World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9010 8415 4777 4347 92 12428

Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 5 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2007 2025

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 3
2011 4
2012 3
2013 9
2014 17
2015 6
2016 4
2017 6
2018 7
2019 9
2020 3
2021 7
2022 5
2023 4
2024 4
2025 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 92
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research contributions span various areas within psychology and social sciences, focusing on the dynamics of motivation, educational achievement, and individual differences.

Their work primarily falls within the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with particular expertise in subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy

Among recent publications, Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia has contributed to several journal articles:

  • Comparing the roles and correlates of emotions in class and during online video lectures in a flipped anatomy classroom, 2021, Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Patterns, predictors, and outcomes of situated expectancy-value profiles in an introductory chemistry course, 2023, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Motivational Pathways Underlying Gifted Underachievement: Trajectory Classes, Longitudinal Outcomes, and Predicting Factors, 2022, Gifted Child Quarterly
  • Instructional Supports for Motivation Trajectories in Introductory College Engineering, 2022, AERA Open
  • A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Mastery Goal Support in 7th-Grade Science Classrooms, 2022, Cognition and Instruction

Frequent publication venues include:

  • 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
  • Learning and Individual Differences
  • Educational Psychologist
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Collaborations with other researchers are also a notable aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kristy A. Robinson
  • S. Patrick Walton
  • Pei Pei Liu
  • You-kyung Lee
  • Tony Perez

Best Publications

  • Academic Emotions and Student Engagement

    Reinhard Pekrun;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • International handbook of emotions in education.

    Reinhard Pekrun;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • The Role of Achievement Goals in the Development of Interest: Reciprocal Relations Between Achievement Goals, Interest, and Performance

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Amanda M. Durik;Kenneth E. Barron;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Reinhard Pekrun

  • Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains.

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Amanda M. Durik;Anne Marie M Conley;Kenneth E. Barron

  • Affect and engagement during small group instruction

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Toni Kempler Rogat;Kristin L.K. Koskey

  • When are Achievement Goal Orientations Beneficial for Academic Achievement? A Closer Look at Main Effects and Moderating Factors

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Diana F. Tyson;Erika Alisha Patall

  • Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Groups: An Analysis of the Interplay between Quality of Social Regulation and Group Processes.

    Toni Kempler Rogat;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • Adaptive Motivation and Emotion in Education: Research and Principles for Instructional Design

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Erika A. Patall;Reinhard Pekrun

  • Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science

    Kevin J. Pugh;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Kristin L. K. Koskey;Victoria C. Stewart

  • A New Look at Multiple Goal Pursuit: the Promise of a Person-Centered Approach

    Stephanie Virgine Wormington;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • The Strength of the Relation Between Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Goal Orientations: Theoretical, Methodological, and Instructional Implications

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Michael J. Middleton;Keith D. Ciani;Matthew A. Easter

  • Antecedents and consequences of situational interest.

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Erika Alisha Patall;Emily E. Messersmith

  • Multiple Pathways to Success: An Examination of Integrative Motivational Profiles Among Upper Elementary and College Students.

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Stephanie V. Wormington;Kate E. Snyder;Jan Riggsbee

  • From science student to scientist: Predictors and outcomes of heterogeneous science identity trajectories in college.

    Kristy A. Robinson;Tony Perez;Amy K. Nuttall;Cary J. Roseth

  • Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students

    Adar Ben-Eliyahu;Adar Ben-Eliyahu;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • Extending self-regulated learning to include self-regulated emotion strategies

    Adar Ben-Eliyahu;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering.

    Kristy A. Robinson;You-kyung Lee;Emily A. Bovee;Tony Perez

  • A Developmental, Person-Centered Approach to Exploring Multiple Motivational Pathways in Gifted Underachievement

    Kate E. Snyder;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • The Message Matters: The Role of Implicit Beliefs About Giftedness and Failure Experiences in Academic Self-Handicapping

    Kate E. Snyder;Jenessa L. Malin;Amy L. Dent;Amy L. Dent;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Reinhard Pekrun
Reinhard Pekrun Australian Catholic University
Erika A. Patall
Erika A. Patall University of Southern California
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University
Michael J. Chandler
Michael J. Chandler University of British Columbia
Carola Suárez-Orozco
Carola Suárez-Orozco University of California, Los Angeles
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Stuart A. Karabenick
Stuart A. Karabenick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer A. Fredricks
Jennifer A. Fredricks Connecticut College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens numerous online degree options and specialized career pathways. Many students are attracted to roles such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a rewarding field with growing demand across the U.S. To pursue this path, it's crucial to understand regional requirements and educational backgrounds needed to practice.

For instance, those interested in becoming a therapist in Virginia can review the Norfolk mft certification requirements to understand what’s necessary to qualify in that area. Requirements will differ by city and state, so it's also helpful to look into how to become a marriage and family therapist in North Las Vegas as an example from Nevada, and how to become an mft in Oakland for insights relevant to California.

Each location has unique licensure processes and educational standards. For example, Oklahoma candidates should be aware of the Oklahoma City mft certification requirements. By comparing these different pathways, students can choose the best online programs and prepare for a variety of professional opportunities in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles