World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marie-France Lafontaine

Marie-France Lafontaine

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3953
World Ranking
11370
National Ranking
792

Marie-France Lafontaine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-France Lafontaine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marie-France Lafontaine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-France Lafontaine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Selecting the Best Items for a Short-Form of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire

    Marie-France Lafontaine;Audrey Brassard;Yvan Lussier;Pierre Valois

  • Perceived Dimensions of Parenting and Non-suicidal Self-injury in Young Adults

    Jean-François Bureau;Jodi Martin;Nathalie Freynet;Alexane Alie Poirier

  • Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples.

    Katherine Péloquin;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Changes in Relationship-Specific Attachment in Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy

    Melissa Burgess Moser;Susan M. Johnson;Tracy L. Dalgleish;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Predicting Change in Marital Satisfaction Throughout Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy

    Tracy L. Dalgleish;Susan M. Johnson;Melissa Burgess Moser;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • A dyadic approach to the study of romantic attachment, dyadic empathy, and psychological partner aggression

    Katherine Péloquin;Marie-France Lafontaine;Audrey Brassard

  • How to Use the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) To Estimate Different Dyadic Patterns in MPLUS: A Step-by-Step Tutorial

    Josée Fitzpatrick;Alexandre Gareau;Marie-France Lafontaine;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Psychometric properties of the functions and addictive features scales of the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory: a preliminary investigation using a university sample.

    Jodi Martin;Paula F. Cloutier;Christine Levesque;Jean-François Bureau

  • Family-based risk factors for non-suicidal self-injury: Considering influences of maltreatment, adverse family-life experiences, and parent-child relational risk.

    Jodi Martin;Jean-François Bureau;Kim Yurkowski;Tania Renaud Fournier

  • Sexuality Examined Through the Lens of Attachment Theory: Attachment, Caregiving, and Sexual Satisfaction

    Katherine Péloquin;Audrey Brassard;Marie-France Lafontaine;Phillip R Shaver

  • The Influence of Romantic Attachment and Intimate Partner Violence on Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Young Adults

    Christine Levesque;Marie-France Lafontaine;Jean-François Bureau;Paula Cloutier

  • Structure bidimensionnelle de l'attachement amoureux: Anxiété face à l'abandon et évitement de l'intimité.

    Marie-France Lafontaine;Yvan Lussier

  • A comparison of invalidating family environment characteristics between university students engaging in self-injurious thoughts & actions and non-self-injuring university students.

    Jodi Martin;Jean-François Bureau;Paula Cloutier;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Two‐Year Follow‐up Outcomes in Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: An Investigation of Relationship Satisfaction and Attachment Trajectories

    Stephanie A. Wiebe;Susan M. Johnson;Marie-France Lafontaine;Melissa Burgess Moser

  • Intimacy and Couple Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Romantic Attachment

    Cathy Dandurand;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Attachment, trust, and satisfaction in relationships: Investigating actor, partner, and mediating effects

    Josée Fitzpatrick;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Comparisons of close relationships: An evaluation of relationship quality and patterns of attachment to parents, friends, and romantic partners in young adults.

    Angela Caron;Marie-France Lafontaine;Jean-François Bureau;Christine Levesque

  • Does Anger Towards the Partner Mediate and Moderate the Link Between Romantic Attachment and Intimate Violence

    Marie-France Lafontaine;Yvan Lussier

  • The functions and addictive features of non-suicidal self-injury: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Ottawa self-injury inventory in a university sample

    Camille Guérin-Marion;Jodi Martin;Audrey-Ann Deneault;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Dyadic Empathy, Dyadic Coping, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Model

    Christine Levesque;Marie-France Lafontaine;Angela Caron;Jamie Lyn Flesch

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan M. Johnson
Susan M. Johnson University of Ottawa
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Patrick Gaudreau
Patrick Gaudreau University of Ottawa
Stéphane Sabourin
Stéphane Sabourin Université Laval
Arie Nouwen
Arie Nouwen Middlesex University
Yves Bergeron
Yves Bergeron Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Norman B. Epstein
Norman B. Epstein University of Maryland, College Park
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Angelo Compare
Angelo Compare University of Bergamo
Louise Balfour
Louise Balfour Ottawa Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marie-France Lafontaine

Recently Published Articles