World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
7652
World Ranking
11062
National Ranking
5776

Marjorie Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjorie Taylor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marjorie Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjorie Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marjorie Taylor is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on psychology, complemented by contributions in arts and humanities as well as neuroscience.

The main fields of study for Taylor's work include:

  • Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, they have delved into several subfields, including:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their research topics cover a variety of areas related to learning, memory, culture, and creativity. The main topics addressed are:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience

Marjorie Taylor has published research papers and books, including work featured in notable journals and academic publishers. Their most recent paper is titled Imaginary Companions in Childhood: What Can Prospective Longitudinal Research Tell Us About Their Fate by Adolescence?, published in 2020 in The Journal of Creative Behavior. This journal is also a frequent venue for their publications.

Notable co-authors who have collaborated with Taylor include:

  • Naomi R. Aguiar
  • Helena M. McAnally
  • Bridget Forsyth
  • Elaine Reese

In addition to journal articles, Taylor has academic book publications. One such book is Imaginary Friends and the People Who Create Them, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?

    James W Tanaka;Marjorie Taylor

  • Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds?

    Myron Rothbart;Marjorie Taylor

  • Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them

    Marjorie Taylor

  • The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind

    Marjorie Taylor;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Children's understanding of knowledge acquisition: the tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned.

    Marjorie Taylor;Bonnie M. Esbensen;Robert T. Bennett

  • How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects.

    Susan A. Gelman;Marjorie Taylor

  • Conceptual perspective taking: children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see.

    Marjorie Taylor

  • The characteristics and correlates of fantasy in school-age children: imaginary companions, impersonation, and social understanding.

    Marjorie Taylor;Stephanie M. Carlson;Bayta L. Maring;Lynn Gerow

  • A developmental investigation of children's imaginary companions.

    Marjorie Taylor;Bridget S. Cartwright;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Neural correlates of theory-of-mind reasoning: an event-related potential study.

    Mark A. Sabbagh;Marjorie Taylor

  • Perspective taking and theory of mind: do children predict interpretive diversity as a function of differences in observers' knowledge?

    Marjorie Taylor;Bridget S. Cartwright;Thomas Bowden

  • Adjectives and Nouns: Children's Strategies for Learning New Words.

    Marjorie Taylor;Susan A. Gelman

  • The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own?

    Marjorie Taylor;Sara D. Hodges;Adèle Kohányi

  • Children's ability to distinguish fantasy events from real-life events

    Adrienne Samuels;Marjorie Taylor

  • Learning from Fantasy and Real Characters in Preschool and Kindergarten.

    Rebekah A. Richert;Alison B. Shawber;Ruth E. Hoffman;Marjorie Taylor

  • The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination

    Marjorie Taylor

  • Imaginary Companions and Impersonated Characters: Sex Differences in Children's Fantasy Play

    Stephanie M. Carlson;Marjorie Taylor

  • Incorporating new words into the lexicon: preliminary evidence for language hierarchies in two-year-old children.

    Marjorie Taylor;Susan A. Gelman

  • The Development of Children’s Ability to Fill the Gaps in Their Knowledge by Consulting Experts

    Naomi R. Aguiar;Caryn J. Stoess;Marjorie Taylor

  • Children's behavioral understanding of knowledge acquisition

    Bonnie M. Esbensen;Marjorie Taylor;Caryn Stoess

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie M. Carlson
Stephanie M. Carlson University of Minnesota
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark A. Sabbagh
Mark A. Sabbagh Queen's University
Pascal Boyer
Pascal Boyer Washington University in St. Louis
Philip A. Fisher
Philip A. Fisher Stanford University
Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University
David L. Hamilton
David L. Hamilton University of California, Santa Barbara
Elaine Reese
Elaine Reese University of Otago
Michael J. Chandler
Michael J. Chandler University of British Columbia
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Whether you are looking for flexible study options or seeking a program that matches your career aspirations, online psychology degrees offer you numerous opportunities.

Many students are now exploring best online psychology degree programs ranking in Texas to find high-quality, accredited online options in major states. Other learners cast a wider net, reviewing the top online psychology programs in USA for national comparisons and to identify flexible programs that fit any schedule.

For those with a specific geographic focus, such as the Midwest, researching online psychology programs in Wisconsin can help narrow down institutions with strong local reputations. Similarly, students interested in the Northeast may consider the best psychology degree programs ranking in Albany for campus-based or blended learning opportunities.

With these options, graduates can pursue diverse fields such as counseling, organizational psychology, and academic research, all supported by the flexibility and accessibility of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Marjorie Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles