World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
11342
World Ranking
8395
National Ranking
4481

Monika Ardelt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Ardelt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Monika Ardelt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Ardelt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monika Ardelt is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work contributes notably to several subfields including Social Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research mainly addresses topics related to Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Aging and Gerontology Research, Optimism, Hope, and Well-being, as well as Health Disparities and Outcomes. Additional thematic areas include Employment and Welfare Studies, Retirement, Disability, and Employment, along with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior.

Monika Ardelt's recent publications demonstrate a focus on the concept of wisdom and its implications for well-being and organizational behavior. Notable recent papers include:

  • The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns, 2020, Psychological Inquiry
  • Linking Wise Organizations to Wise Leadership, Job Satisfaction, and Well-Being, 2021, Frontiers in Communication
  • Three-Dimensional Wisdom and Perceived Stress among College Students, 2020, Journal of Adult Development
  • Does Self-Transcendent Wisdom Mediate the Relation between Spirituality and Well-Being? A Test Across Six Nations, 2023, Journal of Happiness Studies

Their work is often published in venues such as Innovation in Aging, Aging & Mental Health, Psychological Inquiry, Frontiers in Communication, and Journal of Counseling & Development.

Monika Ardelt collaborates frequently with several researchers across multiple projects. Frequent co-authors include Michel Ferrari, Bhavna Sharma, Juensung J. Kim, Jared Kingsbury, and Chidimma Doris Azubuike.

Best Publications

  • Managing to Make It: Urban Families and Adolescent Success

    Frank F. Furstenberg;Monika Ardelt

  • Empirical Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale

    Monika Ardelt

  • Inner-City Parents Under Economic Pressure: Perspectives on the Strategies of Parenting.

    Glen H. Elder;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Monika Ardelt;Sarah Lord

  • Effects of Mothers' Parental Efficacy Beliefs and Promotive Parenting Strategies on Inner-City Youth

    Monika Ardelt;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Wisdom as Expert Knowledge System: A Critical Review of a Contemporary Operationalization of an Ancient Concept

    Monika Ardelt

  • Wisdom and Life Satisfaction in Old Age

    Monika Ardelt

  • Families Under Economic Pressure

    Glen H. Elder;Rand D. Conger;E. Michael Foster;Monika Ardelt

  • Expert Consensus on Characteristics of Wisdom: A Delphi Method Study

    Dilip V. Jeste;Monika Ardelt;Dan Blazer;Helena C. Kraemer

  • INTELLECTUAL VERSUS WISDOM-RELATED KNOWLEDGE: THE CASE FOR A DIFFERENT KIND OF LEARNING IN THE LATER YEARS OF LIFE

    Monika Ardelt

  • Still stable after all these years? Personality stability theory revisited.

    Monika Ardelt

  • Antecedents and Effects of Wisdom in Old Age A Longitudinal Perspective on Aging Well

    Monika Ardelt

  • The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns

    Igor Grossmann;Nic M. Weststrate;Monika Ardelt;Justin Peter Brienza

  • Effects of Religion and Purpose in Life on Elders' Subjective Well-Being and Attitudes Toward Death

    Monika Ardelt

  • Parents, Siblings, and Peers:: Close Social Relationships and Adolescent Deviance

    Monika Ardelt;Laurie Day

  • How wise people cope with crises and obstacles in life

    Monika Ardelt

  • Self-Reported Wisdom and Happiness: An Empirical Investigation

    Ad Bergsma;Monika Ardelt

  • The Role of Religion for Hospice Patients and Relatively Healthy Older Adults

    Monika Ardelt;Cynthia S. Koenig

  • Are Older Adults Wiser Than College Students? A Comparison of Two Age Cohorts

    Monika Ardelt

  • The Measurement of Wisdom: A Commentary on Taylor, Bates, and Webster's Comparison of the SAWS and 3D-WS

    Monika Ardelt

  • Wisdom and Hard Times: The Ameliorating Effect of Wisdom on the Negative Association Between Adverse Life Events and Well-Being.

    Monika Ardelt;Dilip V. Jeste

  • The Many Faces of Wisdom An Investigation of Cultural-Historical Wisdom Exemplars Reveals Practical, Philosophical, and Benevolent Prototypes

    Nic M. Weststrate;Michel Ferrari;Monika Ardelt

Frequent Co-Authors

George E. Vaillant
George E. Vaillant Harvard University
Dilip V. Jeste
Dilip V. Jeste University of California, San Diego
Glen H. Elder
Glen H. Elder University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
E. Michael Foster
E. Michael Foster University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Katherine J. Bangen
Katherine J. Bangen University of California, San Diego
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
Amy L. Ai
Amy L. Ai Florida State University
Lawrence G. Calhoun
Lawrence G. Calhoun University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Merril Silverstein
Merril Silverstein Syracuse University
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees and career pathways in psychology can help you find the fastest route to a rewarding role in mental health services. Accredited online psychology and counseling programs offer flexible options, allowing students to complete coursework at their own pace, often with accelerated timelines.

Individuals who wish to become counselors should consider the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Indiana or the fastest way to become a counselor in Iowa. These guides outline streamlined educational requirements, licensing steps, and the benefits of online study options available in each state.

If you’re interested in even more accelerated options, explore available Kansas accelerated counseling programs. Similarly, aspiring counselors in neighboring regions might consider the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Kentucky for state-specific pathways and advice.

Whether you aim to start a career as a counselor, therapist, or pursue advanced roles, online degrees can fast-track your journey while providing essential foundation and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Monika Ardelt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles