World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Robinson

Elizabeth J. Robinson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7332 6838 728 694 137 6366

Elizabeth J. Robinson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth J. Robinson between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth J. Robinson published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2022. 16 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2022. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1976 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth J. Robinson: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 4
1978 2
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 3
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 4
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 4
1993 5
1994 6
1995 6
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 4
2004 3
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 7
2009 6
2010 2
2011 7
2012 3
2013 6
2014 8
2015 2
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 9
2023 9
2024 9
2025 7
Total 180
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Robinson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Robinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Robinson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Robinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth J. Robinson is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on how environmental and health issues intersect.

Robinson's work addresses several subfields within environmental science, including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • General Health Professions
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Soil Science

Their published research covers topics such as:

  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Agricultural Risk and Resilience
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Elizabeth J. Robinson has contributed to a number of significant reports and studies published in major scientific venues, particularly within The Lancet and other related journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises (2020, The Lancet)
  • The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels (2022, The Lancet)
  • The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future (2021, The Lancet)
  • The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms (2023, The Lancet)
  • The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: facing record-breaking threats from delayed action (2024, The Lancet)

Their frequent collaborators reflect interdisciplinary and international partnerships. These include:

  • Shouro Dasgupta
  • Marina Romanello
  • Rachel Lowe
  • Joacim Rocklöv
  • Jan C. Semenza

Elizabeth J. Robinson's work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • The Lancet
  • Environmental and Resource Economics
  • Land
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Lancet Public Health

Best Publications

  • Children's Thinking About Counterfactuals and Future Hypotheticals as Possibilities

    Sarah R. Beck;Elizabeth J. Robinson;Daniel J. Carroll;Ian A. Apperly

  • Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality

    Kevin J. Riggs;Donald M. Peterson;Elizabeth J. Robinson;Peter Mitchell

  • Shared workspaces: how do they work and when are they useful?

    Steve Whittaker;Erik Geelhoed;Elizabeth Robinson

  • Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials

    Elizabeth Robinson;CE Kerr;Andrew Stevens;Richard Lilford

  • The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences

    M. Torrance;G.V. Thomas;E.J. Robinson

  • Children's trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well or poorly informed: when past errors can be excused.

    Erika Nurmsoo;Elizabeth J. Robinson

  • Contamination in reasoning about false belief: an instance of realist bias in adults but not children

    P. Mitchell;E.J. Robinson;J.E. Isaacs;R.M. Nye

  • Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: A longitudinal study

    Mark Torrance;Glyn V. Thomas;Elizabeth J. Robinson

  • Children's suggestibility in relation to their understanding about sources of knowledge.

    Elizabeth J. Robinson;E. L. Whitcombe

  • Masking of Children's Early Understanding of the Representational Mind: Backwards Explanation versus Prediction

    E. J. Robinson;P. Mitchell

  • What is difficult about counterfactual reasoning

    Elizabeth J. Robinson;Sarah Beck

  • Identifying unreliable informants: do children excuse past inaccuracy?

    Erika Nurmsoo;Elizabeth J. Robinson

  • Children's understanding of the relation between expressions (what was said) and intentions (what was meant)

    Elizabeth Robinson;Hillel Goelman;David R. Olson

  • Children's understanding about white lies

    K. A. Broomfield;E. J. Robinson;W. P. Robinson

  • When Being Right Is Not Enough Four-Year-Olds Distinguish Knowledgeable Informants From Merely Accurate Informants

    Shiri Einav;Elizabeth J. Robinson

  • Children's mental representation of referential relations

    I.A Apperly;E.J Robinson

  • When can children handle referential opacity? Evidence for systematic variation in 5- and 6-year-old children’s reasoning about beliefs and belief reports

    I.A Apperly;E.J Robinson

  • Children's ability to infer utterance veracity from speaker informedness.

    E. J. Robinson;H. Champion;P. Mitchell

  • Individual differences in the writing behaviour of undergraduate students

    Mark Torrance;Glyn V. Thomas;Elizabeth J. Robinson

  • Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials

    Elizabeth J Robinson;Cicely Kerr;Andrew Stevens;Richard Lilford

  • Improving the efficiency of patients' comprehension monitoring: a way of increasing patients' participation in general practice consultations.

    E.J. Robinson;M.J. Whitfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah R. Beck
Sarah R. Beck University of Birmingham
Ian A. Apperly
Ian A. Apperly University of Birmingham
Alan Richardson
Alan Richardson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University
David R. Olson
David R. Olson University of Toronto
Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Kathleen H. Corriveau
Kathleen H. Corriveau Boston University
Elizabeth A. Maylor
Elizabeth A. Maylor University of Warwick
Robin Banerjee
Robin Banerjee University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA offers a versatile foundation for exploring many rewarding careers. One of the most popular career paths is social work, a field that frequently intersects with psychological principles and skills. Many students pursue advanced or alternative qualifications in Social Work due to its strong job outlook and the value it brings to diverse communities.

If affordability is important, there are several options to consider. For instance, the cheapest social work degrees in Ohio and affordable social work programs in Pennsylvania provide excellent pathways for students seeking cost-effective online and campus-based programs.

Those located in the Pacific Northwest or Texas also have accessible options. Explore the cheapest social work degrees in Portland or consider the cheapest social work programs in San Antonio for local and online opportunities. Each of these programs supports flexible, practical training that can seamlessly complement your psychology background and expand your career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Robinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles