World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2101 1908 1220 1081 135 43925

Judith M. Harackiewicz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judith M. Harackiewicz between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judith M. Harackiewicz published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2000. 6 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2000. 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 9 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1979 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judith M. Harackiewicz: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 3
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 9
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 5
2008 9
2009 1
2010 4
2011 2
2012 2
2013 0
2014 3
2015 7
2016 6
2017 9
2018 6
2019 8
2020 4
2021 6
2022 3
2023 7
2024 1
2025 5
Total 149
Download as CSV

Judith M. Harackiewicz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith M. Harackiewicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Judith M. Harackiewicz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith M. Harackiewicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Judith M. Harackiewicz is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on various subfields including Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as Education, Achievement, and Giftedness, Career Development and Diversity, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Mentoring and Academic Development, Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, Cultural Differences and Values, and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods.

Judith M. Harackiewicz has published frequently in venues such as Motivation Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Educational Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, and UNC Libraries. Their recent papers include:

  • Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • College students' reasons for leaving biomedical fields: Disenchantment with biomedicine or attraction to other fields? (2020, Journal of Educational Psychology)
  • The role of utility value in promoting interest development (2020, Motivation Science)
  • Utility-value intervention promotes persistence and diversity in STEM (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Inside the STEM pipeline: Changes in students' biomedical career plans across the college years (2021, Science Advances)

Their frequent co-authors include Michael W. Asher, Cameron A. Hecht, Janet Shibley Hyde, Jessi L. Smith, and Dustin B. Thoman, with multiple collaborations reflecting sustained research partnerships.

Judith M. Harackiewicz has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.

    Andrew J. Elliot;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century:

    Suzanne Hidi;Judith M Harackiewicz

  • Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis.

    Andrew J. Elliot;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Kenneth E. Barron;Paul R. Pintrich;Andrew J. Elliot

  • A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?

    Chris S. Hulleman;Sheree M. Schrager;Shawn M. Bodmann;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes

    Chris S. Hulleman;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models.

    Kenneth E. Barron;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Predicting Success in College: A Longitudinal Study of Achievement Goals and Ability Measures as Predictors of Interest and Performance From Freshman Year Through Graduation

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Kenneth E. Barron;John M. Tauer;Andrew J. Elliot

  • Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time.

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Kenneth E. Barron;John M. Tauer;Suzanne M. Carter

  • Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why?

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Kenneth E. Barron;Andrew J. Elliot

  • Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making the Grade

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Kenneth E. Barron;Suzanne M. Carter;Alan T. Lehto

  • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation : the search for optimal motivation and performance

    Carol Sansone;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions

    Corwin Senko;Chris S. Hulleman;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention.

    Chris S. Hulleman;Olga Godes;Bryan L. Hendricks;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • The Role of Achievement Goals in the Development of Interest: Reciprocal Relations Between Achievement Goals, Interest, and Performance

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Amanda M. Durik;Kenneth E. Barron;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia

  • Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis.

    Chris S. Hulleman;Amanda M. Durik;Shaun B. Schweigert;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Helping Parents to Motivate Adolescents in Mathematics and Science An Experimental Test of a Utility-Value Intervention

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Christopher S. Rozek;Chris S. Hulleman;Janet S. Hyde

  • The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation.

    Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation.

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Andrew J. Elliot

  • Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Jessi L. Smith;Stacy J. Priniski

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carol Sansone
Carol Sansone University of Utah
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester
Céline Darnon
Céline Darnon University of Clermont Auvergne
Fabrizio Butera
Fabrizio Butera University of Lausanne
Gabriel Mugny
Gabriel Mugny University of Geneva
Jill Burstein
Jill Burstein Princeton University
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia Michigan State University
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs
John F. Kihlstrom
John F. Kihlstrom University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and fulfilling career pathways in the USA. One popular option is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a role that blends expertise in psychology, communication, and healthcare.

The requirements for becoming a speech therapist can differ significantly depending on the state. For example, individuals interested in becoming a speech therapist in Oregon must meet specific educational and clinical experience standards. Similarly, those seeking Pennsylvania speech pathologist certification requirements will find unique state-mandated steps including licensure examinations and supervised practice.

If you are considering work outside these areas, you may want to review guidance on how to become a speech language pathologist in Rhode Island or understand slp requirements in South Carolina. Online psychology and SLP programs can help streamline your journey by offering accredited coursework and flexible schedules. Researching your intended state’s requirements is a critical first step toward a rewarding psychology-based career.

Best Scientists Citing Judith M. Harackiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles