World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leonard M. Horowitz

Leonard M. Horowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
18844
World Ranking
7687
National Ranking
4115

Leonard M. Horowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard M. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leonard M. Horowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard M. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Leonard M. Horowitz was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States during their academic career.

Throughout their career, Horowitz was recognized by professional organizations, notably receiving the award of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

As a deceased scholar, Horowitz's profile records no recent papers, co-authors, or specific research topics documented in the available data.

Their contributions remain associated with their affiliation and acknowledgment from the APA, reflecting a professional presence in the field of psychology or related disciplines at the time of their activity.

Best Publications

  • Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model

    Kim Bartholomew;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Saul E. Rosenberg;Barbara A. Baer;Gilbert Ureño

  • How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Kelly R. Wilson;Bulent Turan;Pavel Zolotsev

  • Interpersonal problems, attachment styles, and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Saul E. Rosenberg;Kim Bartholomew

  • When Do Opposites Attract? Interpersonal Complementarity Versus Similarity

    D. Christopher Dryer;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • Attributional style of lonely and depressed people.

    Craig A. Anderson;Leonard M. Horowitz;Rita D. French

  • Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology.

    Unknown

  • A priming methodology for studying self-representation in major depressive disorder.

    Zindel V. Segal;Michael Gemar;Catherine Truchon;Manal Guirguis

  • Satisfaction in interpersonal interactions as a function of similarity in level of dysphoria.

    Kenneth D. Locke;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology

    Unknown

  • On the cognitive structure of interpersonal problems treated in psychotherapy.

    Leonard M. Horowitz

  • The interpersonal basis of psychiatric symptoms

    Leonard M. Horowitz;John Vitkus

  • The Way to Console May Depend on the Goal: Experimental Studies of Social Support

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Elena N. Krasnoperova;Deborah G. Tatar;Mikkel B. Hansen

  • Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders : toward a core battery

    Hans H. Strupp;Leonard M. Horowitz;Michael J. Lambert

  • Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people

    Nicole Shechtman;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • Interpersonal problems of people who describe themselves as lonely.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Rita de Sales French

  • On averaging judges' ratings to increase their correlation with an external criterion.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Dillon Inouye;Ellen Y. Siegelman

  • When Do Opposites Attract ? Interpersonal Complementarity Versus Similarity

    Unknown

  • Attachment Styles Among Young Adults

    Kim Bartholomew;Leonard M. Horowitz

  • The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology. I. A method for deriving prototypes.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;J. C. Wright;Elizabeth Lowenstein;Harry W. Parad

  • The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology: II. Clarifying disagreement in psychiatric judgments.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Rita de Sales French;Kirk D. Wallis;David L. Post

  • Word fragments as aids to recall: The organization of a word

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Margaret A. White;Douglas W. Atwood

  • Availability and associative symmetry.

    Leonard M. Horowitz;Sandra A. Norman;Ruth S. Day

Frequent Co-Authors

Bulent Turan
Bulent Turan University of Alabama at Birmingham
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University
Kim Bartholomew
Kim Bartholomew Simon Fraser University
Michael J. Constantino
Michael J. Constantino University of Massachusetts Amherst
Bertram F. Malle
Bertram F. Malle Brown University
James G. Greeno
James G. Greeno University of Pittsburgh
Elmar Brähler
Elmar Brähler Leipzig University
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Zindel V. Segal
Zindel V. Segal University of Toronto
Lyn Y. Abramson
Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to multiple online pathways and rewarding careers, especially in counseling and mental health services. As the demand for qualified professionals grows, many universities now offer online counseling programs that are both flexible and affordable.

Choosing the right degree involves considering costs, accreditation, and program outcomes. If affordability is a priority, exploring the cheapest counseling programs in Seattle or the cheapest counseling programs in Tempe can help minimize student debt while still accessing high-quality education.

Many states offer their own budget-friendly options. For instance, you can find affordable counseling degrees in Texas and affordable counseling degrees in Utah that can be completed online or in a hybrid format. These programs typically prepare graduates for careers as licensed counselors, school psychologists, or mental health advocates.

Ultimately, online degrees in psychology and counseling can provide a direct route into a rewarding career pathway, while also offering cost-effective solutions for students across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard M. Horowitz

Recently Published Articles