World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie M. Carlson

Stephanie M. Carlson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3944 3636 2209 1989 107 27558

Stephanie M. Carlson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie M. Carlson between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie M. Carlson published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2021. 14 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2021. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
1993 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie M. Carlson: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 5
2005 8
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 4
2012 3
2013 6
2014 6
2015 6
2016 4
2017 5
2018 5
2019 4
2020 5
2021 10
2022 5
2023 4
2024 8
2025 6
Total 123
Download as CSV

Stephanie M. Carlson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie M. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie M. Carlson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie M. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Stephanie M. Carlson is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work centers around early childhood education and development, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, cognitive abilities and testing, child and animal learning development, infant development and preterm care, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, and the intersection of neuroscience, education, and cognitive function.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Child Development
  • Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • Child Neuropsychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Their recent papers reflect a focus on executive function, family resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of screen use among children, and developmental systems perspectives. Selected recent publications include:

  • The neurodevelopment of executive function skills: Implications for academic achievement gaps (2020, Psychology & Neuroscience)
  • Family resilience and psychological distress in the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study (2021, Developmental Psychology)
  • Children's screen and problematic media use in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, Child Development)
  • Reconciling the Context-Dependency and Domain-Generality of Executive Function Skills from a Developmental Systems Perspective (2022, Journal of Cognition and Development)
  • Pretending with realistic and fantastical stories facilitates executive function in 3-year-old children (2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include Philip David Zelazo, Ann S. Masten, Rebecca Distefano, Jasmine R. Ernst, and Lauren Eales.

Stephanie M. Carlson was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind.

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Louis J. Moses

  • Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children.

    Stephanie M. Carlson

  • From External Regulation to Self‐Regulation: Early Parenting Precursors of Young Children’s Executive Functioning

    Annie Bernier;Stephanie M. Carlson;Natasha Whipple

  • Hot and Cool Executive Function in Childhood and Adolescence: Development and Plasticity

    Philip David Zelazo;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children.

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Andrew N. Meltzoff

  • How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Louis J. Moses;Casey Breton

  • Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Dorothy J. Mandell;Luke Williams

  • Inhibitory Control and Emotion Regulation in Preschool Children.

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Tiffany S. Wang

  • The Development of Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Preschoolers

    Mark A. Sabbagh;Fen Xu;Stephanie M. Carlson;Louis J. Moses

  • Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability

    Stephanie M Carlson;Louis J Moses;Laura J Claxton

  • The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Louis J. Moses;Hollie R. Hix

  • Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: a closer look at the caregiving environment

    Annie Bernier;Stephanie M. Carlson;Marie Deschênes;Célia Matte-Gagné

  • The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind

    Marjorie Taylor;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • The development of executive function in childhood.

    Philip David Zelazo;Stephanie M. Carlson;Amanda Kesek

  • Less Is More Executive Function and Symbolic Representation in Preschool Children

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Angela C. Davis;Jamie G. Leach

  • Preschool Children's Performance in Task Switching on the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task: Separating the Dimensions Aids the Ability to Switch

    Adele Diamond;Stephanie M. Carlson;Danielle M. Beck

  • Executive Function in Context: Development, Measurement, Theory, and Experience

    Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Executive Function in Preschool Children: Test-Retest Reliability.

    Danielle M. Beck;Catherine Schaefer;Karen Pang;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Self-Regulation and School Success

    Angela Lee Duckworth;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Executive Function, Pretend Play, and Imagination

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Rachel E. White

  • Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: Culture and Developmental Systems

    Maria D Sera;Michael P Maratsos;Stephanie M Carlson

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip David Zelazo
Philip David Zelazo University of Minnesota
Marjorie Taylor
Marjorie Taylor University of Oregon
Louis J. Moses
Louis J. Moses University of Oregon
Annie Bernier
Annie Bernier University of Montreal
Ann S. Masten
Ann S. Masten University of Minnesota
Mark A. Sabbagh
Mark A. Sabbagh Queen's University
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Ethan Kross
Ethan Kross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Julie Carrier
Julie Carrier University of Montreal
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education and career options across the United States. Many students are interested in becoming licensed mental health counselors. The path to licensure can vary significantly by location, including specific educational requirements, supervised clinical hours, and state exams.

For instance, those interested in practicing in Minneapolis should review the Minneapolis mental health counselor certification requirements to understand the credentials needed locally. Likewise, students planning to start their careers in Nashville can explore how to become a mental health counselor in Nashville for up-to-date steps and guidelines.

Each city and state may have unique pathways. For example, individuals considering work in Louisiana should look into how to become a mental health counselor in New Orleans to review local procedures. If you are aiming for opportunities in New York, check how to become a mental health counselor in New York City for a detailed guide on state requirements.

Exploring these resources helps you select the right online degree program and prepares you for your chosen career path in mental health counseling, no matter where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie M. Carlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles