World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angelo Compare

Angelo Compare

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5128
World Ranking
10490
National Ranking
241

Angelo Compare publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Compare sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Angelo Compare D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Compare sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angelo Compare is affiliated with the University of Bergamo in Italy. Their research primarily spans psychology and medicine, with notable emphasis on clinical psychology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Their extensive publication record includes work in psychotherapy techniques, digital mental health interventions, cardiac health and mental health, COVID-19 and mental health, mental health research topics, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research.

Frequent publication venues for Angelo Compare include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Internet Interventions

Their recent papers include:

  • The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis (2020), Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Telepsychotherapy: a leaflet for psychotherapists in the age of COVID-19. A review of the evidence (2020), Counselling Psychology Quarterly
  • Recommendations for policy and practice of telepsychotherapy and e-mental health in Europe and beyond. (2020), Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
  • Online consultations in mental healthcare during the COVID-19 outbreak: An international survey study on professionals' motivations and perceived barriers (2021), Internet Interventions
  • Attachment, Personality and Locus of Control: Psychological Determinants of Risk Perception and Preventive Behaviors for COVID-19 (2021), Frontiers in Psychology

Among their frequent co-authors are Agostino Brugnera, Barbara Poletti, Antonino La Tona, Andrea Greco, and Vincenzo Silani, indicating collaboration across clinical and applied psychological research domains.

Angelo Compare's body of work reflects multidisciplinary interests centered on psychological and medical intersections, addressing both theoretical frameworks and emerging practices in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The prominence of digital mental health interventions and telemedicine within their research demonstrates an engagement with evolving modalities in healthcare delivery.

Best Publications

  • Internet- and Mobile-Based Psychological Interventions: Applications, Efficacy, and Potential for Improving Mental Health: A Report of the EFPA E-Health Taskforce

    David D. Ebert;Tom Van Daele;Tine Nordgreen;Maria Karekla

  • Weight loss expectations in obese patients and treatment attrition: an observational multicenter study.

    Riccardo Dalle Grave;Simona Calugi;Enrico Molinari;Maria Letizia Petroni

  • Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S).

    Enzo Grossi;Nicola Groth;Paola Mosconi;Renata Cerutti

  • Buddhist-Derived Loving-Kindness and Compassion Meditation for the Treatment of Psychopathology: a Systematic Review

    Edo Shonin;William Van Gordon;Angelo Compare;Masood Zangeneh

  • Emotional Regulation and Depression: A Potential Mediator between Heart and Mind

    Angelo Compare;Cristina Zarbo;Edo Shonin;William Van Gordon

  • Social support, depression, and heart disease: a ten year literature review

    Angelo Compare;Cristina Zarbo;Gian Mauro Manzoni;Gianluca Castelnuovo

  • The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Christoph Flückiger;Julian Rubel;A. C. Del Re;Adam O. Horvath

  • Integrative Psychotherapy Works

    Cristina Zarbo;Giorgio Angelo Tasca;Francesco Cattafi;Angelo Compare

  • Recommendations for policy and practice of telepsychotherapy and e-mental health in Europe and beyond

    Tom Van Daele;Maria Karekla;Angelos P. Kassianos;Angelo Compare

  • Psychological Distress in Morbid Obesity in Relation to Weight History

    Maria Letizia Petroni;Nicola Villanova;Sebastiano Avagnina;Maria Antonia Fusco

  • Reflective functioning moderates the association between perceptions of parental neglect and attachment in adolescence

    Jessica L. Borelli;Angelo Compare;Jonathan E. Snavely;Valentina Decio

  • Telepsychotherapy: a leaflet for psychotherapists in the age of COVID-19. A review of the evidence

    Barbara Poletti;Sofia Tagini;Agostino Brugnera;Laura Parolin

  • Online consultations in mental healthcare during the COVID-19 outbreak: An international survey study on professionals' motivations and perceived barriers

    Nele A.J. De Witte;Per Carlbring;Anne Etzelmueller;Anne Etzelmueller;Tine Nordgreen

  • Type D Personality Is Associated with the Development of Stress Cardiomyopathy Following Emotional Triggers

    Angelo Compare;Riccardo Bigi;Pedro Silva Orrego;Riccardo Proietti

  • Clinical psychology and heart disease

    Enrico Molinari;Gianfranco Parati;Angelo Compare

  • Clinical and psychological telemonitoring and telecare of high risk heart failure patients.

    Alessandra Villani;Gabriella Malfatto;Angelo Compare;Francesco Della Rosa

  • Short-term effects of a multi-disciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme on psychological well-being, exercise capacity and weight in a sample of obese in-patients with coronary heart disease: a practice-level study.

    Gian Mauro Manzoni;Valentina Villa;Angelo Compare;Gianluca Castelnuovo

  • Clinical Psychology and Cardiovascular Disease: An Up-to-Date Clinical Practice Review for Assessment and Treatment of Anxiety and Depression

    Angelo Compare;Elena Germani;Riccardo Proietti;David Janeway

  • Behavioral, cognitive, and emotional coping strategies of women with endometriosis: a critical narrative review.

    Cristina Zarbo;Agostino Brugnera;Luigi Frigerio;Chiara Malandrino

  • Heart rate variability during acute psychosocial stress: A randomized cross-over trial of verbal and non-verbal laboratory stressors.

    Agostino Brugnera;Cristina Zarbo;Mika P. Tarvainen;Paolo Marchettini

Frequent Co-Authors

Enrico Molinari
Enrico Molinari Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Giulio Marchesini
Giulio Marchesini University of Bologna
Gianfranco Parati
Gianfranco Parati University of Milano-Bicocca
Maria Karekla
Maria Karekla University of Cyprus
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Riccardo Dalle Grave
Riccardo Dalle Grave University of Verona
Edo Shonin
Edo Shonin Nottingham Trent University
Gianluca Lo Coco
Gianluca Lo Coco University of Palermo
Simona Calugi
Simona Calugi University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology doesn’t just lead to a single career path—there’s a wide range of opportunities available. Many students begin by identifying the top psychology degrees in Fairfax or other leading locations to set a solid foundation in the field. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility for working professionals and those needing scheduling freedom.

When considering where to study, state-specific rankings are important. For instance, students searching for the best psychology degree rankings in Florida can compare programs based on quality, specialization, and career outcomes. These rankings help inform smart choices about where to apply and what program best fits individual goals.

There are also highly regarded programs across the country, such as the top psychology programs in Georgia and respected institutions like those offering top psychology programs in Grand Forks. Graduates can pursue careers as therapists, counselors, human resources specialists, or in research and clinical roles. The expanding importance of mental health means strong demand across many industries, making psychology a versatile and rewarding major for online learners.

Best Scientists Citing Angelo Compare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles