griffin;Kim Bartholomew

  • Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning The Role of Interpersonal Control and Psychological Need Thwarting

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Richard M. Ryan;Jos A. Bosch

  • Intimacy‐Anger and Insecure Attachment as Precursors of Abuse in Intimate Relationships

    Donald G. Dutton;Keith Saunders;Andrew Starzomski;Kim Bartholomew

  • Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns.

    Elaine Scharfe;Kim Bartholomew

  • The Controlling Interpersonal Style in a Coaching Context: Development and Initial Validation of a Psychometric Scale

    Kimberley Bartholomew;Nikolaos Ntoumanis;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • Self-regulatory failure and intimate partner violence perpetration.

    Eli J. Finkel;C. Nathan DeWall;Erica B. Slotter;Megan Oaten

  • Methods of assessing adult attachment: Do they converge?

    Kim Bartholomew;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Hierarchies of Attachment Relationships in Young Adulthood

    Shanna J. Trinke;Kim Bartholomew

  • Interpersonal problems, attachment styles, and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Saul E. Rosenberg;Kim Bartholomew

  • A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: implications for sports coaches

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

  • Predicting the brighter and darker sides of interpersonal relationships: Does psychological need thwarting matter?

    Sebastiano Costa;Nikos Ntoumanis;Kimberley J. Bartholomew

  • The intergenerational transmission of relationship violence.

    Marilyn J. Kwong;Kim Bartholomew;Antonia J. Z. Henderson;Shanna J. Trinke

  • Attachment processes in adulthood

    Kim Bartholomew;Daniel Perlman

  • Job pressure and ill-health in physical education teachers : The mediating role of psychological need thwarting

    Kimberley Jane Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Ricardo Cuevas;Chris Lonsdale

  • Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Athanasios Mouratidis;Ermioni Katartzi

  • Love as a Battlefield: Attachment and Relationship Dynamics in Couples Identified for Male Partner Violence

    Colleen J. Allison;Kim Bartholomew;Ofra Mayseless;Donald G. Dutton

  • Gender Nonconformity, Childhood Rejection, and Adult Attachment: A Study of Gay Men

    Monica A. Landolt;Kim Bartholomew;Colleen Saffrey;Doug Oram

  • Attachment Styles Among Young Adults

    Kim Bartholomew;Leonard M. Horowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald G. Dutton
Donald G. Dutton University of British Columbia
Robert S. Hogg
Robert S. Hogg Simon Fraser University
Ofra Mayseless
Ofra Mayseless University of Haifa
Dale Griffin
Dale Griffin University of British Columbia
Leonard M. Horowitz
Leonard M. Horowitz Stanford University
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy University of California, San Francisco
Daniel Perlman
Daniel Perlman University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Evan Wood
Evan Wood University of British Columbia
Marlene M. Moretti
Marlene M. Moretti Simon Fraser University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue programs that prepare them for specialized roles, such as mental health counseling. These roles require not just a solid academic background, but also an understanding of local licensing and education requirements, which can vary by city and state.

For those interested in becoming counselors, it's important to be aware of the specific steps and standards in your area. For example, you can explore how to become a mental health counselor in Charlotte or learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Chesapeake. Each region has its own unique pathway and certification process.

If you are considering opportunities in larger cities, understanding the mental health counselor requirements in Chicago or the Chula Vista mental health counselor education requirements can help you map out your career goals. Online psychology degrees can make it easier to meet these requirements and launch a successful career in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Kim Bartholomew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles