World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5793
World Ranking
7988
National Ranking
787

Teresa McCormack publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teresa McCormack sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Teresa McCormack D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teresa McCormack sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Teresa McCormack is affiliated with Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom and has a research portfolio focused mainly on psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, general decision sciences, developmental and educational psychology, and applied psychology.

The researcher has contributed extensively to the study of decision-making and behavioral economics, psychological and temporal perspectives, behavioral health and interventions, child and animal learning development, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and mind wandering and attention.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Synthese
  • Developmental Psychology
  • British Journal of Health Psychology

Some of Teresa McCormack's recent published papers are:

  • "Exploring people's beliefs about the experience of time," 2020, Synthese
  • "Temporal Binding, Causation, and Agency: Developing a New Theoretical Framework," 2020, Cognitive Science
  • "Regret and Decision-Making: A Developmental Perspective," 2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • "More Later: Delay of Gratification and Thought About the Future in Children," 2021, Child Development
  • "Human Vision Reconstructs Time to Satisfy Causal Constraints," 2022, Psychological Science

Teresa McCormack regularly collaborates with several co-authors including Christoph Hoerl, Aidan Feeney, Sarah R. Beck, Sara Lorimer, and Patrick A. O'Connor. The volume of co-authored publications suggests ongoing contributions within a network of researchers in related fields.

Best Publications

  • Joint attention : communication and other minds : issues in philosophy and psychology

    Naomi Eilan;Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack;Johannes Roessler

  • Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds

    Naomi Eilan;Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack;Johannes Roessler

  • Planning in young children: A review and synthesis

    Teresa McCormack;Cristina M. Atance

  • Developmental changes in time estimation: comparing childhood and old age.

    Teresa McCormack;Gordon D. A. Brown;Elizabeth A. Maylor;Richard J. Darby

  • Memory and temporal perspective: The role of temporal frameworks in memory development.

    Teresa McCormack;Christoph Hoerl

  • Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition

    Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack

  • Duration judgements in patients with schizophrenia.

    Brita Elvevåg;Teresa McCormack;Teresa McCormack;A. Gilbert;A. Gilbert;G. D. A. Brown;G. D. A. Brown

  • Searching and planning: young children's reasoning about past and future event sequences.

    Kerry L. McColgan;Teresa McCormack

  • Making Decisions about the Future

    Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack

  • The development of regret

    Eimear O'Connor;Teresa McCormack;Aidan Feeney

  • Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology.

    Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack

  • Children's Reasoning about the Temporal Order of Past and Future Events.

    Teresa McCormack;Mary Hanley

  • Joint reminiscing as joint attention to the past

    Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack

  • Children's reasoning about the causal significance of the temporal order of events.

    Teresa McCormack;Christoph Hoerl

  • Young children's reasoning about the order of past events

    Teresa McCormack;Christoph Hoerl

  • The development of temporal concepts: Learning to locate events in time

    Teresa McCormack;Christoph Hoerl

  • The prevalence of specific learning disorder in mathematics and comorbidity with other developmental disorders in primary school-age children.

    Kinga Morsanyi;Bianca M.C.W. van Bers;Teresa McCormack;Jemma McGourty

  • Do Children Who Experience Regret Make Better Decisions? A Developmental Study of the Behavioral Consequences of Regret

    Eimear O'Connor;Teresa McCormack;Aidan Feeney

  • Temporal Decentering and the Development of Temporal Concepts

    Teresa McCormack;Christoph Hoerl

  • Temporal information and children's and adults' causal inferences

    Patrick Burns;Teresa McCormack

  • Identification of tone duration, line length, and letter position: an experimental approach to timing and working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

    Brita Elvevag;Gordon D. A. Brown;Teresa Mccormack;Janet I. Vousden

  • Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding CausationIssues in Philosophy and Psychology

    Christoph Hoerl;Teresa McCormack;Sarah R. Beck

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah R. Beck
Sarah R. Beck University of Birmingham
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
Tom Beckers
Tom Beckers KU Leuven
Terry E. Goldberg
Terry E. Goldberg Columbia University
Daniel R. Weinberger
Daniel R. Weinberger Johns Hopkins University
Brita Elvevåg
Brita Elvevåg University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Elizabeth A. Maylor
Elizabeth A. Maylor University of Warwick
Rhiannon N. Turner
Rhiannon N. Turner Queen's University Belfast
James A. Russell
James A. Russell Boston College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, including pathways in social work. The requirements for becoming a social worker vary by state, often necessitating a specialized degree in addition to core psychology studies. Understanding these requirements is crucial if you wish to use your psychology education in a social services context.

For instance, if you plan to practice in Arkansas, you should review the social worker degree requirements in Arkansas to learn about necessary credentials and academic pathways. Those interested in working on the West Coast should consult information on the degree needed to be a social worker in California, where licensing standards and educational prerequisites may differ.

For students targeting Colorado, check the Colorado minimum degree requirement for social workers to ensure your degree aligns with state criteria. In the Northeast, it's important to know the Connecticut education requirements for social workers to understand what is needed for practice there.

Aligning your psychology studies with state-specific requirements helps open rewarding careers in social work and related fields, both on-campus and online.

Best Scientists Citing Teresa McCormack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles