World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
14193
World Ranking
6814
National Ranking
456

Michael J. Chandler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Chandler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Chandler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Chandler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Chandler is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a significant focus on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Physiology.

Their research revolves around several core topics, including:

  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Chandler's recent publications display a concentration on pain management and opioid therapy. The following papers outline some of their latest work:

  • Care Models to Improve Pain and Reduce Opioids Among Patients Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy (2024), published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Buprenorphine, Pain, and Opioid Use in Patients Taking High-Dose Long-Term Opioids (2025), published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Characterizing Patients after Opioid Taper in a VA Medical Center (2021), published in Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
  • Comparing Effectiveness of Gabapentin and Pregabalin in Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort of Palliative Care Outpatients (2020), published in Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
  • Developing a Life Story Intervention for Older Adults With Dementia or at Risk of Delirium Who Were Hospitalized: Multistage, Stakeholder-Engaged Co-Design Study (2024), published in JMIR Aging

They frequently publish in venues such as:

  • JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
  • JMIR Aging
  • Cureus
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Chandler collaborates often with several co-authors, including:

  • Jacob T. Painter
  • Erin E. Krebs
  • David Nelson
  • Beth DeRonne
  • Allyson M. Kats

Best Publications

  • Cultural Continuity as a Hedge against Suicide in Canada's First Nations

    Michael J. Chandler;Christopher E. Lalonde

  • Egocentrism and antisocial behavior: The assessment and training of social perspective-taking skills.

    Michael J. Chandler

  • Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research.

    Lester Luborsky;Arthur H. Auerbach;Michael Chandler;Jacob Cohen

  • Small-scale deceit: deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds' early theories of mind.

    Michael Chandler;Anna S. Fritz;Suzanne Hala

  • Personal persistence, identity development, and suicide: a study of Native and Non-native North American adolescents

    Michael J. Chandler;Christopher E. Lalonde;Bryan W. Sokol;Darcy Hallett

  • On the Distinction between False Belief Understanding and Subscribing to an Interpretive Theory of Mind

    Jeremy I. Carpendale;Michael J. Chandler

  • Aboriginal language knowledge and youth suicide

    Darcy Hallett;Darcy Hallett;Michael J. Chandler;Christopher E. Lalonde

  • Wisdom: Explorations in Adult Competence

    Stephen G. Holliday;Michael J. Chandler

  • False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind.

    Chris E. Lalonde;Michael J. Chandler

  • Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identity formation in adolescence.

    Michael C. Boyes;Michael Chandler

  • Doubt and developing theories of mind.

    Michael Chandler

  • Fledgling Theories of Mind: Deception as a Marker of Three‐Year‐Olds' Understanding of False Belief

    Suzanne Hala;Michael Chandler;Anna S. Fritz

  • Assessment and Training of Role-Taking and Referential Communication Skills in Institutionalized Emotionally Disturbed Children.

    Michael J. Chandler;Stephen Greenspan;Carl Barenboim

  • Cultural Continuity as a Protective Factor Against Suicide in First Nations Youth

    Michael J. Chandler;Christopher E. Lalonde

  • Competing claims about competing knowledge claims.

    Michael J. Chandler;Darcy Hallett;Bryan W. Sokol

  • The Othello Effect

    Michael Chandler

  • Children's understanding of interpretation

    Christopher E Lalonde;Michael J Chandler

  • Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt

    Michael Chandler;Michael Boyes;Lorraine Ball

  • Developmental Changes in the Contribution of Shared Experience to Social Role-Taking Competence

    Michael J. Chandler;David Helm

  • Ersatz egocentrism: A reply to H. Borke.

    Michael J. Chandler;Stephen Greenspan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy I. M. Carpendale
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale Simon Fraser University
Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University
Reinhard Pekrun
Reinhard Pekrun Australian Catholic University
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia Michigan State University
Carola Suárez-Orozco
Carola Suárez-Orozco University of California, Los Angeles
Louis J. Moses
Louis J. Moses University of Oregon
Katherine Nelson
Katherine Nelson City University of New York
Hubert J. M. Hermans
Hubert J. M. Hermans Radboud University
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University
Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of career pathways—both online and on-campus programs can set you up for success. One of the most rewarding fields is mental health counseling, where professionals are in high demand across the United States.

Education requirements for mental health counselors may differ by state and city, so it’s important to research local standards. For instance, learn about Albuquerque mental health counselor education requirements or discover how to become a mental health counselor in Anaheim to understand specific regional rules.

For those interested in opportunities in the north, check out how to become a mental health counselor in Anchorage. Similarly, if you’re considering the East Coast, look into Arlington mental health counselor education requirements.

In summary, online degrees in psychology not only offer flexibility, but also help you meet regional requirements, making it easier to start your career as a mental health counselor wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Chandler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles