World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
15921
World Ranking
3495
National Ranking
1614

Richard Coppola publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Coppola sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard Coppola D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Coppola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Coppola is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their primary field of research lies within Neuroscience, with a focused interest in Cognitive Neuroscience. Their scholarly work addresses several main topics including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, and Neuroscience and Music Perception.

Their recent publication record includes a study titled Spatiotemporal Alterations in Working Memory-Related Beta Band Neuromagnetic Activity of Patients With Schizophrenia On and Off Antipsychotic Medication: Investigation With MEG, published in 2023 in the journal Schizophrenia Bulletin. This paper explores changes in neuromagnetic activity linked to working memory deficits in schizophrenia, reflecting a concentration on neural dynamics.

The venues in which Coppola has published are closely related to psychiatric and neurological sciences, with Schizophrenia Bulletin being a noted example of their publication outlets.

They collaborate with several researchers, including:

  • Daniel Rubinstein
  • Daniel P. Eisenberg
  • Frederick W. Carver
  • Tom Holroyd
  • José Apud

The research topics they address indicate a blend of functional neuroimaging, cognitive processes, and the auditory system's role in neuroscience. Their work intersects with the study of brain connectivity and the temporal dynamics of brain function, particularly in clinical populations such as those affected by schizophrenia.

Best Publications

  • Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI.

    Joseph H. Callicott;Venkata S. Mattay;Alessandro Bertolino;Kimberly Finn

  • Physiological Dysfunction of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Schizophrenia Revisited

    Joseph H. Callicott;Alessandro Bertolino;Venkata S. Mattay;Frederick J.P. Langheim

  • Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts.

    R. T. Pivik;R. J. Broughton;R. Coppola;R. J. Davidson

  • Executive subprocesses in working memory: relationship to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and schizophrenia.

    Terry E. Goldberg;Michael F. Egan;Tonya Gscheidle;Richard Coppola

  • Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A positron emission tomography study

    Karen Faith Berman;Jill L. Ostrem;Christopher Randolph;James Gold

  • Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance

    Steven L. Bressler;Richard Coppola;Richard Nakamura

  • Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks.

    Danielle S. Bassett;Edward T. Bullmore;Edward T. Bullmore;Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg;José A. Apud

  • Reduced Central Serotonin Transporters in Alcoholism

    Andreas Heinz;Paul Ragan;Douglas W. Jones;Dan Hommer

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain mapping in psychiatry: methodological issues illustrated in a study of working memory in schizophrenia

    Joseph H. Callicott;Nicolas F. Ramsey;Kathleen Tallent;Alessandro Bertolino

  • Neuronal Avalanches in the Resting MEG of the Human Brain

    Oren Shriki;Jeff Alstott;Frederick Carver;Tom Holroyd

  • Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation.

    Venkata S. Mattay;Joseph H. Callicott;Alessandro Bertolino;Ian Heaton

  • The effect of amphetamine on regional cerebral blood flow during cognitive activation in schizophrenia.

    David G. Daniel;Daniel R. Weinberger;Douglas W. Jones;Jeffrey Fl Zigun

  • Prefrontal broadband noise, working memory, and genetic risk for schizophrenia.

    Georg Winterer;Richard Coppola;Terry E. Goldberg;Michael F. Egan

  • Tourette Syndrome: Prediction of Phenotypic Variation in Monozygotic Twins by Caudate Nucleus D2 Receptor Binding

    Steven S. Wolf;Douglas W. Jones;Michael B. Knable;Julia G. Gorey

  • Specific versus nonspecific brain activity in a parametric N-back task.

    Johan Martijn Jansma;Nick F. Ramsey;Richard Coppola;René S. Kahn

  • In vivo determination of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor availability in schizophrenia.

    Thomas J. Raedler;Michael B. Knable;Michael B. Knable;Michael B. Knable;Douglas W. Jones;Douglas W. Jones;Douglas W. Jones;Richard A. Urbina;Richard A. Urbina;Richard A. Urbina

  • Increased anterior cingulate cortical activity in response to fearful faces: a neurophysiological biomarker that predicts rapid antidepressant response to ketamine.

    Giacomo Salvadore;Brian R. Cornwell;Veronica Colon-Rosario;Richard Coppola

  • Cerebral morphometric abnormalities in Tourette's syndrome A quantitative MRI study of monozygotic twins

    T. M. Hyde;M. E. Stacey;R. Coppola;S. F. Handel

  • Schizophrenia: reduced signal-to-noise ratio and impaired phase-locking during information processing.

    G Winterer;M Ziller;H Dorn;K Frick

  • A new system for gray-level surface distribution maps of electrical activity

    M.S Buchsbaum;F Rigal;R Coppola;J Cappelletti

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Weinberger
Daniel R. Weinberger Johns Hopkins University
Terry E. Goldberg
Terry E. Goldberg Columbia University
Georg Winterer
Georg Winterer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael F. Egan
Michael F. Egan MSD (United States)
Monte S. Buchsbaum
Monte S. Buchsbaum University of California, San Diego
Karen F. Berman
Karen F. Berman National Institutes of Health
Venkata S. Mattay
Venkata S. Mattay Lieber Institute for Brain Development
Alessandro Bertolino
Alessandro Bertolino University of Bari Aldo Moro
Joseph H. Callicott
Joseph H. Callicott National Institutes of Health
Steven L. Bressler
Steven L. Bressler Florida Atlantic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard Coppola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles