World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10532 9855 602 587 126 4762

Pamela Meredith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pamela Meredith between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pamela Meredith published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2022. 23 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2022. 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
1999 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pamela Meredith: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 1
2010 3
2011 5
2012 7
2013 3
2014 7
2015 12
2016 11
2017 14
2018 9
2019 7
2020 10
2021 14
2022 16
2023 10
2024 14
2025 9
Total 177
Download as CSV

Pamela Meredith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Meredith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pamela Meredith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Meredith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pamela Meredith is affiliated with the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, with primary contributions in Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions. Within these broader areas, their work frequently addresses subfields including Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Social Psychology.

Their research topics cover a range of issues related to mental health, development, and occupational therapy. Key areas of focus include:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Pamela Meredith has published in various respected academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
  • British Journal of Occupational Therapy
  • Burns
  • Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Pamela Meredith include:

  • "Experiences of Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and Their Families: A Critical Review," 2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • "Shame and guilt in the postnatal period: a systematic review," 2020, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
  • "Cancer care and occupational therapy: A scoping review," 2020, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
  • "The Craft of Generalism clinical skills and attitudes for whole person care," 2021, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
  • "'Why didn't you just give them PRN?': A qualitative study investigating the factors influencing implementation of sensory modulation approaches in inpatient mental health units," 2020, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Pamela Meredith are:

  • Sally Bennett
  • Lachlan Kerley
  • Koa Whittingham
  • Lisa Wright
  • Jenny Strong

The scientist's scholarly output demonstrates a multidisciplinary approach with an emphasis on clinical psychological perspectives, health professions, and pediatric care. Their collaborations and choice of publication venues reflect engagement with occupational therapy, mental health nursing, and reproductive psychology communities.

Best Publications

  • Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review

    Tracey Fay-Stammbach;David J. Hawes;Pamela Meredith

  • A review of the evidence linking adult attachment theory and chronic pain: presenting a conceptual model.

    Pamela Meredith;Tamara Ownsworth;Jenny Strong

  • Adult attachment, anxiety, and pain self-efficacy as predictors of pain intensity and disability.

    Pamela Meredith;Jenny Strong;Judith A. Feeney

  • Activity Pacing, Avoidance, Endurance, and Associations With Patient Functioning in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Nicole E. Andrews;Jennifer Strong;Pamela J. Meredith

  • The relationship of adult attachment to emotion, catastrophizing, control, threshold and tolerance, in experimentally-induced pain.

    Pamela J. Meredith;Jenny Strong;Judith A. Feeney

  • Adult attachment variables predict depression before and after treatment for chronic pain

    Pamela J. Meredith;Jenny Strong;Judith A. Feeney

  • Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults

    Sally Bennett;Amanda Pigott;Elaine M Beller;Terry Haines

  • Enhancing retention of occupational therapists working in mental health: Relationships between wellbeing at work and turnover intention

    Justin Newton Scanlan;Pamela Meredith;Anne A. Poulsen

  • Associations Between Maternal-Foetal Attachment and Infant Developmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

    Grace Branjerdporn;Pamela Meredith;Jenny Strong;Jenniffer Garcia

  • Evidence of a relationship between adult attachment variables and appraisals of chronic pain.

    Pamela J Meredith;Jenny Strong;Judith A Feeney

  • Understanding the Influence of Traditional Cultural Values on Indonesian Parenting

    Yulina Eva Riany;Pamela Meredith;Monica Cuskelly

  • Associations among Gender, Coping Patterns and Functioning for Individuals with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

    Nina El-Shormilisy;Jenny Strong;Pamela J Meredith

  • Stress and burnout among healthcare professionals working in a mental health setting in Singapore

    Suyi Yang;Suyi Yang;Pamela Meredith;Asaduzzaman Khan

  • Burnout and Work Engagement in Occupational Therapists

    Anne A Poulsen;Pamela Meredith;Asaduzzaman Khan;Julie Henderson

  • Cultural Beliefs about Autism in Indonesia

    Yulina Eva Riany;Monica Cuskelly;Pamela Meredith

  • Effectiveness of Mindfulness Intervention in Reducing Stress and Burnout for Mental Health Professionals in Singapore

    Yang Suyi;Pamela Meredith;Asaduzzaman Khan

  • Attachment and Infant Difficultness in Postnatal Depression

    Pamela Meredith;Patricia Noller

  • "It's very hard to change yourself": an exploration of overactivity in people with chronic pain using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

    Nicole Emma Andrews;Jenny Strong;Pamela Joy Meredith;Kellie Gordon

  • Adult Attachment, Sensory Processing, and Distress in Healthy Adults.

    Pamela J. Meredith;Kirsty J. Bailey;Jenny Strong;Georgia Rappel

  • “Not just a normal mum”: a qualitative investigation of a support service for women who are pregnant subsequent to perinatal loss

    Pamela Meredith;Trish Wilson;Grace Branjerdporn;Jenny Strong

Frequent Co-Authors

Jenny Strong
Jenny Strong University of Queensland
Jenny Ziviani
Jenny Ziviani University of Queensland
Monica Cuskelly
Monica Cuskelly University of Tasmania
Judith A. Feeney
Judith A. Feeney University of Queensland
Patricia Noller
Patricia Noller University of Queensland
Tamara Ownsworth
Tamara Ownsworth Griffith University
Geoffrey Mitchell
Geoffrey Mitchell University of Queensland
David J. Hawes
David J. Hawes University of Sydney
Brian Head
Brian Head University of Queensland
John F. Kelly
John F. Kelly Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous related fields and online degree options. One popular pathway is pursuing a career in social work, where understanding human behavior and mental health is essential. Many top universities now offer flexible, accredited online programs that cater to working professionals and students with diverse needs.

If you’re interested in social work, consider researching the top social work degrees in Salt Lake City. These programs emphasize strong community ties and hands-on experience. For those located on the west coast, there are also leading top social work programs in San Diego that connect students to large, diverse urban populations.

The Pacific Northwest is known for its innovative and inclusive education, with universities featuring top social work programs in Tacoma. For a broader perspective, explore the top social work degrees in USA to compare national options and find the best fit for your goals.

Whether you’re planning for an online degree or mapping your career, psychology and social work are closely linked fields that offer rewarding, people-centered pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela Meredith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles