World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
80
Citations
15947
World Ranking
4188
National Ranking
315

Chemistry

D-Index
73
Citations
13156
World Ranking
5139
National Ranking
299

Jane Thomas-Oates publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Thomas-Oates sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 228 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jane Thomas-Oates D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Thomas-Oates sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Thomas-Oates is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their primary research focus lies in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, they concentrate on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Spectroscopy, and Archeology.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass Vibrio bacteria research studies, Plant and animal studies, Identification and Quantification in Food, Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis, Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, as well as Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies.

Among the frequent publication venues for their work are STAR Science & Technology of Archaeological Research and Metabolites, where they have multiple contributions. Other venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Environmental Microbiology.

Jane Thomas-Oates has collaborated regularly with several researchers, notably Ed Bergström, Isabella Gaffney, Isabel M. López-Lara, Otto Geiger, and Roberto Jhonatan Olea-Ozuna.

Their recent publications include:

  • Is it possible to identify ancient wine production using biomolecular approaches? (2020), published in STAR Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
  • Five structural genes required for ceramide synthesis in Caulobacter and for bacterial survival (2020), published in Environmental Microbiology
  • Pinus pinaster Early Hormonal Defence Responses to Pinewood Nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) Infection (2021), published in Metabolites
  • Exploitation of an ancestral pheromone biosynthetic pathway contributes to diversification in Heliconius butterflies (2022), published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Metabolomic Approaches to Studying the Response to Drought Stress in Corn (Zea mays) Cobs (2021), published in Metabolites

Best Publications

  • Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

    Michael Buckley;Matthew Collins;Jane Thomas-Oates;Julie C. Wilson

  • Mass spectrometry-based plant metabolomics: Metabolite responses to abiotic stress.

    Tiago F. Jorge;João A. Rodrigues;Camila Caldana;Romy Schmidt

  • Characterization of two Pseudomonas putida lipopeptide biosurfactants, putisolvin I and II, which inhibit biofilm formation and break down existing biofilms

    Irene Kuiper;Ellen L. Lagendijk;Russell Pickford;Jeremy P. Derrick

  • Ancient proteins resolve the evolutionary history of Darwin’s South American ungulates

    Frido Welker;Matthew J. Collins;Jessica A. Thomas;Marc Wadsley

  • Biocontrol by Phenazine-1-carboxamide-Producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 of Tomato Root Rot Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici

    T. F. C. Chin-A-Woeng;G. V. Bloemberg;A. J. van der Bij;K. M. G. M. van der Drift

  • Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide

    Mike Buckley;Sarah Whitcher Kansa;Sarah Howard;Stuart Campbell

  • Structures of the glycoinositolphospholipids from Leishmania major. A family of novel galactofuranose-containing glycolipids.

    M J McConville;S W Homans;J E Thomas-Oates;A Dell

  • Structure of the lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania major.

    M. J. Mcconville;J. E. Thomas-Oates;M. A. J. Ferguson;S. W. Homans

  • Protein sequences bound to mineral surfaces persist into deep time.

    Beatrice Demarchi;Shaun Hall;Teresa Roncal-Herrero;Colin Freeman

  • Introduction of the phzH gene of Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 extends the range of biocontrol ability of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid-producing Pseudomonas spp. strains.

    Thomas F. C. Chin-A-Woeng;Jane E. Thomas-Oates;Ben J. J. Lugtenberg;Guido V. Bloemberg

  • Structures of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchors from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Christoph Fankhauser;Steve W. Homans;Jane E. Thomas-Oates;Malcolm J. McConville

  • Metabolomic applications of HILIC-LC-MS.

    Simon Cubbon;Carla Antonio;Julie Wilson;Jane Thomas-Oates

  • Analysis of the pmsCEAB Gene Cluster Involved in Biosynthesis of Salicylic Acid and the Siderophore Pseudomonine in the Biocontrol Strain Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374

    J. Mercado-Blanco;K.M.G.M. van der Drift;P.E. Olsson;J.E. Thomas-Oates

  • Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in the resurrection glacial relic Haberlea rhodopensis.

    Tsanko S. Gechev;Maria Benina;Toshihiro Obata;Takayuki Tohge

  • Temporal and spatial variation in pharmaceutical concentrations in an urban river system

    Emily E. Burns;Laura J. Carter;Dana W. Kolpin;Jane Thomas-Oates

  • Phenazine-1-Carboxamide Production in the Biocontrol Strain Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 Is Regulated by Multiple Factors Secreted into the Growth Medium

    Thomas F. C. Chin-A-Woeng;Daan van den Broek;Gert de Voer;Koen M. G. M. van der Drift

  • Effect of genetically modified Pseudomonas putida WCS358r on the fungal rhizosphere microflora of field-grown wheat.

    Debora C. M. Glandorf;Patrick Verheggen;Timo Jansen;Jan-Willem Jorritsma

  • The regulator gene phoB mediates phosphate stress-controlled synthesis of the membrane lipid diacylglyceryl-N,N,N-trimethylhomoserine in Rhizobium (Sinorhizobium) meliloti.

    Otto Geiger;Viola Röhrs;Barbara Weissenmayer;Turlough M. Finan

  • Structural identification of the iipo‐chitin oligosaccharide nodulation signals of Rhizobium loti

    Isabel M. López‐Lara;Jorrit D. J. van den Berg;Jane E. Thomas‐Oates;John Glushka

  • Biocontrol of avocado dematophora root rot by antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens PCL1606 correlates with the production of 2-hexyl 5-propyl resorcinol.

    Francisco M. Cazorla;Simon B. Duckett;Ed T. Bergström;Sadaf Noreen

Frequent Co-Authors

Herman P. Spaink
Herman P. Spaink Leiden University
Ben J. J. Lugtenberg
Ben J. J. Lugtenberg Leiden University
Johan Haverkamp
Johan Haverkamp Utrecht University
Matthew J. Collins
Matthew J. Collins University of Cambridge
Guido V. Bloemberg
Guido V. Bloemberg University of Zurich
Otto Holst
Otto Holst Research Center Borstel - Leibniz-Center for Medicine and Biosciences
Johannes F.G. Vliegenthart
Johannes F.G. Vliegenthart Utrecht University
Johannis P. Kamerling
Johannis P. Kamerling Utrecht University
Michael Buckley
Michael Buckley University of Manchester
Michael A. J. Ferguson
Michael A. J. Ferguson University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up diverse career opportunities for students interested in Biology and Biochemistry. Many choose accelerated graduate programs, such as the shortest pmhnp program, to quickly enter specialized healthcare roles. Others pursue an online nutrition degree to build expertise in the rapidly growing field of nutrition and wellness.

For students considering a leadership track, an affordable online mba in healthcare management can provide the business skills necessary to manage healthcare organizations effectively. Additionally, credentials such as certified professional coder are valuable for those interested in medical coding and informatics, which are becoming essential in today’s healthcare industry.

These flexible online options allow students from Biology or Biochemistry backgrounds to specialize, advance their education, and prepare for rewarding careers in health, management, or research-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Thomas-Oates

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles