World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6352
World Ranking
8274
National Ranking
76

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6399
World Ranking
8089
National Ranking
39

Brita Elvevåg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brita Elvevåg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 137 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brita Elvevåg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brita Elvevåg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brita Elvevåg is affiliated with the University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology, focusing significantly on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, artificial intelligence, and clinical psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, mental health research, digital mental health interventions, dementia and cognitive impairment research, topic modeling, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, and mental health via writing.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Psychiatry Research
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • npj Digital Medicine
  • Cortex

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Brita Elvevåg are:

  • "Validating digital phenotyping technologies for clinical use: the critical importance of "resolution"" (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • "Applying speech technologies to assess verbal memory in patients with serious mental illness" (2020, npj Digital Medicine)
  • "Natural Language Processing Markers for Psychosis and Other Psychiatric Disorders: Emerging Themes and Research Agenda From a Cross-Linguistic Workshop" (2023, Schizophrenia Bulletin)
  • "The mental health consequences on children of the war in Ukraine: A commentary" (2022, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Improving the Applicability of AI for Psychiatric Applications through Human-in-the-loop Methodologies" (2022, Schizophrenia Bulletin)

Brita Elvevåg has collaborated frequently with several researchers including:

  • Alex S. Cohen
  • Peter W. Foltz
  • Chelsea Chandler
  • Terje B. Holmlund
  • Catherine Diaz-Asper

Their research contributions emphasize the intersection of psychology and technology, with particular attention to psychiatric disorders, digital methodologies, and cognitive processes. The integration of artificial intelligence in psychiatric applications and the use of digital phenotyping are notable elements of their work.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is the core of the disorder.

    Brita Elvevag;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Effect of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase val158met Genotype on Attentional Control

    Giuseppe Blasi;Venkata S. Mattay;Alessandro Bertolino;Alessandro Bertolino;Alessandro Bertolino;Brita Elvevåg

  • Quantifying incoherence in speech: An automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia

    Brita Elvevåg;Peter W. Foltz;Daniel R. Weinberger;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Genes, cognition and brain through a COMT lens.

    Dwight Dickinson;Brita Elvevåg

  • Random Texts Do Not Exhibit the Real Zipf's Law-Like Rank Distribution

    Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho;Brita Elvevåg

  • Duration judgements in patients with schizophrenia.

    Brita Elvevåg;Teresa McCormack;Teresa McCormack;A. Gilbert;A. Gilbert;G. D. A. Brown;G. D. A. Brown

  • An automated method to analyze language use in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives

    Brita Elvevåg;Peter W. Foltz;Peter W. Foltz;Mark Rosenstein;Lynn E. DeLisi

  • Habitual prospective memory in schizophrenia

    Brita Elvevåg;Elizabeth A Maylor;Abigail L Gilbert

  • Automated computerized analysis of speech in psychiatric disorders.

    Alex S. Cohen;Brita Elvevåg

  • Category fluency, latent semantic analysis and schizophrenia: a candidate gene approach.

    Kristin K. Nicodemus;Brita Elvevåg;Peter W. Foltz;Mark Rosenstein

  • Dissociating the effects of Sternberg working memory demands in prefrontal cortex.

    Mario Altamura;Mario Altamura;Brita Elvevåg;Giuseppe Blasi;Giuseppe Blasi;Alessandro Bertolino;Alessandro Bertolino

  • BDNF Val66Met polymorphism significantly affects d′ in verbal recognition memory at short and long delays

    Terry E. Goldberg;Jennifer Iudicello;Christine Russo;Brita Elvevåg

  • Continuous Performance Test and Schizophrenia: A Test of Stimulus-Response Compatibility, Working Memory, Response Readiness, or None of the Above?

    Brita Elvevåg;Daniel R. Weinberger;Jesse C. Suter;Terry E. Goldberg

  • What do we really know about blunted vocal affect and alogia? A meta-analysis of objective assessments

    Alex S. Cohen;Kyle R. Mitchell;Brita Elvevåg

  • The use of cognitive context in schizophrenia: an investigation

    Brita Elvevåg;J. Duncan;P. J. McKenna

  • The Evolution of the exponent of Zipf's law in language ontogeny

    Jaume Baixeries;Brita Elvevåg;Brita Elvevåg;Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho

  • Cognitive Factor Structure and Invariance in People With Schizophrenia, Their Unaffected Siblings, and Controls

    Dwight Dickinson;Dwight Dickinson;Terry E. Goldberg;James M. Gold;Brita Elvevåg

  • Identification of tone duration, line length, and letter position: an experimental approach to timing and working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

    Brita Elvevag;Gordon D. A. Brown;Teresa Mccormack;Janet I. Vousden

  • Latent semantic variables are associated with formal thought disorder and adaptive behavior in older inpatients with schizophrenia.

    Katherine Holshausen;Philip D. Harvey;Brita Elvevåg;Peter W. Foltz

  • A comparison of verbal fluency tasks in schizophrenic patients and normal controls

    B Elvevåg;D.M Weinstock;M Akil;J.E Kleinman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Weinberger
Daniel R. Weinberger Johns Hopkins University
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University
Terry E. Goldberg
Terry E. Goldberg Columbia University
Dwight Dickinson
Dwight Dickinson National Institutes of Health
Alessandro Bertolino
Alessandro Bertolino University of Bari Aldo Moro
Richard Coppola
Richard Coppola National Institutes of Health
Michael F. Egan
Michael F. Egan MSD (United States)
James M. Gold
James M. Gold University of Maryland, Baltimore
Venkata S. Mattay
Venkata S. Mattay Lieber Institute for Brain Development
Raymond P. Tucker
Raymond P. Tucker Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to varied online academic and career options in the USA. Prospective students often consider flexibility and cost when searching for the right programs. For those looking for a quick career boost, online certifications offer specialized skill-building and can lead to well-paying positions in related fields, such as healthcare technology or research support.

If you're searching for accessible entry points into higher education, check out the easiest online degrees. These can provide essential foundational knowledge and act as stepping stones to more advanced study in neuroscience and other sciences.

For those interested in applied neuroscience, mental health, or social work, affordability is key. Explore the cheapest online msw programs, which can lead to impactful roles in clinical settings. Alternatively, if you’re considering a career in behavior analysis, options like the cheapest bcba online program provide affordable educational pathways to board certification.

With numerous flexible and affordable online options, students can tailor their academic journey to match their interests and career ambitions in neuroscience and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Brita Elvevåg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles